Moochad Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Nahi yaar, main to bus trolling/time pass kar raha hoon, mujko yaad aata hain yeh jaahil ka bevakoophiyah, jaahil: "mere pass Computer Science degree hai, isliye mera opinion medical doctoroan se zyaada saahe hai, main itna hosiyaar hoon, main poora jahan ka sabse betterien analyst hoon" neutral logon ko dekh sakta hain, jaise aap logon kaite ho "doodh ka doodh, paani ka paani" chinta maat kar, itna serious nahi hai chinta ka vaat nahi hai, tum dono tattie-susu har thread main kar rahe ho, isliye maine bola tha, ek thread main tattie-susu kar lo, koi tum dono ko pareshaan nahi karega Green Monster and Garuda 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moochad Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 @Tibarn Bro, I was reading through the thread and it looks like some of the images you uploaded expired. Can you please reupload them? Tibarn 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tibarn Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 2 hours ago, Moochad said: @Tibarn Bro, I was reading through the thread and it looks like some of the images you uploaded expired. Can you please reupload them? Done Moochad and Green Monster 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moochad Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Tibarn said: Done So how did they arrive at those numbers for the breeding ratio? Edited May 5, 2018 by Moochad Green Monster 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tibarn Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, Moochad said: So how did they arrive at those numbers for the breeding ratio? This particular study used autosomal vs X chromosomal recombination rates to determine the breeding ratio. Moochad and Green Monster 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tibarn Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 @Moochad Actually, there is also another study I read which used NRY and mitochondrial DNA and came to a similar conclusion, I will post a table from it below The bases of the triangles represent the current effective population sizes and the tip the ancestral effective population size. Red is female and blue is male. Green Monster and Moochad 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moochad Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 4 minutes ago, Tibarn said: @Moochad Actually, there is also another study I read which used NRY and mitochondrial DNA and came to a similar conclusion, I will post a table from it below The bases of the triangles represent the current effective population sizes and the tip the ancestral effective population size. Red is female and blue is male. Interesting, so polygamy was the dominant practice since pre-migration out of Africa! Where does/how often does polyandry occur? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tibarn Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, Moochad said: Interesting, so polygamy was the dominant practice since pre-migration out of Africa! Where does/how often does polyandry occur? Where it occurs I'm not sure, but of the 1267 recorded cultures, only 4 have polyandry as a method of marital organization. If I remember correctly, these groups were basically tribal groups in places like North America. For comparisons sake, 186 have been monogamous and 1041 have been polygamous Moochad and Green Monster 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moochad Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, Tibarn said: Where it occurs I'm not sure, but of the 1267 recorded cultures, only 4 have polyandry as a method of marital organization. If I remember correctly, these groups were basically tribal groups in places like North America. For comparisons sake, 186 have been monogamous and 1041 have been polygamous I makes sense when you think about it, I guess, if the practice was is Africa pre-migration than you would expect it to continue. Green Monster and Tibarn 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tibarn Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, Moochad said: I makes sense when you think about it, I guess, if the practice was is Africa pre-migration than you would expect it to continue. Yes, if you re-read the post on page 3, you can see a citation on how this behavior is conserved across mammals. Polyandry is just a weird "mutant" behavior. Ultimately I would guess that it would die out fast even if it existed on any "large" scale. Green Monster and Moochad 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moochad Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 1 minute ago, Tibarn said: Yes, if you re-read the post on page 3, you can see a citation on how this behavior is conserved across mammals. Polyandry is just a weird "mutant" behavior. Ultimately I would guess that it would die out fast even if it existed on any "large" scale. Sorry I missed that! (Your post was Yuuuge!) Yeah, I guess the larger cultures would eventually absorb/assimilate the smaller ones with as you said, "mutant" behavior. Tibarn and Green Monster 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tibarn Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 6 minutes ago, Moochad said: Sorry I missed that! (Your post was Yuuuge!) That is a short post compared to some of my others. 6 minutes ago, Moochad said: Yeah, I guess the larger cultures would eventually absorb/assimilate the smaller ones with as you said, "mutant" behavior. Not really that, it's more to do with size. Think of it similar to a limiting reagent. Moochad and Green Monster 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moochad Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 4 minutes ago, Tibarn said: That is a short post compared to some of my others. Not really that, it's more to do with size. Think of it similar to a limiting reagent. I see what you're saying, It would limit the size of a population, correct? Tibarn 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tibarn Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 1 minute ago, Moochad said: I see what you're saying, It would limit the size of a population, correct? Exactly! Imagine a species of primate with a gestation period of 1 year and 3 different societies of that primate. A is polygamous, B is monogamous, C polyandrous; A has 1 male marry 10 females, B has 10 males 10 females marry, and C has 10 males and 1 female marry. A and B could both produce 10 children in 1 year, but C could only produce 1 child in 1 year. Its pretty obvious that C would be more vulnerable to acts of nature like disease or natural disaster, and thus C would have a greater chance of extinction. A and B could both lose 80 percent of their population and still be okay. If anything untoward happens, C would completely disappear. Green Monster and Moochad 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moochad Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Tibarn said: Exactly! Imagine a species of primate with a gestation period of 1 year and 3 different societies of that primate. A is polygamous, B is monogamous, C polyandrous; A has 1 male marry 10 females, B has 10 males 10 females marry, and C has 10 males and 1 female marry. A and B could both produce 10 children in 1 year, but C could only produce 1 child in 1 year. Its pretty obvious that C would be more vulnerable to acts of nature like disease or natural disaster, and thus C would have a greater chance of extinction. A and B could both lose 80 percent of their population and still be okay. If anything untoward happens, C would completely disappear. Interesting, Actually, I think it is even worse than in your example. If population C has only 1 offspring from 10M:1F, that is as good as extinct, as to further carry on the next generation, they would need at least 2 offspring, 1M and 1F, so really they would need 20M : 2F, just for a chance at survival. Group A and B can both do it with less total population, 11 and 20, compared to 22 for C. They also get much greater return on investment! Edited May 5, 2018 by Moochad Tibarn and Green Monster 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted May 8, 2018 Share Posted May 8, 2018 Come on guys we are all liberal in some way. We have evolved over the years culturally. Let us not use the word liberal to make a political identification. The same mistake is being committed by conservatives in the US. There is nothing wrong with being liberal. It is a sign of progression. Don't associate people like Sagarika Ghose with liberalism and insults it. sarcastic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tibarn Posted May 8, 2018 Share Posted May 8, 2018 12 hours ago, Green Monster said: @Tibarn Little Tibby I think our friend VVSLaxman is talking about youu It doesn't matter, the thread itself devolved into trolling on the first page itself, so no one should worry about this thread anyway. The only useful information is in my post on page 3, otherwise the thread is only back and forth tu-tu-me-me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surajmal Posted May 13, 2018 Author Share Posted May 13, 2018 New gem from Saggy https://twitter.com/sagarikaghose/status/993530030696292352 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 Gehlot Scientist - "Agar paani se bijli nikal jayegi, kehton mein kya khaak kaam aayega?" Plagiarized from Shool the movie!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dial_100 Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 37 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: Gehlot Scientist - "Agar paani se bijli nikal jayegi, kehton mein kya khaak kaam aayega?" Plagiarized from Shool the movie!!! That thing looks fabricated. I mean how could he say that. It doesnt look real. On wait ... If Sagu favors them then who knows he might be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts