Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
hence proved..
How to win an argument Raghav-style. 1. Pull random claim out of ass that reinforces deeply-held beliefs. "babies like white dolls so white skin is absolute beauty." 2. Get ass handed back to him by poster who refutes the claim with proper citation to delibrately fallacious claim. "How racism affects children" article on the Kenneth-Clark doll experiment. 3. Quickly claim that he won the argument without responding to facts presented by poster. 4. Get laughed at for being a tool. 5. Perform victory dance. "Hence proved"
Posted
How to win an argument Raghav-style. 1. Pull random claim out of ass that reinforces deeply-held beliefs. "babies like white dolls so white skin is absolute beauty." 2. Get ass handed back to him by poster who refutes the claim with proper citation to delibrately fallacious claim. "How racism affects children" article on the Kenneth-Clark doll experiment. 3. Quickly claim that he won the argument without responding to facts presented by poster. 4. Get laughed at for being a tool. 5. Perform victory dance. "Hence proved"
wouldn't be the first time
Lol..in your desperate eagerness to pick one at me and claim moral victory, you don't even look who posted what? If you don't find a way to argue against me, why use someone else post to ascribe something to me. That's why I had mention you ppl need to behave a bit like grown up or go and stick to Big Boss thread.
Most babies would pick a white doll instead of a black one in a random test. What does one infer from that ? BTW Indian television sucks donkey b@lls while on the topic. The actresses aren't all naturally fair but each of them is bleached to look fairer/whiter than the holy spirit.
Posted

Oops, wrong quote! Here is your view in the matter.

I dont think we can infer anything from that. In my opinion' date=' skin color shouldn't at all matter in dating preferences. If it does, then one would do well to try n improve in this regard.[/quote']
Posted
Lol..in your desperate eagerness to pick one at me and claim moral victory' date=' you don't even look who posted what? If you don't find a way to argue against me, why use someone else post to ascribe something to me. That's why I had mention you ppl need to behave a bit like grown up or go and stick to Big Boss thread.[/quote'] You didn't post the natural instinct claim? :dontknow:
Posted
Oops, wrong quote! Here is your view in the matter. Implying that a preference for fair skin is instinctive, further adding to Clarke's initial post about the doll experiment. So either you were swayed by his fallacious claim or it strengthened your existing beliefs. Which is it?
Extremely poor cover up job. Once again you got it handed back to you. Come better prepared next time.
Posted
You didn't post the natural instinct claim? :dontknow:
I did that but not the baby on which your buddy had created whole story. My natural instinct comment was on dating preferences thing. Your dating preferences are natural thing which you don't develop for political correctness sake. Any body would have some predispositions naturally for certain attributes . Some would like pointy elbows some would not. :cantstop:. I don't see any reason why one should make an extra attempt to change that. My question in earlier post about, nature and nurture thing, was pretty genuine. And if matters to aggrieved sense of your morality, let me tell you. I am definitely on the darker side without any qualifier.
Posted
I did that but not the baby on which your buddy had created whole story. .
and the source of this claim was? Natural instincts are not the same as personal preferences. Personal preferences are purely the prerogative of the individual but when you claim something is a natural instinct it means he/she was born with it (e.g. sexual orientation) and was not acquired.
Posted
and the source of this claim was? Natural instincts are not the same as personal preferences. Personal preferences are purely the prerogative of the individual but when you claim something is a natural instinct it means he/she was born with it (e.g. sexual orientation) and was not acquired.
what claim?
Posted
You have to define a pronoun before using it.
LOL, nice evasion tactic :giggle: What natural instinctive things do you mean here?
You can't control natural instinctive things. What next, physical beauty should also not matter, it should be inner beauty of the person?
Posted
I did that but not the baby on which your buddy had created whole story.
Yes of course, you can't be blamed for this.
My natural instinct comment was on dating preferences thing. Your dating preferences are natural thing which you don't develop for political correctness sake. Any body would have some predispositions naturally for certain attributes . Some would like pointy elbows some would not. :cantstop:. I don't see any reason why one should make an extra attempt to change that. My question in earlier post about, nature and nurture thing, was pretty genuine. And if matters to aggrieved sense of your morality, let me tell you. I am definitely on the darker side without any qualifier.
Lets consider Indian girls only and ignore the rest of the world for now. If one says that he likes to date fair girls only, ofcourse thats his choice and he is free to do whatever. But I'd think he is being narrow minded. My cousin is seeking fair-skinned girl for marriage, I tell him to his face that he is being narrow minded. The answer to nature Vs nurture thing when is comes to dating/marrying choices is most definitely nurture.
Posted
LOL, nice evasion tactic :giggle: What natural instinctive things do you mean here?
My point which was very lucid in my statement was, you don't decide yourself what matters to you in dating preferences. It comes to you naturally. For me eyes of a girl matters a most. You can't come and say that I am discriminating against girls who don't happen to have beautiful eyes and I should change that. Similarly if somebody has natural attraction towards particular skin color, you can't ask that person to change that. Of course one is wrong if that choice is being made under social pressure.
Posted
My point which was very lucid in my statement was' date=' you don't decide yourself what matters to you in dating preferences. It comes to you naturally. For me, say eyes of a girl matters a most. You can't come and say that I am discriminating against girls who don't happen to have beautiful eyes and I should change that. Similarly if somebody had natural attraction towards particular skin color, you can't ask that person to change that.[/quote'] I already addressed your point 2 posts back. What is your definition of natural instinctive things? People are free to date anyone they want with whatever physical characteristics they want. The debate here is whether a preference for fair skin among Indians is natural (people born with it) or nurture (due to their upbringing). If you claim that people in India are born with a preference for fair skin, then it is a scientific claim which needs to be backed by a source.
Posted
My point which was very lucid in my statement was' date=' you don't decide yourself what matters to you in dating preferences. It comes to you naturally. For me, say eyes of a girl matters a most. You can't come and say that I am discriminating against girls who don't happen to have beautiful eyes and I should change that. [b']Similarly if somebody has natural attraction towards particular skin color, you can't ask that person to change that. Of course one is wrong if that choice is being made under social pressure.
Once again, consider Indian girls only for now - Do you think its natural for so many Indian men to wanna date/marry fair girls only and that its not just an idea ingrained in the subconscious because of the world they grow up in?
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...