rkt.india Posted September 8, 2016 Posted September 8, 2016 This guys is a brilliant actor, not many can give such closeup shots singing a song they are not actually singing. tweaker 1
coffee_rules Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 This is exactly how the movie is..Spoilers in the link.. https://www.buzzfeed.com/sahilrizwan/the-story-literally-gave-her-cancer?utm_term=.ttmz2EKYe#.vj2lZDKV2
Texy Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 Bastard Kjo. There are so many Indian actors that could've benefitted from that role given to the Pak actor. tweaker 1
Sooda Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 Ok film, nothing unique about it. Well acted enough
coffee_rules Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 10 hours ago, Sooda said: Ok film, nothing unique about it. Well acted enough Who in particular? Anushka and Ranbir were being outrageously directed to ham it up in the first half. Second half is ok, but whole premise of the movie where the guy doesn't know that no means no..is written horribly by the director. tweaker 1
vayuu1 Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 Honestly, I found shivaay better than adhm. Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk
rkt.india Posted November 3, 2016 Author Posted November 3, 2016 3 hours ago, coffee_rules said: Who in particular? Anushka and Ranbir were being outrageously directed to ham it up in the first half. Second half is ok, but whole premise of the movie where the guy doesn't know that no means no..is written horribly by the director. If you understand the nature of love, no never means no for a lover. Love is not a thing when you can shift your love from one person to another person so easily. A lover will always try and hope for that person to says yes despite continuous no's. If he does not then it is not love.
coffee_rules Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 3 hours ago, rkt.india said: If you understand the nature of love, no never means no for a lover. Love is not a thing when you can shift your love from one person to another person so easily. A lover will always try and hope for that person to says yes despite continuous no's. If he does not then it is not love. But he was 'friend-zoned' despite many attempts. Nobody pursues married women for the sake of 'love', It becomes stalking and mind-numbingly dumb. Nobody sane will still keep loving and eternally waiting for the 'love' after she has chosen somebody else and gotten hitched as well.
Sooda Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 ^Yeah I agree it was OTT of Ranbirs character... in the end he accepeted FriendZoneship but by then it was too late I thought the first half where Ranbir and Anushkas friendship was developing was quite nice, the whole bit in Paris etc. It wasnt unnatural, like many films which go from frienship to love too rapidly
Recommended Posts