Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I've seen numerous people on talking on the phone during take-off/landing. I think the airline got carried away.
They gave an option "arrest" or "get off the plane" . If she had to go somewhere urgently , she cannot possibly get off. Atleast i would have expected her to be nicer to them.
Posted
They gave an option "arrest" or "get off the plane" . If she had to go somewhere urgently ' date=' she cannot possibly get off. Atleast i would have expected her to be nicer to them.[/quote'] Am not sure why she should've got off the plane. It's not like she was smoking a cigarette. And they were trying to arrest her because she was on the phone? That's draconian, and it upset her.
Posted
The "phone should not be used during landing/take off" is one of the most popular security myths of contemporary times.
Yes, it's a myth. But in India its also a government of India regulation and you are breaking a law if you are still doing it.
Posted
Am not sure why she should've got off the plane. It's not like she was smoking a cigarette. And they were trying to arrest her because she was on the phone? That's draconian' date=' and it upset her.[/quote'] The airlines have a right to deny service to someone breaking their rules and regulations. All airlines have rules about not using phones during take off and landings
Posted
Yes' date=' it's a myth. But in India its also a government of India regulation and you are breaking a law if you are still doing it.[/quote'] You're right. But, it's not endangering anyone's life, property or pursuit of happiness. It's only a nuisance. There is no reason for the deputies to go all ghetto on her. They are treating her like she's a terrorist. They should've just refused to fly the plane until she put her phone down and watched the other passengers shout her down.
Posted
You're right. But, it's not endangering anyone's life, property or pursuit of happiness. It's only a nuisance. There is no reason for the deputies to go all ghetto on her. They are treating her like she's a terrorist. They should've just refused to fly the plane until she put her phone down and watched the other passengers shout her down.
According to the official line, it does endanger the plane even if it's just cruising as it might mess with the instruments Of course that's not true
Posted
Yes' date=' it's a myth. But in India its also a government of India regulation and you are breaking a law if you are still doing it.[/quote'] Laws are made by humans; they can be incorrect and when that is so it is our duty to correct them. They are not cast and stone.
Posted
Laws are made by humans; they can be incorrect and when that is so it is our duty to correct them. They are not cast and stone.
You cannot break the law to correct them. You should do it through legal channels or debates.
Posted
You cannot break the law to correct them. You should do it through legal channels or debates.
Agreed. But, different laws must be enforced in different ways. For instance, I've never agreed with hand-cuffing an old guy who is arrested for running a ponzi scheme. What is the purpose of that? Other than to create a scene? This falls in the same category. Added in edit: So how do you feel about illegal immigrants? Do you support rounding them up, cuffing them and shoving them across the border? After all, they are breaking the law.
Posted
You cannot break the law to correct them. You should do it through legal channels or debates.
+1 I can't stand people who think they can get away with anything. People who don't care about other passengers and create scenes and cause avoidable delays for others don't deserve to go by public transport. Make your own arrangements you idiots.How difficult is it to follow simple rules like keeps phones off? It is not like a bursting bladder emergency. Stupid woman !
Posted
You cannot break the law to correct them. You should do it through legal channels or debates.
Wait - I never said "break the law" and make a scene. By standing up, I meant go through legal channels itself. However, sometimes a "push" is needed and these instances help. They’re not fond of rules. And they have no respect for the status quo. You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them. About the only thing you can’t do is ignore them. Because they change things. They push the human race forward. And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius. Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do. :winky: You require both kinds of people particularly in India where "Apna Kaam Bunta, Toh Bhaad Mein Jaaye Junta" attitude is shown in full effect.
Posted
The "phone should not be used during landing/take off" is one of the most popular security myths of contemporary times.
Why do you term it as a 'security' myth? From what I gather (and I'm not a science person), they ask you to switch off your cell phones cause the signals they transmit/receive may interfere with the signal sent by the communication devices on the plane. There must be some truth here. Otherwise we would not see I-pads, I-phones and some android phones come up with airplane mode. A myth fooling a layman is one thing, but for a well established corporate which spends $$$$$ on R & D , to accept the same seems highly unlikely. Just thinking out loud.
Posted
Why do you term it as a 'security' myth? From what I gather (and I'm not a science person), they ask you to switch off your cell phones cause the signals they transmit/receive may interfere with the signal sent by the communication devices on the plane. There must be some truth here. Otherwise we would not see I-pads, I-phones and some android phones come up with airplane mode. A myth fooling a layman is one thing, but for a well established corporate which spends $$$$$ on R & D , to accept the same seems highly unlikely. Just thinking out loud.
1. The do not ask/request you ; they force you. 2. No the signals DO NOT interfere with communication devices on the plane (hence myth). 3. Devices come with "Airplane Mode" for user convenience and it can not be used as an indicator to believe a non-existent reality. Their sole job is to make money and they provide a feature which user convenience PERIOD.
Posted
You're right. But, it's not endangering anyone's life, property or pursuit of happiness. It's only a nuisance. There is no reason for the deputies to go all ghetto on her. They are treating her like she's a terrorist. They should've just refused to fly the plane until she put her phone down and watched the other passengers shout her down.
Huh ? You want the fkin plane to be held hostage by people using their phones ? You know how much the airline loses when its sitting on the ground ?
Posted
Huh ? You want the fkin plane to be held hostage by people using their phones ? You know how much the airline loses when its sitting on the ground ?
Not to mention the precious time of the fellow passengers....
Posted
Why do you term it as a 'security' myth? From what I gather (and I'm not a science person), they ask you to switch off your cell phones cause the signals they transmit/receive may interfere with the signal sent by the communication devices on the plane. There must be some truth here. Otherwise we would not see I-pads, I-phones and some android phones come up with airplane mode. A myth fooling a layman is one thing, but for a well established corporate which spends $$$$$ on R & D , to accept the same seems highly unlikely. Just thinking out loud.
+1 The FAA prohibits in-flight use of wireless devices because of potential interference to the aircraft’s navigation and communication systems. Why take a risk?
Posted
+1 The FAA prohibits in-flight use of wireless devices because of potential interference to the aircraft’s navigation and communication systems. Why take a risk?
+1 Besides worldwide the airlines put in a lot of effort to announce and enforce it. I bet if it was not necessary...they would be putting the cabin crew to better use.
×
×
  • Create New...