rkt.india Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 Also cook has struggled against Steyn and amla covers swing well with bat It's his natural ability to play ball on top of bounce and them playing of back foot while rohit plays way ahead of his body Rohit plays late, more than Kohli and Dhawan. He is the one who plays mostly under his eyes than others in this team.
Old guy Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 You need big strides when you want to play at those. If you do not want then you dont need big stride' date=' you can leave them and just play for incoming and original line covering off stump. Ball will swing away and miss the edge without getting you out. It may look poor but it wont take your wicket like yesterday.[/quote'] He got lucky in last game There is no way u call playing and missing well played he just made mockery of his technique.. Sorry but that's Steyn for u more than rohit.. Only guy who plays him well is Clarke and he plays each and every ball under his nose
Old guy Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 But Amla doesn't have to face Steyn :cantstop: That too but amla never drives the ball ahead of his body On tv its hard to see but if any one has played cricket they will know what I am saying Only way to play swing is playing with in reacj of body or under ur head... Not ahead of body like rohit did
Old guy Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 Rohit plays late' date=' more than Kohli and Dhawan. He is the one who plays mostly under his eyes than others in this team.[/quote'] Lol come on.... All his drives are ahead of his body his defence is good and like I said he will do well in middle order or in Australia but against Steyn that technique won't work while opening
Old guy Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 Btw dhawan and Kohli both make mistakes... Its not like they did any better.. Kohli just plays out swing better as his front foot moves more than rohit
vvvslaxman Posted December 7, 2013 Author Posted December 7, 2013 That too but amla never drives the ball ahead of his body On tv its hard to see but if any one has played cricket they will know what I am saying Only way to play swing is playing with in reacj of body or under ur head... Not ahead of body like rohit did Steyn is extremely potent when he gets his outswing going. When that doesn't happen he is only half potent. Remember how Jaffer and Karthik played him with absolute ease
rkt.india Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 He got lucky in last game There is no way u call playing and missing well played he just made mockery of his technique.. Sorry but that's Steyn for u more than rohit.. Only guy who plays him well is Clarke and he plays each and every ball under his nose When did Clarke played him well when it was swinging like this. Clarke never faced Steyn with new ball. Did he? Ball does not swing in Australia. Lucky was if he had got an edge. He did not need to play at those balls and he did not most of the times. His job was see him off and he did well. It is not like he was following them to play. He was in his crease and playing for original line and the ball swung away. When you are not sure how much bowl will swing, this is the best way to play because he was swinging at pace and you do not get time to adjust to swing. He played one shot coming down the track which went over slips. This is how you play either leave or play with intent.
Old guy Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 When did Clarke played him well when it was swinging like this. Clarke never faced Steyn with new ball. Did he? Ball does not swing in Australia. Lucky was if he had got an edge. He did not need to play at those balls and he did not most of the times. His job was see him off and he did well. It is not like he was following them to play. He was in his crease and playing for original line and the ball swung away. When you are not sure how much bowl will swing, this is the best way to play because he was swinging at pace and you do not get time to adjust to swing. He played one shot coming down the track which went over slips. This is how you play either leave or play with intent. He middle every ball of Steyn whole series before Perth And Clarke did play him well in South Africa on track where they got put for 47 or 49 in 2nd inning
vvvslaxman Posted December 7, 2013 Author Posted December 7, 2013 When did Clarke played him well when it was swinging like this. Clarke never faced Steyn with new ball. Did he? Ball does not swing in Australia. Lucky was if he had got an edge. He did not need to play at those balls and he did not most of the times. His job was see him off and he did well. It is not like he was following them to play. He was in his crease and playing for original line and the ball swung away. When you are not sure how much bowl will swing, this is the best way to play because he was swinging at pace and you do not get time to adjust to swing. He played one shot coming down the track which went over slips. This is how you play either leave or play with intent. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29MRZsdphso]Unplayable delivery by Dale Steyn to Clarke at WACA, 1/12/2012 - YouTube[/ame]
vvvslaxman Posted December 7, 2013 Author Posted December 7, 2013 Steyn swung much more prodigiously than usual at the wanderers.
