zakk Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 Pakistan hi nahi balki sab teams ki bajadege :band:
Guldozer Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 Dude why on every thread you keep on bringing that Asia cup fluke victory thanks to short boundaries and Indian C team? What nerves Pak team showed when we beat you 'AGAIN' in t'20 WC 2014? What nerves Pak team showed on Champions trophy 2013 when they bundled out for 161? What nerves Pak team showed when we beat you in t'20 WC 2012? What nerves Pak team showed when Virat Kohli raped you in Asia Cup 2012? What nerves Pak team showed when Misbah choked in Mohali 2011? What nerves Pak team showed when Bhajji raped Amir in Asia cup 2010? What nerves Pak team showed when we beat you in 2009 WC t'20 warm up game, a year Pak went on to become champions but still couldn't beat India? I can go further but it will be pretty embarrasing for you. Please note, I am not even bringing the last 2 U19 WC defeats against the hands of India. I am not even bringing the Dual defeats (league game and the final) against India in the U23 Asia emerging cup tournament 2013. A final before which your shameless captain Hamad Azam told he is looking to seek revenge of the league game, only to got out in a duck http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/638939.html Heck even our blind team beats you. Bottomline is we beat you mostly (not always ofcourse) when ever and where ever we play. And you want to cling into that one solitary victory in Asia Cup? If you give Asia cup so importance why don't check the Asia Cup record between the two sides? We have beaten you in 2010, 2012 but no one keeps gloating about it daily. I know beating India might be the biggest achievement for you guys, so its that much special for you that Asia Cup. But for us, it means nothing. That is why India sent a C team in that tournament. Lets face it India really don't care about Pakistan like the way Pakistan care for us. What to do, we have chota dil bro :(( Err...don't turn this into a India-Pakistan debate. I was letting the poster know how baseless his argument was, considering the last ODI we played nerves won us the game. 9 off 4 balls with 1 wicket left against arch rivals; if that doesn't require nerves then I don't know what does. None of the examples you have given match those done by Miandad and Afridi, so I don't know what you are on about. And you beat us mostly? Are you serious? Despite the superior world cup stats India's overall record against Pakistan is rubbish. Also a lot of the posters here like to say that they don't care about the Pakistan. It's understandable, it must not be easy suffering from complexes. Bottomline is, you need to get the bias and hate out of the way, and actually give credit where it's due. Do the world a favour.
vvvslaxman Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 Pakistan is a rubbish team as well. Also India will turn into bullies when they play Pakistan.. But here is an interesting thing. India will miss their lucky mascot against Pakistan. Sachin.
div Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 Err...don't turn this into a India-Pakistan debate. I was letting the poster know how baseless his argument was, considering the last ODI we played nerves won us the game. 9 off 4 balls with 1 wicket left against arch rivals; if that doesn't require nerves then I don't know what does. None of the examples you have given match those done by Miandad and Afridi, so I don't know what you are on about. And you beat us mostly? Are you serious? Despite the superior world cup stats India's overall record against Pakistan is rubbish. Also a lot of the posters here like to say that they don't care about the Pakistan. It's understandable, it must not be easy suffering from complexes. Bottomline is, you need to get the bias and hate out of the way, and actually give credit where it's due. Do the world a favour. Afridi and nerves :haha: As it turned out, Shahid Afridi hit two sixes to win the game for his team. That's what went into the record books: Afridi hits two sixes off Ashwin and Pakistan beat India in a nail-biter in the Asia Cup. But if you looked at it with a cricketing eye, here is what really happened. Ashwin bowled two good deliveries, on which Afridi mistimed two lofted shots. Both times the ball did not hit the middle of Afridi's bat - it was well away from the sweet spot - but it still sailed over the short boundaries. Those two sixes landed just a metre or two over the rope. Why did this happen? Modern bats.
-Robin- Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 Afridi and nerves :haha: Bhajji's finish in 2010 Asia cup was far better
Guldozer Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 Bhajji's finish in 2010 Asia cup was far better Delusional or what?
Austin 3:!6 Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 Err...don't turn this into a India-Pakistan debate. I was letting the poster know how baseless his argument was' date=' considering the last ODI we played nerves won us the game. 9 off 4 balls with 1 wicket left against arch rivals; if that doesn't require nerves then I don't know what does. [b']None of the examples you have given match those done by Miandad and Afridi, so I don't know what you are on about. And you beat us mostly? Are you serious? Despite the superior world cup stats India's overall record against Pakistan is rubbish. Also a lot of the posters here like to say that they don't care about the Pakistan. It's understandable, it must not be easy suffering from complexes. Bottomline is, you need to get the bias and hate out of the way, and actually give credit where it's due. Do the world a favour. How is a last ball six hit by Miandad in a JAMODI's in Sharjah better than all the phanities we have given you in ICC events? What difference is Bhajji's last ball six of Amir to that of Miandad's? Your mindset? Balaji's six to Akhtar? That was also JAMODI right? Afridi?? :cantstop: You know his record vs India don't you? And no we don't care about Pakistan not because of complex (jesus christ LMAO :hysterical:)...we don't care because of following reason: a)Your team plays most boring brand of cricket. They still live in 1992 and go by rules set by Imran Khan. b)You team is not marketable enough like say Eng, Aust, SA c)Your team doesn't test our boys like say a Johnson or Steyn or Ab Devilliers would do. d)Your team mostly consists of glorified T20 sloggers (your T20 ranking suggests that) and quite frankly players like Umar Amin, Maqsood etc. would not even feature in Ranji set up. e)You team cries conspiracy when ICC bans chuckers. f) etc. etc.
