Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Sandeep and Bhuveneshwar Kumar are doing well considering that medium pacers are supposed to be fodder on subcontinental pitches' date= if some people are to be believed.
Medium pacers have been the most successful in T20s , reasonably successful in ODIs and least successful in tests. If you look at the top test pacers with lowest averages or strike rates and with 200 + wickets, almost all are either fast or tall, bouncy and atleast fast medium. If you look at top ODI pacers... there are a few medium pacers although most are fast or fast-medium. T20 does not have much history but in the 7 or 8 years, we have seen a lot of medium pacers have been among the top pacers.I often feel that medium pacers will be far more consistent in T20s.
Posted

Our test pace attack in england shud have 4 pacers playing in eleven n jadeja. I am considering jaddu cud be better than Ashwin in england. Shammi varun umesh bk are our best bets. If any one is not doing well ishwar cud be played.

Posted
Bumrah is very raw at the moment.His bowling is onedimensional.He does not have any varities
Agree but he can bowl good yorkers and can be decent in LOIs.
Posted
Bumrah is very raw at the moment.His bowling is onedimensional.He does not have any varities
Most of our pacers are trying too many things and straying in line and length. In the T20s , it is not bad to have a couple of pacers who try things they are good at . In the longer versions, I have seen Bumrah try the outswinger too.
Posted

Nechim bowled steadily around 136-137. Aaron at his usual pace. He hurried both Macculum and Smith and got top edges when they were attacking which proved decisive in the end.

×
×
  • Create New...