Jump to content

2003 WC runners up team vs 2013 CT finalist team


2003 WC runners up team vs 2013 CT finalist team  

  1. 1.

    • 2003 WC runners up team
      10
    • 2011 CT finalist team
      6


Recommended Posts

Posted

lets say we bring that team to england in a time machine and make them play a best of 3 one day series against this team... provided there is no rain and the conditions are 1st match seaming conditions (like sri lanka semi finals) 2nd match aids spin 3rd match batting paradise also that team is yet to play finals, so *that thrashing* didn't happen yet. so their confidence is still high who will win? that team in case u forgot (players on 2003 Semi final form and age) Tendulkar Sehwag Ganguly * kaif dravid (wk) yuvraj mongia harbhajan zaheer srinath nehra this team now rohit dhawan kohli karthik raina dhoni * (wk) jadeja ashwin bhuvi ishanth yadav ----------- poll says 2011 CT team... just saw ... sry:--D ------------ i think CT 2013 team will be thrashed in a best of 3 series. 0-3 for me

Posted

kaif and mongia are ordinary in 2003 team also if dhawan can strike hard in the first few overs, "that zaheer" will spray all over the practice pitch next to the pitch the match is being played on :cantstop:

Posted
Tendulkar > Dhawan Sehwag > Rohit Ganguly < Kohli Kaif = Karthik Dravid < Dhobi Yuvraj > Jaddu The then Bhaji, Srinath > Ashwin, Yadav Mongia < Raina Zak < Bhuvi/Ishant 5-4 :orderorder:
tumblr_mared1FmDP1rbo5o4o1_500.jpg
Posted
Tendulkar > Dhawan Sehwag > Rohit Ganguly < Kohli Kaif = Karthik Dravid < Dhobi Yuvraj > Jaddu The then Bhaji, Srinath > Ashwin, Yadav Mongia < Raina Zak < Bhuvi/Ishant 5-4 :orderorder:
:WTF:
Posted
Tendulkar > Dhawan Sehwag > Rohit Ganguly < Kohli Kaif = Karthik Dravid < Dhobi Yuvraj > Jaddu The then Bhaji, Srinath > Ashwin, Yadav Mongia < Raina Zak < Bhuvi/Ishant 5-4 :orderorder:
kohli better than ganguly???? :withstupid:
Posted
kohli better than ganguly???? :withstupid:
Easily.
:WTF:
Yeah I don't remember the WC, except SRT did well and the Pak game. I remember thinking how chit Zakk was in final, 5 wides 1st ball, like 30 runs in first 2 overs. Set the tone. I used to think zakk was a bad bowler until I started following regularly and he became good. So 2003 zakk < most bowlers.
Posted

Average 40 > Average 50 :confused: 22 centuries in 350 matches > 13 in a hundred :confused: Strike rate 70 > Strike rate 90 :confused: Kohli is also better in field, runs faster between wickets, will have a better W/L as kaptaan and is more complete player in his batting :hehe:

Posted
Average 40 > Average 50 :confused: 22 centuries in 350 matches > 13 in a hundred :confused: Strike rate 70 > Strike rate 90 :confused: Kohli is also better in field, runs faster between wickets, will have a better W/L as kaptaan and is more complete player in his batting :hehe:
:withstupid:
Posted

kohli has a lot to prove outside SC,its like the pak passion forum had a thread younus khan>dravid:haha: based on stats.. u have to know the semantics related to the topic

Posted
kohli has a lot to prove outside SC,its like the pak passion forum had a thread younus khan>dravid:haha: based on stats.. u have to know the semantics related to the topic
He did well on his first tours away with 100's in Aus, Eng, 90's in WI, SA. Kohli currently averages higher in ODI's than Ganguly in England, SA and Australia. Above 50 in Aus, SA, above 45 in England and is well ahead of Ganguly. Anything else? :haha:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...