coffee_rules Posted January 16, 2017 Posted January 16, 2017 (edited) How quickly people forget. "member Sydney circa..Jan 2016 http://m.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/895815.html Edited January 16, 2017 by coffee_rules
BeautifulGame Posted January 16, 2017 Posted January 16, 2017 How quickly people forget. "member Sydney circa..Jan 2016 http://m.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/895815.html Yes thats why both should have played this series . The question should have been Yuvraj vs Pandey rather than Jadhav tweaker and Texan 2
Texan Posted January 16, 2017 Posted January 16, 2017 Question is not whether we should have Pandey or Kedar. We should have both of them. We have one passenger in the team in the form of Yuvraj, who should not be in the team. tweaker 1
express bowling Posted January 16, 2017 Posted January 16, 2017 Pandey would have played this series had he batted a bit more responsibly in the 5 match ODI series against NZ. He threw his wicket away 3 times out of 5 innings and never crossed 30 in the whole series. Bad form is acceptable but captains don't like batters who throw their wickets away. tweaker and sandeep 2
coffee_rules Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 (edited) AGreed, he is not in form, but we need to give a longer rope to players who have performed abroad , and not rely on oldies who show flashes of brilliance. Like Rahane for tests, nobody should drop him because he is v good abroad. Similar to Rohit in ODIs. Edited January 17, 2017 by coffee_rules
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now