Lord Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 that is exactly what is happening right now and bi of chucking iwll not even be reported going over 15 to 20 sometimes is understandable and i do not even think you get banned for bowling 1 odd deliver like that if average is much lower. but what we saw recently was complete joke with bowlers literally throwing deliveries I am asking of raising limit to 20 too.Not supporting Ajmal,Sena like cases as I already mentioned
Lord Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 We are not playing baseball. If you chuck you are not a Bowler with all the slogging and agricultural shots,its difficult to make out.Or should we concern ourselves to bowlers only
Old guy Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 The other countries that banned it are also unable to produce a good world class offie except Swann. Ofcourse bowling off spin is possible but it'll be only be a defensive option as batsmen can play them all day long.You won't see them troubling any good batsmen unless pitches are friendly.Even then only some can do it. then make pitches favor them and there were plenty of good off spinners ashwin is one of them and will only get better btw in most of those countries off spinners even chuckers included never did well ..ajmal only did well at uae and not really in south africa or australia infact swann was the only off spinner in world to bowl well on those tracks all the chuckers included / so this argument is wrong anyway..of spinners in general even with chucking did nothing away from subcontinent while lyon and swann seem to be doing better with straight arm . issue here is tracks not elbow
kira Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 with all the slogging and agricultural shots' date='its difficult to make out.Or should we concern ourselves to bowlers only[/quote'] LOL you did not just say that, tell me you did not just say that comparing sloggin with chucking :facepalm: are you from padosi land? Because that is classic lahorilogic
Old guy Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 I am asking of raising limit to 20 too.Not supporting Ajmal' date='Sena like cases as I already mentioned[/quote'] and soon bowlers will cross it and then people will ask for 25-30-40! all the chuckers who got banned dd not only crossed 15 degres but 40! your argument would have been better if ajmal was chucking at 16 degrees of 17 degrees but 15-20 will make no difference those who are chucking for significant advantage are going over a lot more while others are easily staying within 15 degrees with no problem
Old guy Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 LOL you did not just say that, tell me you did not just say that comparing sloggin with chucking :facepalm: are you from padosi land? Because that is classic lahorilogic please do not attack poster while discussing if you have problem with his point explain it calmly .
kira Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 please do not attack poster while discussing if you have problem with his point explain it calmly . I didn't even start attacking dude. Read his comment, the only reply to that is :facepalm:
Old guy Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 I didn't even start attacking dude. Read his comment' date=' the only reply to that is :facepalm:[/quote'] atleast first try:cantstop:
Cricket_Hacker Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 padosis unable to explain how a bowler playing for an IPL team was reported :hysterical:
Lord Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 then make pitches favor them and there were plenty of good off spinners ashwin is one of them and will only get better btw in most of those countries off spinners even chuckers included never did well ..ajmal only did well at uae and not really in south africa or australia infact swann was the only off spinner in world to bowl well on those tracks all the chuckers included / so this argument is wrong anyway..of spinners in general even with chucking did nothing away from subcontinent while lyon and swann seem to be doing better with straight arm . issue here is tracks not elbow No I am asking of adding variety like doosra.Its proven impossible to do it under current limits.but its an exciting delivery which troubles batsmen.Swann was good but not many bowlers will do well without doosra imo in today's age Tracks need to be better too along with longer boundaries
Old guy Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 No I am asking of adding variety like doosra.Its proven impossible to do it under current limits.but its an exciting delivery which troubles batsmen.Swann was good but not many bowlers will do well without doosra imo in today's age Tracks need to be better too along with longer boundaries let them develop other legal variation like flight,change of pace ,and for change turning a ball! what next its impossible to bowl quick at 170 kmph let them bend arm ?
Lord Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 LOL you did not just say that, tell me you did not just say that comparing sloggin with chucking :facepalm: are you from padosi land? Because that is classic lahorilogic dude where did I compare?I don't get this baseball argument.There the ball is thrown at full toss from lot closer.you compared that with this. slogging bit was to counter that:--D
Lord Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 let them develop other legal variation like flight,change of pace ,and for change turning a ball! what next its impossible to bowl quick at 170 kmph let them bend arm ? Yeah I am all for that (first part:cantstop:) but it often doesnt prove enough nowadays.You either both types of innovations or dont allow switch hit etc too.I am personally in favour of both :--D Tracks are biggest issue but that doesnt seem like changing atleast in LOIs. Quicks dont need to bowl 170 kmph to be effective.But I doubt whether under current conditions offies can survive without these variations
Old guy Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 Yeah I am all for that (first part:cantstop:) but it often doesnt prove enough nowadays.You either both types of innovations or dont allow switch hit etc too.I am personally in favour of both :--D Tracks are biggest issue but that doesnt seem like changing atleast in LOIs. Quicks dont need to bowl 170 kmph to be effective.But I doubt whether under current conditions offies can survive without these variations there is not a single chucker after murali who did well away from subcontinent so this argument does not really stands tbh
Old guy Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 its funny even today before these bans only 2 bowlers who looked little effective in those countries were bowling with classical action with no doosra
JaFanatic Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 Was he ever tested?how many degrees did he straighten his arm by? Dont know have seen many saying him as having a clean action and the few ones who say he is a chucker are well known hardcore pakistan haters AFAIK
rkt.india Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 No I am asking of adding variety like doosra.Its proven impossible to do it under current limits.but its an exciting delivery which troubles batsmen.Swann was good but not many bowlers will do well without doosra imo in today's age Tracks need to be better too along with longer boundaries Daniel Vettori is one of the best LOI bowler who never bowled doosra, never turned the ball much, solely depended on pace and length variations. Bowlers who are chucking too need pitches to do well. Same Narine never did well in England and NZ with all his carom balls and chucking. So, it is unfair on other bowlers who don't chuck.
Old guy Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 Daniel Vettori is one of the best LOI bowler who never bowled doosra' date=' never turned the ball much, solely depended on pace and length variations. Bowlers who are chucking too need pitches to do well. Same Narine never did well in England and NZ with all his carom balls and chucking. So, it is unfair on other bowlers who don't chuck.[/quote'] +1 its not really about bat vs ball its about countries which allow chucking vs countries who ban them also between bowlers who bowl within limit and outside . even riight now best bowler away from subcontinent from subcontinent was herath who does not chucks ..
Lord Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 Daniel Vettori is one of the best LOI bowler who never bowled doosra' date=' never turned the ball much, solely depended on pace and length variations. Bowlers who are chucking too need pitches to do well. Same Narine never did well in England and NZ with all his carom balls and chucking. So, it is unfair on other bowlers who don't chuck.[/quote'] Yeah exceptions are always there but obviously having one more variation will be even better theoretically. Its like batting.Guys like Sachin,Kohli did well in ODIs without needing switch hits,dilscoops etc.But those having those shots will always be more advantageous over those who don't on a normal basis. My point is either allow both or none.
Old guy Posted September 30, 2014 Posted September 30, 2014 exceptions ? you still have not named 1 chucker who did well outside of subcontinent comparable to herath,swann or even lyon!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now