Old guy Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 No one can convince me that inni g where he could not touch ball with bat was right way of playing Steyn It's his problem and either u guys can accept it or keep fooling urself.. He will not miss edges in next game one of them will swing less and get edge and in tests it will be same We are all here so why not wait for remaining matches...
vvvslaxman Posted December 7, 2013 Author Posted December 7, 2013 No one can convince me that inni g where he could not touch ball with bat was right way of playing Steyn It's his problem and either u guys can accept it or keep fooling urself.. He will not miss edges in next game one of them will swing less and get edge and in tests it will be same We are all here so why not wait for remaining matches... Not just Steyn.. he can struggle against anyone who has good channel outside the off stump. Vernon Philander too. Rohit has a good measure of pace. Problem is judging movement.
Old guy Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 Just because some one plays with straight bat does not means it's perfect technique Going forward is just as important I remember sachin playing outside of crease and stretching his best while playing Steyn so that can can cover some swing even though there was bounce.. To me that was his best inning in last 10 years Going forward is basic thing and if u dont do that then its limitation and not strength and I have seen enough cricket to know this Also this does not means u won't succeed but it's not ideal Same way seaway is not ideal technique but it worked and Rohit can do well too but do not spin it as its ideal thing to do or its perfect technique cos he struggled plain and simple.. Not being able to touch first 16 balls
rkt.india Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 No one can convince me that inni g where he could not touch ball with bat was right way of playing Steyn It's his problem and either u guys can accept it or keep fooling urself.. He will not miss edges in next game one of them will swing less and get edge and in tests it will be same We are all here so why not wait for remaining matches... He did not try to play them most of the time and let them go away while playing original line. You must understand what is original line. You play original like you will hardly get out on outswing if it swings a lot like that. It will beat you and if you will try to play them trying to cover the swing, you will get edge sooner or later because it is difficult to cover that kind of swing at that pace over every ball. He was not bowling 125K of PK or BK speed but 140k or more and cutting leg spinners like Warne. Any batsman who plays inside the line will look like that even Amla if he had face Steyn. Amla would have just thrown his hands at the ball and would have gotten edge. In such conditions, idea should be to play compact and close to the body which is what he was doing. Steyn bowled a few balls far too wide to play with that kind of swing. He tried to play some of them but there was too much swing.
rkt.india Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 Just because some one plays with straight bat does not means it's perfect technique Going forward is just as important I remember sachin playing outside of crease and stretching his best while playing Steyn so that can can cover some swing even though there was bounce.. To me that was his best inning in last 10 years and you forget Steyn had got him before 50, just umpire did not get the nick. It was not like he was completely comfortable against Steyn. Here ball was swinging much more with more bounce and pace.
rkt.india Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 Also this does not means u won't succeed but it's not ideal Same way seaway is not ideal technique but it worked and Rohit can do well too but do not spin it as its ideal thing to do or its perfect technique cos he struggled plain and simple.. Not being able to touch first 16 balls Nothing is ideal. Some things work for some, do not work for someone else. Rohit cannot play like Dravid. Even with a great technique, Dravid's record in SA and Aus is not so stellar on helpful tracks. Dravid had a big stride too. Even SRT's record in SA is far lower than his test record. So Survival and see off such spells is important. SA is the most difficult place for overseas batsmen. Ponting also averages in 40s in SA.
CG Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 Just because some one plays with straight bat does not means it's perfect technique Going forward is just as important I remember sachin playing outside of crease and stretching his best while playing Steyn so that can can cover some swing even though there was bounce.. To me that was his best inning in last 10 years Going forward is basic thing and if u dont do that then its limitation and not strength and I have seen enough cricket to know this Also this does not means u won't succeed but it's not ideal Same way seaway is not ideal technique but it worked and Rohit can do well too but do not spin it as its ideal thing to do or its perfect technique cos he struggled plain and simple.. Not being able to touch first 16 balls He left 10 Of those defensively.Its rohit role in the team to see off the new ball with dhawan being the aggressive one.
SLICKR392 Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 He left 10 Of those. Hardly 4 or 5. He was dancing around in the rest of those.
CG Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 Hardly 4 or 5. He was dancing around in the rest of those. Dancing around? He played and missed few peaches which were more like legbreaks.
SLICKR392 Posted December 7, 2013 Posted December 7, 2013 Dancing around? He played and missed few peaches which were more like legbreaks. How well did Kohli bat against Steyn compared to Rohit? Rohit was mostly within the crease on the back foot trying to survive. Rohit did get some insane deliveries but some are suggesting he did well against Steyn. He was lucky while trying to survive that burst.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now