Brainfade Posted May 19, 2016 Posted May 19, 2016 (edited) Points table order should be based on W/L ratio, not simply points. Thus, teams that have played 13 matches to earn 14 points (RCB/MI) should be below teams that have played 12 matches to earn 14 points (KKR/GL before today). Giving all 14-point teams the same points status and then sorting by NRR is weird. That is all. Edited May 20, 2016 by Moth2Flame PBN and sourab10forever 1 1
bowl_out Posted May 19, 2016 Posted May 19, 2016 How does it matter... It is only a temporary thing.. Teams can do the math they want and rearrange their positions on their laptops. sourab10forever 1
flamy Posted May 20, 2016 Posted May 20, 2016 5 hours ago, bowl_out said: How does it matter... It is only a temporary thing.. Teams can do the math they want and rearrange their positions on their laptops. OP must be south african RedFever 1
randomGuy Posted May 20, 2016 Posted May 20, 2016 So the OP is saying that teams should be ranked by points per match (points divided by matches) , good suggestion one would say.
sourab10forever Posted May 20, 2016 Posted May 20, 2016 10 hours ago, bowl_out said: How does it matter... It is only a temporary thing.. Teams can do the math they want and rearrange their positions on their laptops. Exactly.
Brainfade Posted May 20, 2016 Author Posted May 20, 2016 It's like in the NBA, for example. If Team A has played 40 games to win 28, and Team B has played only 36 games to win 28, Team B is ranked above Team A regardless of points scored. W/L ratio just makes more sense. It's no biggie, just a peeve.
sourab10forever Posted May 25, 2016 Posted May 25, 2016 On 5/20/2016 at 1:20 AM, Moth2Flame said: It's like in the NBA, for example. If Team A has played 40 games to win 28, and Team B has played only 36 games to win 28, Team B is ranked above Team A regardless of points scored. W/L ratio just makes more sense. It's no biggie, just a peeve. The thing is there is no prize for being on top through the season. In the end,everybody will have the same no of matches so there's no point having a rule like that. But this should be applied to decide orange caps and purple ones. Esp purple cap. If two player have same number of wickets, then the one playing the lesser number of games should get it instead of checking economy and average. Watson and chahal are tied. Watson has played three more matches than chahal.
CoverDrive Posted May 25, 2016 Posted May 25, 2016 this is not NBA or MLB with huge seasons. people instinctively understand that you need to get to 14-16-18 points to qualify so points are more useful.
Recommended Posts