Jump to content

Test and ODI team of the year


Scarves

Recommended Posts

Posted

ODI T Dilshan (SRL) S Dhawan (IND) H Amla (RSA) K Sangakkara (SRL) A de Villiers (RSA) M Dhoni (IND) © R Jadeja (IND) S Ajmal (PAK) M Starc (AUS) J Anderson (ENG) L Malinga (SRL) M McClenaghan (NZL) Test A Cook (ENG) © C Pujara (IND) H Amla (RSA) M Clarke (AUS) M Hussey (AUS) A de Villiers (RSA) M Dhoni (IND) G Swann (ENG) D Steyn (RSA) J Anderson (ENG) V Philander (RSA) R Ashwin (IND)

Posted

In what world is Kohli, Bailey and Mitchell Johnson not part of the ODI team? Also no Bell in the test team but Hussey is there? He retired in Jan....wtf ****ing ICC and their joke lists.

Posted

Kohli and Bailey are obviously the two big ones missing from the ODI team. But it is the ICC team, so really who gives a ****? I don't think players play cricket to be in the ICC team of the year. I think Bailey and Kohli and anyone else would much prefer winning series' and tournaments across the world to this nonsense.

Posted
PhilWalkerAOC @PhilWalkerAOC No Bell in ICC Test team of year despite winning Ashes on his own and no Kohli in the ODI version! Move along, nothing to see here.
This is what I call a **** list :hysterical:. Bailey and especially Kohli played their asses off this year and aren't even in the team :facepalm:
Posted

Perhaps the OP should mention that the selection time period was from August 2012 to August 2013. Kohli's stats during that period are no way near the included players (ODIs) tKV3Gx4.jpg

Posted

#1 odi batsman not in the team :cantstop:,dhoni in the test team :haha:,i guess that 224 he made was the main cause of his selection else his avg would have been 33 last season

Posted
#1 odi batsman not in the team :cantstop:' date='dhoni in the test team :haha:,i guess that 224 he made was the main cause of his selection else his avg would have been 33 last season[/quote'] yeah take out all double centuries michael clarke scored and his average would also be in 30s.:facepalm: stupid logic He has clearly been better than prior this year so his selection was inevitable.
Posted
yeah take out all double centuries michael clarke scored and his average would also be in 30s.:facepalm: stupid logic He has clearly been better than prior this year so his selection was inevitable.
no clarke would still avg 40+

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...