rkt.india Posted August 8, 2015 Posted August 8, 2015 Watched Drishyam, and in terms of overall quality, it is better than both Bajranji Bhaijaan and Bahubali .... Even the songs are nicely done in a way that blends with the story Bajranji has a watchable 2nd half, while Bahubali is a modern day Roop ki rani Choron ka Raja I.e. A film made by coping scenes from various films set in a relatively lavish background While you forgot that roop ki rani choro ka raja was a disaster.
Kalia_Test Posted August 8, 2015 Author Posted August 8, 2015 While people can "watch" Drishyam,etc - they need to "experience" Bahubali And then GOD said :- Let there be Bahubali :P
Precambrian Posted August 8, 2015 Posted August 8, 2015 Its incredible that all three movies running in theatres successfully are penned by southies.
Kalia_Test Posted August 8, 2015 Author Posted August 8, 2015 Its incredible that all three movies running in theatres successfully are penned by southies. True. And they are Indians first :two_thumbs_up:
Tiger80 Posted August 8, 2015 Posted August 8, 2015 Finally watched the film . Really like it. But one thing surprises me that even South Indians also show black = monster concept.dark skinned Kaal ke are shown as savages
zen Posted August 9, 2015 Posted August 9, 2015 While you forgot that roop ki rani choro ka raja was a disaster. So? I am comparing the quality of films. HNY is probably a bigger hit than Haider but that does that make it a better film For e.g. SgyYJEGrZ-Y In the video, the art direction is top notch. However, the song and the acting etc. is ok to bad which hinders the overall experience. Despite excellent art direction, there is no way I can watch and enjoy the song for 4 mins
Kalia_Test Posted August 10, 2015 Author Posted August 10, 2015 Bahubali moves past Dhoom3 and is now the 3rd highest grossing Indian movie EVER :yay: http://www.forbes.com/sites/robcain/2015/08/10/baahubali-zooms-past-dhoom-now-indias-all-time-3/ 545 crores so far
randomGuy Posted August 10, 2015 Posted August 10, 2015 A lot of hard work would have gone into the movie. so truly deserved. I would give an 8, maybe 8.5 out of 10 (and for comparison, a 10/10 to the movie 300). The ice scene was unnecessary and the movie was a slightly long. Every character was good. Baahubali and Avantika characters were the best for me.
Precambrian Posted August 11, 2015 Posted August 11, 2015 550 crores and running :hatsoff: They grossly underestimated the potential of hindi dub version and did not focus enough on marketing and distribution. A thing I expect them to correct in Bahubali - 2. And I expect the hindi version to gross upwards of 200 crores. Expecting part 2 to do at least 700 crores business.
maniac Posted August 11, 2015 Posted August 11, 2015 So? I am comparing the quality of films. HNY is probably a bigger hit than Haider but that does that make it a better film For e.g. SgyYJEGrZ-Y In the video, the art direction is top notch. However, the song and the acting etc. is ok to bad which hinders the overall experience. Despite excellent art direction, there is no way I can watch and enjoy the song for 4 mins Ok You didn't like the tune fair enough but what scope of acting did you see in that choreography :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:...I don't think if you put Robert Deniro and Meryl Streep in that setting,you would not have found performances matching your expectations :cantstop:
zen Posted August 11, 2015 Posted August 11, 2015 Ok You didn't like the tune fair enough but what scope of acting did you see in that choreography :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:...I don't think if you put Robert Deniro and Meryl Streep in that setting' date='you would not have found performances matching your expectations :cantstop:[/quote'] ^ :hysterical: In Indian films, the songs require to you act (or ham if you prefer) as well. So if it is a happy song sequence, you are supposed to act "happy" and not just dance like a robot Same goes for fight choreography, where if you are hurt, you have show pain :winky: Anyways, Bahubali is probably targeted towards audiences who can't understand such nuances :cantstop:
Kalia_Test Posted August 11, 2015 Author Posted August 11, 2015 Ok You didn't like the tune fair enough but what scope of acting did you see in that choreography :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:...I don't think if you put Robert Deniro and Meryl Streep in that setting' date='you would not have found performances matching your expectations :cantstop:[/quote'] You are illiterate fellow maniac. You don't know world cinema. All you know is eating Kaaja and Poothareku and garlanding Superstar Krishna's poster. As an example of how great acting elevates dance, take a look at the full sequence below and learn nuances of acting. HFY3RfzxPYM&spfreload=10
zen Posted August 11, 2015 Posted August 11, 2015 You are illiterate fellow maniac. You don't know world cinema. All you know is eating Kaaja and Poothareku and garlanding Superstar Krishna's poster. As an example of how great acting elevates dance, take a look at the full sequence below and learn nuances of acting. HFY3RfzxPYM&spfreload=10 Your sarcasm aside, that is an acceptable acting for a dance sequence at a "formal" event (and where probably a message is supposed to be passed on), esp. in Hollywood :winky:
Kalia_Test Posted August 11, 2015 Author Posted August 11, 2015 Your sarcasm aside' date=' that is an acceptable acting for a dance sequence at a "formal" event (and where probably a message is supposed to be passed on), esp. in Hollywood :winky:[/quote'] Maybe...but at 1:45, I din't know Hollywood standard is scratching one's head and passing it off as dance at a formal occasion:--D
zen Posted August 11, 2015 Posted August 11, 2015 Maybe...but at 1:45' date=' I din't know Hollywood standard is scratching one's head and passing it off as dance at a formal occasion:--D[/quote'] At 1.45, I saw a lady descending from stairs :dontknow:
Kalia_Test Posted August 11, 2015 Author Posted August 11, 2015 At 1.45' date=' I saw a lady descending from stairs :dontknow:[/quote'] Did you see "from" 1:45 as I meant or "At" 1:45. If you saw "at" 1:45, how did you know if she was ascending or descending?
zen Posted August 11, 2015 Posted August 11, 2015 Did you see "from" 1:45 as I meant or "At" 1:45. If you saw "at" 1:45, how did you know if she was ascending or descending? I meant "from" (let's not be too hyper technical) Have you seen Never Say Never Again?
Kalia_Test Posted August 11, 2015 Author Posted August 11, 2015 I meant "from" (let's not be too hyper technical) Have you seen Never Say Never Again? If you had seen "from" did you not see scratching head? Strange :nervous: NO. I have not seen Never Say Never Again. Do you "personally" recommend it?
Precambrian Posted August 11, 2015 Posted August 11, 2015 Did you see "from" 1:45 as I meant or "At" 1:45. If you saw "at" 1:45, how did you know if she was ascending or descending? :cantstop:
zen Posted August 11, 2015 Posted August 11, 2015 If you had seen "from" did you not see scratching head? Strange :nervous: NO. I have not seen Never Say Never Again. Do you "personally" recommend it? What scratching? :haha: .... She was removing something from her head and doing her hair .... And strange? - that character is supposed to act "strangely", so not surprised if that is how it appeared to you The film probably has not aged well so I would not recommend it unless you are a fan of 007 films. The "original" Thunderball is probably a better option .... Also note that the film was made by different producers so it is not a "regular" Bond film. When it was released it competed with Octopussy, if I am not wrong PS Since you think Bahubali is great, you can probably watch anything so there is no point in asking for recommendations
Recommended Posts