Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This thread is for discussing new talents on display in the IPL. I am particularly interested in tracking Siddharth Kaul Mohit Sharma Ankit Rajpoot Shami Ahmed Shikhar Dhawan Cheteshwar Pujara Unmukt Chand Ishwar Pandey Sandeep Warrier Kedar Jadav Ambati Rayudu Pervez Rasool Srikant Wagh Sarabjit Laddha Only question is, how many chances will these players get ?

Posted

Manan Vohra has played an interesting innings. Hanuma Vihari has been decent too. Rahul Shukla, among pacers, has been one of the most interesting ones we have seen so far. Really quick and taking wickets too. Wicket keeper Yagnik has been superb.

Posted

CSK - Ankit Rajpoot DD - Manpreet Juneja KXIP - Manan Vohra KKR - Mohd Shami MI - Rishi Dhawan and Dinesh Karthick PWI - Bhuvanesh Kumar RR - Rahul Shukla RCB - Unadkat

Posted
The best talent ' date=' KOHLI, is doing superbly. :--D[/quote'] Don't talk about people you haven't listed :nono: And how can you even say that Kohli is a better talent than Pujara :facepalm:
Posted
Don't talk about people you haven't listed :nono: And how can you even say that Kohli is a better talent than Pujara :facepalm:
Where have I said that the list is exhaustive ? :haha: I have nothing against Pujara, like him a LOT. But in the IPL he is not a proven commodity yet. Don't try to convert everything into a fight between 2 Indian cricketers. I like all Indian cricketers who are either performing well currently or have the potential to do so
Posted
Where have I said that the list is exhaustive ? :haha: I have nothing against Pujara, like him a LOT. But in the IPL he is not a proven commodity yet. Don't try to convert everything into a fight between 2 Indian cricketers. I like all Indian cricketers who are either performing well currently or have the potential to do so
Neither is Kohli. :beee: My question was anyway about your list and not any and every cricketer. And it is not a 'FIGHT'. It's just the misuse of the word 'best'. Rohit Sharma is a better 'IPL batsman' than Kohli.
Posted
Neither is Kohli. :beee: My question was anyway about your list and not any and every cricketer. And it is not a 'FIGHT'. It's just the misuse of the word 'best'. Rohit Sharma is a better 'IPL batsman' than Kohli.
When you use the word talent in modern cricket , it has to be somebody who performs well in all 3 formats. Pujara is perhaps the best new batsman in tests, Rohit one of the better one in t20 but Kohli is reasonably successful in all 3 formats including decent success in the IPL. It is perhaps not too inappropriate to call him the best talent as per current assessment. It might change in the future though. Regarding the listed players, most have not had enough or any chances to play.
Posted
When you use the word talent in modern cricket , it has to be somebody who performs well in all 3 formats. Pujara is perhaps the best new batsman in tests, Rohit one of the better one in t20 but Kohli is reasonably successful in all 3 formats including decent success in the IPL. It is perhaps not too inappropriate to call him the best talent as per current assessment. It might change in the future though. Regarding the listed players, most have not had enough or any chances to play.
Kohli is good in one format, average at the other two. Pujara is good in one format, not played the other two. Rohit is good in one format, sucks in the other and not played the other one. Everyone seems to have their own definition of talent, and you perhaps have your own. But if you have to find the best Indian talent in IPL specifically, it would probably be Raina followed by Rohit.
Posted
Kohli is good in one format, average at the other two. Pujara is good in one format, not played the other two. Rohit is good in one format, sucks in the other and not played the other one. Everyone seems to have their own definition of talent, and you perhaps have your own. But if you have to find the best Indian talent in IPL specifically, it would probably be Raina followed by Rohit.
Apart from his first 6 tests, Kohli has been above average in the next 10 or 11 tests he has played. Many good players have teething problems. Debaters will debate but from a cricketing point of view, Kohli is now a good test batsman. I definitely consider somebody who can play all 3 formats well as the best talent . I am not talking about the best IPL performer but the performance of the best overall talents -- in the IPL. It is possible that Pujara or somebody else will do this better than Kohli in the future. The more the merrier.
Posted
Apart from his first 6 tests, Kohli has been above average in the next 10 or 11 tests he has played. Many good players have teething problems. Debaters will debate but from a cricketing point of view, Kohli is now a good test batsman. I definitely consider somebody who can play all 3 formats well as the best talent . I am not talking about the best IPL performer but the performance of the best overall talents -- in the IPL. It is possible that Pujara or somebody else will do this better than Kohli in the future. The more the merrier.
From a cricketing point of view, someone who averages less than 42 overall and only 28 overseas is an average Test cricketer. Even after the first six Tests, he has just minnow-bashed NZ and boosted his average, he has just crossed 50 just thrice in about 12 knocks against Aus and Eng. Average! I thought your OP was IPL specific and had nothing to do with talent across formats.
Posted
Hanuma Vihari has been the find of the season-Get this kind into the reserves atleast :agree:
He will start with his IPL team first, going to reserves that is. :hysterical:
Posted
From a cricketing point of view, someone who averages less than 42 overall and only 28 overseas is an average Test cricketer. Even after the first six Tests, he has just minnow-bashed NZ and boosted his average, he has just crossed 50 just thrice in about 12 knocks against Aus and Eng. Average! I thought your OP was IPL specific and had nothing to do with talent across formats.
What does Pujara average overseas ? Why don't you bring that up while discussing his performance and talent ? Kohli has played 3 good innings in Australia. His overseas average is low mainly due to his bad performance in the West Indies in his first test series. As I said, teething problems. He averages around 58 in the last 11 tests or so. Fact is -- unless a player has played 40 or 50 tests or so, records don't give the correct picture of a player's performance and ability. Short period statistics are misleading more often than not and the manner of playing gives a better picture. That is why we are so optimistic about Pujara.
×
×
  • Create New...