-Robin- Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 Delusional or what? A clean hit is better than blind slogs any day. Afridi's hits cleared the boundary coz of tiny boundaries
the don Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 How is a last ball six hit by Miandad in a JAMODI's in Sharjah better than all the phanities we have given you in ICC events? . Well the Miandad six was in a final and according to Indian ex cricketers it scarred Indian cricket for life , India was never a great team to begin with and eventually turned into punching bags after the six , the onset of 90 s saw India being virtual minnows , so i think the six had quite an impact , also it ruined chetan sharma's career , unfortunately for him.
Austin 3:!6 Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 Well the Miandad six was in a final and according to Indian ex cricketers it scarred Indian cricket for life ' date= India was never a great team to begin with and eventually turned into punching bags after the six , the onset of 90 s saw India being virtual minnows , so i think the six had quite an impact , also it ruined chetan sharma's career , unfortunately for him. Yea right. Go and give this theory in PP where people might actually believe your delusional story. Like the way they believe Inzy is better than Tendu and Razzaq is better than Kapil Dev. Or like the way they believe Pak lost that WC game against Bangla to grant them test status. Or 2011 WC semi final was fixed In ICF they will laugh at you and rightly so
SLICKR392 Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 Well the Miandad six was in a final and according to Indian ex cricketers it scarred Indian cricket for life ' date= India was never a great team to begin with and eventually turned into punching bags after the six , the onset of 90 s saw India being virtual minnows , so i think the six had quite an impact , also it ruined chetan sharma's career , unfortunately for him. I heard the quick loss of wickets in the last game against England was due to the aftereffect scare of Miandad's 6 decades back.
Austin 3:!6 Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 BTW why am I arguing for Pakistan out of all teams. :headshake: Anyway that was my last post in this thread :nice:
Cricketics Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 Well the Miandad six was in a final and according to Indian ex cricketers it scarred Indian cricket for life ' date=' India was never a great team to begin with and eventually turned into punching bags after the six , the onset of 90 s saw India being virtual minnows , so i think the six had quite an impact , also it ruined chetan sharma's career , unfortunately for him.[/quote'] This is so like Sanjay Manjrekar, who creates a drama out of a match. I remember watching this game a lot on ten sports where you could hear Manjrekar sharing his view about the game simultaneously, and he keeps saying this, that and how it affected Indian team. for next great amount of years till 1996. We did meanwhile beat Pakistan in1992 world cup, which was a pretty big game at that time.
the don Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 ^^yeah you are right sanjay manjrekar has said it numerous times and quite a few others too
Guldozer Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 How is a last ball six hit by Miandad in a JAMODI's in Sharjah better than all the phanities we have given you in ICC events? What difference is Bhajji's last ball six of Amir to that of Miandad's? Your mindset? Balaji's six to Akhtar? That was also JAMODI right? Afridi?? :cantstop: You know his record vs India don't you? And no we don't care about Pakistan not because of complex (jesus christ LMAO :hysterical:)...we don't care because of following reason: a)Your team plays most boring brand of cricket. They still live in 1992 and go by rules set by Imran Khan. b)You team is not marketable enough like say Eng, Aust, SA c)Your team doesn't test our boys like say a Johnson or Steyn or Ab Devilliers would do. d)Your team mostly consists of glorified T20 sloggers (your T20 ranking suggests that) and quite frankly players like Umar Amin, Maqsood etc. would not even feature in Ranji set up. e)You team cries conspiracy when ICC bans chuckers. f) etc. etc. You are too biased too have an argument with. But out of all the retarded arguments, you call us boring. :hysterical: I tell you one thing which isn't boring, and that is reading your posts. :haha:
Guldozer Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 Yea right. Go and give this theory in PP where people might actually believe your delusional story. Like the way they believe Inzy is better than Tendu and Razzaq is better than Kapil Dev. Or like the way they believe Pak lost that WC game against Bangla to grant them test status. Or 2011 WC semi final was fixed In ICF they will laugh at you and rightly so The way people think Kapil Dev is better than Imran and that Bhuvneshwar is better than Junaid is equally absurd.
SLICKR392 Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 The way people think Kapil Dev is better than Imran and that Bhuvneshwar is better than Junaid is equally absurd. What exactly makes Junaid better than Bhuvi? Base your facts rather than just sprouting baseless posts. Bhuvi was the MOTS for India in his first overseas tour. Do you even want to talk about Junaid's? ODIs, absolutely hammered him in CT, where Junaid stats was worth a slot in Comedy Central.
Guldozer Posted January 21, 2015 Posted January 21, 2015 And what a shame that people can't do simple maths here. Since when is 3 off 2 with 3 wickets remaining better than 4 off 1 with 1 wicket remaining, and that too in a tournament final. Since when is 3 off 2 with 3 wickets remaining better than 9 off 4 with 1 wicket remaining. You have seriously crossed the limit of being delusional. Who' date=' you? Yeah![/quote'] You're funny...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now