Tailender Posted March 3, 2014 Posted March 3, 2014 Two slog sixes and Afridi won it by fluke. It could have gone any where! No cricket with Pakis. Never forget 26/11 yeah but keep increasing economic ties because that makes sense :cantstop::two_thumbs_up:
Tailender Posted March 3, 2014 Posted March 3, 2014 SO India wasnt playing Pakistan because we thought they were a poor team? Thats new to me :hmmm: ANd I thought it was the terrorism... Really? So that means BCCI is willing to sell a principled stance for money? 26/11 would be forgotten if Pakistan voted for your proposal? Is that how easily you guys forget the death of your people? Stop saying it's terrorism because we all know it isn't. That's such bullshit. If it was your board wouldn't offer to play just for one ****ing vote. :whack:
Switchblade Posted March 3, 2014 Author Posted March 3, 2014 :hysterical: yeah i've seen kohli celebrate and cry like that against the lungans... Well in the past as well its your players who have come out giving a lot of statements 2011 WC Gul said something that how he will get Sehwag and Sachin or for the Champions Trophy Saeed Ajmal said that we will beat India the statements usually comes from Pakistani players haven't seen any Indian player claiming he would do this or that against Pakistan.
Switchblade Posted March 3, 2014 Author Posted March 3, 2014 Really? So that means BCCI is willing to sell a principled stance for money? 26/11 would be forgotten if Pakistan voted for your proposal? Is that how easily you guys forget the death of your people? Stop saying it's terrorism because we all know it isn't. That's such bullshit. If it was your board wouldn't offer to play just for one ****ing vote. :whack: I said that on the other thread as well which got locked that I do agree that BCCI should be consistent as they invited Pakistan back in December 2012 then inviting them in CLT20 and then offering to play them they should not do that should be consistent with their policies.Its quite simple the political issues should be resolved and appropriate actions should be taken then cricketing ties should be revived.I hope now that this thread does not turn out to be another mud slinging thread or India vs Pakistan finger pointing thread.
jf1gp_1 Posted March 3, 2014 Posted March 3, 2014 would be funny to see mood change if pak lose to BD tomorrow.
Roshanrocks Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Really? So that means BCCI is willing to sell a principled stance for money? 26/11 would be forgotten if Pakistan voted for your proposal? Is that how easily you guys forget the death of your people? Stop saying it's terrorism because we all know it isn't. That's such bullshit. If it was your board wouldn't offer to play just for one ****ing vote. :whack: My response was to this statement "I told them if they continue to do well and improve their rankings and standing then other boards including the Indians will want to play against us and our revenue generation will increase," he said. What are YOU on about? India stopped bilateral series with Pak coz of the 26/11 Terrorist Attack, not because of Pakistan's low rankings :whack: :--D
Temujin Khaghan Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 pakistanis are ever ready with their begging bowls...:cantstop:
Midfielder Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 One fluke win against a rugged side and these clowns have their panties in a twist. These thugs export terror across the border' date=' kill innocent Indians, why would we want to play them?[/quote'] this
Iconoclast Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Indo Pak test series is way overdue .. we've been playing plenty of ODIs here and there but the real drama and passion comes out in the longer format.
Iconoclast Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 pakistanis are ever ready with their begging bowls...:cantstop: Short term memory fail .. Pakistan was the only country to resist the big three despite Srini Mama's promises of bilateral series.
Logical Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Fluke win eh? If umpires would have given out Ashwin and Jadeja (both were out) then this match wouldnt have been even close.
Midfielder Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Short term memory fail .. Pakistan was the only country to resist the big three despite Srini Mama's promises of bilateral series. Pak resisted the big three because of India. They were perfectly happy when big two were Eng and Aus. Moment India came into picture their pubic hair were on fire.
Midfielder Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Fluke win eh? If umpires would have given out Ashwin and Jadeja (both were out) then this match wouldnt have been even close. definitely not a fluke win. illegal because of chucker action but fluke definitely not.
saneindian Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 U-19 side played the WC in UAE, BCCI may soon agree to a test series in UAE as well. Can;t see the team traveling to Pakistan yet
Midfielder Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 U-19 side played the WC in UAE' date=' BCCI may soon agree to a test series in UAE as well. Can;t see the team traveling to Pakistan yet[/quote'] that would be a sad day because they opposed india. i say heck with them.
div Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Short term memory fail .. Pakistan was the only country to resist the big three despite Srini Mama's promises of bilateral series. "The victory is good for us because it now puts us in a position where we can push the Indian cricket officials to play more often with us and it will also ensure that we get matches against top sides in the new FTP over the next cycle of eight years," he said.
IndianRenegade Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 U-19 side played the WC in UAE' date=' BCCI may soon agree to a test series in UAE as well. Can;t see the team traveling to Pakistan yet[/quote'] We always play ICC tournaments against them no matter the situation (we played them during Kargil back-stab), its the bilateral series that is a question...
NareshK Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Originally Posted by Iconoclast Short term memory fail .. Pakistan was the only country to resist the big three despite Srini Mama's promises of bilateral series. "The victory is good for us because it now puts us in a position where we can push the Indian cricket officials to play more often with us and it will also ensure that we get matches against top sides in the new FTP over the next cycle of eight years," he said. How well they are resisting ? PCB cant wait to earn more cash. In fact, they were negotiating for more money, tours and IPL participation in exchange for a vote and when they were turned down, they acted as if they were opposing. Who are you fooling ?
Temujin Khaghan Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Short term memory fail .. Pakistan was the only country to resist the big three despite Srini Mama's promises of bilateral series. and now they shamelessly want a series with evil Indians... :hysterical:
Desi Cartman Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Latifa has a point, in dhonis absence it would have made sense to play UV
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now