Jump to content

Congrats Australia for winning the WC for the 5th Time !!!!!!!


CG

Recommended Posts

Posted
Anderson and Broad couldnt beat us at lords despite winning a lottery toss. Eng won the last 2 Ashes mainly on the back of Swann
This is a lie. Swann's average against Aus was pretty terrible. I recall him only having a couple of good tests the last 3 series. One on Adelaide and the other at Lord's. So two great tests out of 13 ( he didn't play the last two of last series) and for the rest he was mainly mediocre. The reason England won the two ashes before the last one was because they had better batsmen. No longer the case so Aus probably will win it. I say 2-1 aus.
Posted

Aus winning a major cup after 8 years. also they haven't won T20 world cup till date. this results shows other team's domination since 2007-2015.

Posted
Aus winning a major cup after 8 years. also they haven't won T20 world cup till date. this results shows other team's domination since 2007-2015.
Well they did win the ICC trophy in 2009. Also made the 2010 20/20 final. So it's not like they haven't threatened.
Posted
This is a lie. Swann's average against Aus was pretty terrible. I recall him only having a couple of good tests the last 3 series. One on Adelaide and the other at Lord's. So two great tests out of 13 ( he didn't play the last two of last series) and for the rest he was mainly mediocre. The reason England won the two ashes before the last one was because they had better batsmen. No longer the case so Aus probably will win it. I say 2-1 aus.
Tests won in the last 2 Ashes series in England http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;home_or_away=1;opposition=2;orderby=wickets;result=1;spanmin1=15+Mar+2007;spanval1=span;team=1;template=results;type=bowling Swann (and Broad) your best bowler by long distance. Obviously having better batsmen played a big role but Swann was the main difference
Posted
Just too good in these conditions. Remarkable depth - 3 in-form fast bowlers' date=' two fast bowling all-rounders, and one trundler spinner.[/quote'] Their batters & bowlers performed very well indeed; bowlers by far were the best in the tournament. Fielding was top notch. Besides this, their mental toughness and attitude makes them a very formidable opposition for other teams. They are truly one team who start any tournament as the favourites and on 8/9 occasions out of 10 end up winning the tournament. That's how a champion team should be.
Posted
Hahaha I see your little jinx thread has backfired on your ugly face :giggle:
:hysterical: Idiot.Only idiots like you believe in jinx.
Posted

I congragulate Australia who peaked in the semi-final and final and on that showing were head and shoulders above any team . They posessed temperament ,mental strength and killer instinct in a different league from any other team. Not playing a single game in Australia acted against the fortunes of New Zealand as the bounce and conditions of pitches in Australia were at variance with those of New Zealand.Man-to man South Africa was still to me the best team.In the end I would place Australai as the giants on top with India,South Africa and New Zealand at level vying for 2nd spot.On paper I consider both South Africa and india marginally better than New Zealand and would have backed them to beat the Kiwis in a final on Australasian soil in close finish.This is because of their familiarity with Australian playing conditions. The only teams who have won the world cup better than this Australian side are Clive Lloyd's West Indian team and Ricky Ponting's Australian side.This 2015 Aussie taem would have won against the 1983,1987,1992 and 1996 winners of the cup.It posessed professionalsim on par with the giant West Indian and Australian teams of the past.Their trumpcard was great batting depth and striking pace bowling power which could make lightning breakthroughs.

Posted
I congragulate Australia who peaked in the semi-final and final and on that showing were head and shoulders above any team . They posessed temperament ,mental strength and killer instinct in a different league from any other team. Not playing a single game in Australia acted against the fortunes of New Zealand as the bounce and conditions of pitches in Australia were at variance with those of New Zealand.Man-to man South Africa was still to me the best team.In the end I would place Australai as the giants on top with India,South Africa and New Zealand at level vying for 2nd spot.On paper I consider both South Africa and india marginally better than New Zealand and would have backed them to beat the Kiwis in a final on Australasian soil in close finish.This is because of their familiarity with Australian playing conditions. The only teams who have won the world cup better than this Australian side are Clive Lloyd's West Indian team and Ricky Ponting's Australian side.This 2015 Aussie taem would have won against the 1983,1987,1992 and 1996 winners of the cup.It posessed professionalsim on par with the giant West Indian and Australian teams of the past.Their trumpcard was great batting depth and striking pace bowling power which could make lightning breakthroughs.
You do not compare eras.Its hypothetical.Cricket was played quite differently and conditions quite diff.
Posted
I congragulate Australia who peaked in the semi-final and final and on that showing were head and shoulders above any team . They posessed temperament ,mental strength and killer instinct in a different league from any other team. Not playing a single game in Australia acted against the fortunes of New Zealand as the bounce and conditions of pitches in Australia were at variance with those of New Zealand.Man-to man South Africa was still to me the best team.In the end I would place Australai as the giants on top with India,South Africa and New Zealand at level vying for 2nd spot.On paper I consider both South Africa and india marginally better than New Zealand and would have backed them to beat the Kiwis in a final on Australasian soil in close finish.This is because of their familiarity with Australian playing conditions. The only teams who have won the world cup better than this Australian side are Clive Lloyd's West Indian team and Ricky Ponting's Australian side.This 2015 Aussie taem would have won against the 1983,1987,1992 and 1996 winners of the cup.It posessed professionalsim on par with the giant West Indian and Australian teams of the past.Their trumpcard was great batting depth and striking pace bowling power which could make lightning breakthroughs.
Do u really think this Aus team would have beaten the 96 Sr Lankan team on a sub continental wkt ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...