Jump to content

Duleep Trophy 2013


Recommended Posts

Posted
I think it's unfair to say poor batting. It was more like the brilliance of beuran Hendricks. Remember this is the same track where Rahane made his 86 in tough batting conditions
It was not actually a fast bowling pitch but a pitch which was getting uneven and patchy. Hendricks got benefit of that. Some balls kept low and he reversed the ball. Hendricks alone was the bowler who made a real impact being a genuine quick bowler. Our batsmen struggled against his left arm angle and pace.
Posted
It was not actually a fast bowling pitch but a pitch which was getting uneven and patchy. Hendricks got benefit of that. Some balls kept low and he reversed the ball. Hendricks alone was the bowler who made a real impact being a genuine quick bowler. Our batsmen struggled against his left arm angle and pace.
Even in the first innings, Hendricks picked up 5 for 36 where the best we could manage was pandey's 3 for 67. Hendricks is the only that stood out for me in that match. Kaul was nowhere to be seen
Posted
Even in the first innings' date=' Hendricks picked up 5 for 36 where the best we could manage was pandey's 3 for 67. Hendricks is the only that stood out for me in that match. Kaul was nowhere to be seen[/quote'] Hendricks was the lone pacer who made a real impact being a genuine quick bowler. Our batsmen struggled against his left arm angle and pace. Look at Kyle Abott who picked 7-fer on debut against Pak only got 1 wicket in the match and their off spinner Steven harmer picked 7 wickets. I would say genuine pace of Hendricks made the real difference. None of our bowlers was really quick. Today 04:24 PM
Posted
Hendricks was the lone pacer who made a real impact being a genuine quick bowler. Our batsmen struggled against his left arm angle and pace. Look at Kyle Abott who picked 7-fer on debut against Pak only got 1 wicket in the match and their off spinner Steven harmer picked 7 wickets. I would say genuine pace of Hendricks made the real difference. None of our bowlers was really quick. Today 04:24 PM
Exactly. That's why our bowlers, kaul and pandey, need to consistently hit 135-140 in FC to have any chance at international level
Posted
Exactly. That's why our bowlers' date=' kaul and pandey, need to consistently hit 135-140 in FC to have any chance at international level[/quote'] Kaul already hits around 135, saw him last year and even Pandey bowled at that pace against Mumbai in a league match, but 135 is not exactly a genuine pace. Hendricks is a genuine quick and a top upcoming talent in SA, bowls 140 plus and also has an advantage of being a left armer pacer.
Posted
Kaul already hits around 135' date=' saw him last year and even Pandey bowled at that pace against Mumbai in a league match, but 135 is not exactly a genuine pace. Hendricks is a genuine quick and a top upcoming talent in SA, bowls 140 plus and also has an advantage of being a left armer pacer.[/quote'] There is a difference between hitting in one match and hitting those speeds consistently. The only Indian bowler I can think of in the recent past to have done that was sreesanth and of course, zak.
Posted
Kaul already hits around 135' date=' saw him last year and even Pandey bowled at that pace against Mumbai in a league match, but 135 is not exactly a genuine pace. Hendricks is a genuine quick and a top upcoming talent in SA, bowls 140 plus and also has an advantage of being a left armer pacer.[/quote'] Talent wise and speed wise also trio of Sreesanth, RP Singh, Ishant Sharma were miles ahead of any of these trundlers who don't even look like international bowlers. Sorry but if this is the upcoming talent for all the away tours coming up then we are looking at repeat of 0-8.
Posted
Talent wise and speed wise also trio of Sreesanth, RP Singh, Ishant Sharma were miles ahead of any of these trundlers who don't even look like international bowlers. Sorry but if this is the upcoming talent for all the away tours coming up then we are looking at repeat of 0-8.
He does not. But those bowlers were highly inconsistent. Ishant regressed. RP never troubled batsmen on Indian pitches. Does he look international bowler or not? [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDp9vHtfLt8]Rahul Shukla 3-23 Rajasthan Royals Vs Otago Volts CLT20 2013 HD - YouTube[/ame]
Posted
There is a difference between hitting in one match and hitting those speeds consistently. The only Indian bowler I can think of in the recent past to have done that was sreesanth and of course' date=' zak.[/quote'] When did you see Sreesanth bowling that speed in domestic cricket. No bowler really bowl consistently quick domestic cricket because it is a long season and lots of match and no wants to miss by stretching in very match and get injured. In IPL, Kaul hit 140 plus. So, ability is there.
Posted
He does not. But those bowlers were highly inconsistent. Ishant regressed. RP never troubled batsmen on Indian pitches. Does he look international bowler or not? Rahul Shukla 3-23 Rajasthan Royals Vs Otago Volts CLT20 2013 HD - YouTube
