Jump to content

Speeds and Performances of Pacers and Spinners


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

That is a different issue.

 

But Indians want to pick 130 k pacers as swing bowlers and that is not necessary as one can swing at 140 k+ too. 

That's a ever going problem with our experts. Everyone things pace can't be combined with accuracy. Bumrah, Siraj, Shami all are fast and accurate.

 

Anyway, I was somehow happy that Naseem was bowling so wide, I knew he is wasting the new ball and if our batters can survive that, they will cash in later.

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

That's a ever going problem with our experts. Everyone things pace can't be combined with accuracy. Bumrah, Siraj, Shami all are fast and accurate.

 

Exactly !

 

17 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

Anyway, I was somehow happy that Naseem was bowling so wide, I knew he is wasting the new ball and if our batters can survive that, they will cash in later.

 

Rohit was trying to play too much on the front although Naseem was bowling back of a length.

 

If he had tried cut shots instead of drives, like Gill did against Naseem, he would have scored more. 

Edited by express bowling
Posted
1 hour ago, singhvivek141 said:

Naseem is moving ball the ball, but his radar is little wide

 

He hits hard lengths, suddenly bowls one fuller attacking the stumps

I like it,looks simple but needs practice plus he generates lift

Posted

Naseem’s consistency is the last two years makes him top 2 in the world for me. Nobody does what he does at 140 kph plus. So unlucky with those drops and play and misses.

Posted
1 hour ago, singhvivek141 said:

Shaheen is just trundling on this pitch at 135 kph.

 

135 was the lowest he bowled. Often in the 140s. His problem was the length. He did not pull his length back in time. Kept bowling half volleys. Hope he learns from this.

Posted (edited)
59 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

Exactly !

 

 

Rohit was trying to play too much on the front although Naseem was bowling back of a length.

 

If he had tried cut shots instead of drives, like Gill did against Naseem, he would have scored more. 

He was bowling on hard lengths close to 2,3rd stump making it difficult to cut

Yes,had he been 135-140 could have been easy to make room to play cut

Edited by Suhaan
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, the don said:

135 was the lowest he bowled. Often in the 140s. His problem was the length. He did not pull his length back in time. Kept bowling half volleys. Hope he learns from this.

His lowest was 134..and he was often in under 140.

Edited by singhvivek141
Posted
2 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

His lowest was 134..and he was often in under 140.

Siraj’s lowest was 128 in the last game and he bowled multiple bowls under 133. 
Please post the average speed for the three bowlers from cricviz

Posted
Just now, the don said:

Siraj’s lowest was 128 in the last game and he bowled multiple bowls under 133. 
Please post the average speed for the three bowlers from cricviz

His problem was the wrong length he bowled in the early overs.

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, the don said:

Siraj’s lowest was 128 in the last game and he bowled multiple bowls under 133. 
Please post the average speed for the three bowlers from cricviz

Don't change the goal post please, accept that you're wrong and move on.

 

I have never mentioned how quick Siraj is, he is a fast medium and everyone who post regularly on this forum knows that. I am not discussing their effectiveness.

 

Edited by singhvivek141
Posted
7 minutes ago, the don said:

His problem was the wrong length he bowled in the early overs.

Shaheen isn't a very capable back of length bowler, his strength is to bowl full and swing the ball. Once that's negotiated it's very easily to negate him.

 

Naseem was bowling well, but I would still say that he was going too wide. He actually wasted the second new ball considering when Shaheen was ineffective.

Posted
16 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

Don't change the goal post please, accept that you're wrong and move on.

 

I have never mentioned how quick Siraj is, he is a fast medium and everyone who post regularly on this forum knows that. I am not discussing their effectiveness.

 

The point was he bowled an average pace of around 138-139 kph which is sufficient not his optimum.

problem was wrong length.

Posted
6 hours ago, singhvivek141 said:

Who, Kartik ?

I only saw the highlights and his deliveries looked day & light quicker than rest.

The Yorker was a sure shot 90mph +...

 

One thing I like that he makes the commentators talk about his pace. Every commentator is saying that he is fast and batters are late to play him.

 

Indian commentators aren't too bright,I have better judgement than them.

Posted
1 minute ago, MediumPacer said:

In county cricket.

 

unadkat struggled on debut in div 2 for sussex .

 

 

umesh was okish for essex in div 1,got 3 wickets...after struggling last season for surrey.

Umesh is always like that, where he declined is his pace.

At an age of 36 he simply doesn't have the gas to bowl 140+ consistently.

 

Unadkut representing us at any level itself is a shame. Selectors have no idea whom to pick and whom not to.

In Asian games as well we're going with trundler army of Avesh, Arsh, Mavi & Mukesh :facepalm:. Should have sent Harshit, Mayank, Hangargekar & Tyagi instead.

Posted
4 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

Umesh is always like that, where he declined is his pace.

At an age of 36 he simply doesn't have the gas to bowl 140+ consistently.

 

Unadkut representing us at any level itself is a shame. Selectors have no idea whom to pick and whom not to.

In Asian games as well we're going with trundler army of Avesh, Arsh, Mavi & Mukesh :facepalm:. Should have sent Harshit, Mayank, Hangargekar & Tyagi instead.

I dont know why they dropped bhuvi, if they will play trundlers then he is still our best trundler in t20s.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, MediumPacer said:

Unadkat batting at no 11 and cant get a wicket,Arshdeep played 5 matches and struggled playing for kent in div 1.

 

 

Only saini did well playing for kent last season.

 

And yet, Unadkat is playing tests for India and Saini could not get a single game. 

Edited by express bowling
Posted

The first 24 overs of this match showed that the Pakistan pace attack is being over-rated. They play too many matches against minnows and this has helped them build a reputation that is bigger than their ability. 

 

Our batters should always look to attack them like today and not be too cautious in their approach   

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...