bulbul Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 More ministers will be inducted. WTF? What happened to minimum government? Not pleased. There is option to go till 81 so 55 to 60 will be ok
Lord Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 He is member of Rajya Sabha. Rajya Sabha members are not elected by general people though.Him losing means people don't want him even in LS.So he shouldnt get such important portfolios no?Only Lok Sabha members should be considered imo as they are elected by people
ravishingravi Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 Rajya Sabha members are not elected by general people though.Him losing means people don't want him even in LS.So he shouldnt get such important portfolios no?Only Lok Sabha members should be considered imo as they are elected by people No. It doesn't mean that. It means they wanted Amarinder more than Jaitley. Scenario could have been different elsewhere.
Sachin=GOD Posted May 26, 2014 Author Posted May 26, 2014 Rajya Sabha members are not elected by general people though.Him losing means people don't want him even in LS.So he shouldnt get such important portfolios no?Only Lok Sabha members should be considered imo as they are elected by people My view is that they should take the best possible persons for the job. If it means sending them to Rajya Sabha then so be it. Not being a member of Lok Sabha shouldn;t be a reason to keep away someone as good as Arun jaitley from the Cabinet IMO.
jalebi_bhai Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 Rajya Sabha members are not elected by general people though.Him losing means people don't want him even in LS.So he shouldnt get such important portfolios no?Only Lok Sabha members should be considered imo as they are elected by people You need your best people as ministers of the Executive........LS election are mostly popularity contests......most popular doesn't mean most efficient....
Lord Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 No. It doesn't mean that. It means they wanted Amarinder more than Jaitley. Scenario could have been different elsewhere. He contested from only one seat and lost there.So not a member of Lok Sabha,the House elected by the people .Whether it'd been different in other constituency is hypothetical.
Lord Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 You need your best people as ministers of the Executive........LS election are mostly popularity contests......most popular doesn't mean most efficient.... You mean general people don't vote based on efficiency and someone else knows more?:hmmm:
Lord Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 My view is that they should take the best possible persons for the job. If it means sending them to Rajya Sabha then so be it. Not being a member of Lok Sabha shouldn;t be a reason to keep away someone as good as Arun jaitley from the Cabinet IMO. Best persons according to whom? I am just asking about the process,no issues with Jaitley ofcourse :nice:
bulbul Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 I forgot Venky Naidu is RS member from Karnataka :woot:
Sachin=GOD Posted May 26, 2014 Author Posted May 26, 2014 He contested from only one seat and lost there.So not a member of Lok Sabha' date='the House elected by the people .Whether it'd been different in other constituency is hypothetical.[/quote'] The constitution doesn't say that Ministers need to be from Lok Sabha only. Also, there are some extremely capable people who can't win Lok Sabha election but can do extremely well in administration - you need such people in Govt and the only way is Rajya Sabha. So no problems at all IMO.
ravishingravi Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 You mean general people don't vote based on efficiency and someone else knows more?:hmmm: Yes. Hate to break this. But that is practical reality.
Sachin=GOD Posted May 26, 2014 Author Posted May 26, 2014 Best persons according to whom? I am just asking about the process,no issues with Jaitley ofcourse :nice: According to capability for holding a portfolio.
Sachin=GOD Posted May 26, 2014 Author Posted May 26, 2014 You mean general people don't vote based on efficiency and someone else knows more?:hmmm: In many cases, yes. For ex - Rahul Gandhi has done nothing at all and has got no capability except his surname but he has been elected three times.
Sachin=GOD Posted May 26, 2014 Author Posted May 26, 2014 You mean general people don't vote based on efficiency and someone else knows more?:hmmm: In many cases, yes. For ex - Rahul Gandhi has done nothing at all and has got no capability except his surname but he has been elected three times.
Lord Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 According to capability for holding a portfolio. Who decides that?Shouldnt that be one of the criteria on which people vote?
bulbul Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 LoL this is the country where PM is from RS for last 10 years..what is big deal having ministers from there.
Lord Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 According to capability for holding a portfolio. Who decides that?Shouldnt that be one of the criteria on which people vote?
Lord Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 According to capability for holding a portfolio. Who decides that?Shouldnt that be one of the criteria on which people vote?
ravishingravi Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 Two ingenious elements. VK Singh to look after north east. And Kiren Rijiju BJP MP from arunachal.
Shunya Posted May 26, 2014 Posted May 26, 2014 so Sadanand Gowda as Railways Minister...is he any good?...lot of things to be changed in railways...and its welcome move to get a a non Bihari-WB this time
Recommended Posts