Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
O no! :(( I hope you perform bad in upcoming matches. Here take my jinx :om:
don't worry you will beat me...have only 65 subs left :nervous: aiming for top 7....hope will get my kapdans right :)
Posted
Pathan is very unsafe, considering his form since 2010 and :winky: my available transfers... Kallis, he fails when i pick him and do the opposite otherwise... i am picking him, so by logic u guyz dont pick him to be safe :hysterical:
i told u... KALLIS :bumsmack: JH Kallis 4 50 0 Ec. 12.50 JH Kallis 19 20 Sr. 95.00 :banghead: & he got me -1
Posted
why doesn't faulkner have 205 pts for match against srh. 125+20(mom)+20(3 wk bonus)+30(5wk bonus)=205.
And watson should have 123 pts. 98+15 (sr bonus)+20(2catches)-(10 bowling economy)=123 seems they have added mom bonus for watson instead of faulkner
Posted
And watson should have 123 pts. 98+15 (sr bonus)+20(2catches)-(10 bowling economy)=123 seems they have added mom bonus for watson instead of faulkner
yes i checked it, seems u r right mate :hitler: Faulkner wickets 25 5 125 205 Cricinfo - 185 Econo 10 1 10 3s 20 1 20 5s 30 1 30 MoM 20 1 20 Watson Runs 1 98 98 123 Cricinfo - 143 Econo -10 1 -10 sr 15 1 15 50ty 20 1 20
Posted

@leoniraj and @Aadhavzone Dudes, you got the computation wrong. Faulker - 125 (5 w) + 10 (Eco) + 30 (5-fer) + 20 (MoM) = 185 [No points for 3-fer if the bloke took a 5-fer. This is different from the batting rule which gives 20 points for every 50 runs] Watson - 98 (runs) + 20 (50+ score) + 20 (catches) + 15 (Strike Rate) + -10 (Eco) = 143

×
×
  • Create New...