thats why I said talent wise and speed wise when they started they were miles ahead. All three of them never paned out or we could have had similar bowling attack like england not express but highly efficient if they all they progressed as everyone expected them. The thing is like Aussies come to Indian every tour with new spinner and we never see them again Indian fast bowlers are like that one series of one season wonders.It is one thing if they were lost due to injuries but these buggers became lazy and never developed. That's why we never have an complete experienced team touring anywhere and pay for it. These guys not getting injuries also suggests one thing once they make it to the team and have success they stop giving full effort and just want to preserve themselves to make more money like the batsmen. Shukla has the look but his FC stats are horrible what are we missing here.I think he cannot sustain the same pace after initial overs.
Posted
When did you see Sreesanth bowling that speed in domestic cricket. No bowler really bowl consistently quick domestic cricket because it is a long season and lots of match and no wants to miss by stretching in very match and get injured. In IPL' date=' Kaul hit 140 plus. So, ability is there.[/quote'] Not in domestic, but Sree easily clocked above 135 in tests many times at least when I saw him. All of these guys operate below that for too long
Posted
thats why I said talent wise and speed wise when they started they were miles ahead. All three of them never paned out or we could have had similar bowling attack like england not express but highly efficient if they all they progressed as everyone expected them. The thing is like Aussies come to Indian every tour with new spinner and we never see them again Indian fast bowlers are like that one series of one season wonders.It is one thing if they were lost due to injuries but these buggers became lazy and never developed. That's why we never have an complete experienced team touring anywhere and pay for it. These guys not getting injuries also suggests one thing once they make it to the team and have success they stop giving full effort and just want to preserve themselves to make more money like the batsmen. Shukla has the look but his FC stats are horrible what are we missing here.I think he cannot sustain the same pace after initial overs.
Actually, Even RP and Ishant were not as good as Sid Kaul when they started but they got better once they played for Indian team. Neither Sreesanth was taking domestic cricket by storm. I still remember RP's first ODI match against Zimbabwe when he was clocking 125K in 2005. Similarly, Ishant was struggling to hit 135 in his 2nd test against Pakistan in 2007. Sid Kaul had already hits 140K in domestic cricket. He might look a short and small guy but he has some skills and more FC experience will only be beneficial for him. Regarding Shukla, he had 2 horrible years in 2010 and 2011 with stress fractures and groin injury where he missed out FC cricket. He came back last season (2012) but was struggling with confidence and fear of recurring injury, so he has not played much FC cricket in last 3 years, most of those matches were before 2010. This season will be crucial for him. When a guy has pace, sustaining pace is not that difficult. It needs good fitness which he seems to have.
Posted
Actually, Even RP and Ishant were not as good as Sid Kaul when they started but they got better once they played for Indian team. Neither Sreesanth was taking domestic cricket by storm. I still remember RP's first ODI match against Zimbabwe when he was clocking 125K in 2005. Similarly, Ishant was struggling to hit 135 in his 2nd test against Pakistan in 2007. Sid Kaul had already hits 140K in domestic cricket. He might look a short and small guy but he has some skills and more FC experience will only be beneficial for him. Regarding Shukla, he had 2 horrible years in 2010 and 2011 with stress fractures and groin injury where he missed out FC cricket. He came back last season (2012) but was struggling with confidence and fear of recurring injury, so he has not played much FC cricket in last 3 years, most of those matches were before 2010. This season will be crucial for him. Sustaining this pace is not difficult for him as he is extremely fit.
Hitting 140 once or twice means nothing sorry but kaul along with mohit sharma will be slaughtered by teams,they should be nowhere near indian team . We have trundlers galore everywhere no need to add few more to the list. Hope Shukla develops into in something, easy way into an Indian team is for a fast bowler.
Posted
Hitting 140 once or twice means nothing sorry but kaul along with mohit sharma will be slaughtered by teams,they should be nowhere near indian team . We have trundlers galore everywhere no need to add few more to the list. Hope Shukla develops into in something, easy way into an Indian team is for a fast bowler.
Anyone can be thrashed ODI and T20s these days. I am talking about tests where you need consistency.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...