Bleed-Blue Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 Uthappa past his prime? He is better cricketer after 2012 :hello:Skindia Wasn't Talking about Him.
Mindreader Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 Sehwag gambhir uv not even in contract list,their career is over
Mindreader Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 When skindia gets unbanned u'll get proof that m not skindia
rahulrulezz Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 ISharma has been the biggest curse for India. Has played on all overseas tours of Eng, Aus, RSA n NZ with the greenest pitches possible and the guy has not won us a single test for us. Don't understand this unconditional love from our fans towards Ishant.
Number Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 Don't know why I think he could have been useful. He was pretty good in Aus ODIs in 2008 CB series. Even half of that Ishant would have made some diff to our side.
vijay50 Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 When skindia gets unbanned u'll get proof that m not skindia So how do you know skindia got banned, unless you are:winky:
vijay50 Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 Replacements if they couldnt not pass the fitness test ( I wish) Rohit - Sehwag Dhawan - Uthappa Jadeja - Yuvraj Ishant - Mohit I want the above.Hope Rosharma, Dhawan and Jaddu fail the fitness test.
Mindreader Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 Leander paes won aus open mix doubles,he is in good form to replace dhawan
Shivaji bhonsle Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 ISharma has been the biggest curse for India. Has played on all overseas tours of Eng' date=' Aus, RSA n NZ with the greenest pitches possible and the guy has not won us a single test for us. Don't understand this unconditional love from our fans towards Ishant.[/quote'] He is hitting the seam these days and getting the movement off the pitch which was missing for the past few years. If you can remember, he was bowling cross seam stuff at the beginning of 2014. But, these days he is getting good movement off the pitch because he is hitting the seam correctly. He is going to be good in this world cup. I would support him ahead of umesh looking at their current form.
rahulrulezz Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 He is hitting the seam these days and getting the movement off the pitch which was missing for the past few years. If you can remember' date=' he was bowling cross seam stuff at the beginning of 2014. But, these days he is getting good movement off the pitch because he is hitting the seam correctly. He is going to be good in this world cup. I would support him ahead of umesh looking at their current form.[/quote'] That's why he still averaged 47 after hitting the 'good seam' . dude trust me, the guy is just useless
vvvslaxman Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 These are BCCI's tactics to make last minute replacement.
Shivaji bhonsle Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 That's why he still averaged 47 after hitting the 'good seam' . dude trust me' date=' the guy is just useless[/quote'] Did you read what I posted? I'm saying he is doing much better in the past few months. I'm not talking about his whole career. He was crap, but these days he is our best bet.
nevada Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 He is the Rohit Sharma of bowling - "talented" and consistently mediocre.
rahulrulezz Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 Did you read what I posted? I'm saying he is doing much better in the past few months. I'm not talking about his whole career. He was crap' date=' but these days he is our best bet.[/quote'] Toh what do you think I am talking about.. I am talking about the recent India Australia test series where even after hitting the 'seam' he still averaged 47 in the series...
rahulrulezz Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 He is the Rohit Sharma of bowling - "talented" and consistently mediocre.
Shivaji bhonsle Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 Toh what do you think I am talking about.. I am talking about the recent India Australia test series where even after hitting the 'seam' he still averaged 47 in the series... did you watch the match? He was our best bowler I in terms of economy. If only we had a bowler to support him from the other end , we would have got the wickets
rahulrulezz Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 did you watch the match? He was our best bowler I in terms of economy. If only we had a bowler to support him from the other end ' date=' we would have got the wickets[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical:
Shivaji bhonsle Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 :hysterical::hysterical: I think you didn't watch the match Everyone else was going for runs in the 3rd test match and he looked the most economical and picking wickets. Although he was mocked by the Aussie commentators for getting the line and length right after two test matches, he looked the best of the lot.
moniker Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 did you watch the match? He was our best bowler I in terms of economy. If only we had a bowler to support him from the other end ' date=' we would have got the wickets[/quote'] He had to bowl 85 balls to get a wicket. An economy of 3.5 isn't good enough to compensate such an awful strike rate.
.svg.png.5ab3ce86b8af4a762132502c85a350db.thumb.png.8a4574a4556391f1df10aa68196a2ab0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now