Can we trust Pandya+Jadhav with 10 overs?

[tweaker]

Good bowling by Pandya today, completedhis 10 overs

[sandeep]

4 minutes ago, bleaf27 said:

Factual basis is open to interpretations mate ,  just number reading of cric info isn't a way I make my opinion , if that does float your boat , fair enough.

7 ODI experience of a certain player isn't enough for me to have man crushes on here ,  I'v set my threshold a bit higher than that.

 

phuck off "mate".  #IgnoreList.  

 

[bleaf27]

4 minutes ago, sandeep said:

phuck off "mate".  #IgnoreList.  

 

O0o  fighting words lad , hope the love isn't lost.  #heartbroken

[TNAmarkFrmIndia]

Should've actually trusted Jadhav more here.

[Cricketics]

Jadhav bowled well in one game doesn't meant he will bowl well everytime. He bowls too full at times and will get whacked a lot of times. He bowled bad today and could have given more runs ahd Shoaib Malik not played few bad shots to him.

[TNAmarkFrmIndia]

5 minutes ago, Cricketics said:

He bowled bad today and could have given more runs ahd Shoaib Malik not played few bad shots to him.

Similarly, he could have given less runs had Hafeez and Imad Wasim not played a few good shots to him. 

 

44th over is not the time to bring in a spinner. They should've brought him in a lot earlier.

[Cricketics]

3 minutes ago, TNAmarkFrmIndia said:

Similarly, he could have given less runs had Hafeez and Imad Wasim not played a few good shots to him. 

 

44th over is not the time to bring in a spinner. They should've brought him in a lot earlier.

He came earlier than 44th. I think 39th.

 

Though him bowling in 44th is not a bad move since Bumrah has been spraying runs today so it was fine to try hi' for Bumrah at 44th.

 

Though i agree that he could have been tried earlier, but don't think he would have been very effective.

 

 

[Sidhoni]

Well bowled Pandya and Jadhav. Its a different thing that we still missed Shami.

[TNAmarkFrmIndia]

30 minutes ago, Cricketics said:

He came earlier than 44th. I think 39th.

He came in earlier but he shouldn't have bowled that 44th over. Not saying this in hindsight. You could just sense that he was going to get smashed.

[Cricketics]

1 minute ago, TNAmarkFrmIndia said:

He came in earlier but he shouldn't have bowled that 44th over. Not saying this in hindsight. You could just sense that he was going to get smashed.

Bumrah got smashed too ao it was fine that time. We hust sucked man,sucked so mich that Pandy was used earlier than death because had he not been used we would have been in further trouble in the middle.

 

Well bowled Pandya and Bhuvi who saved us from giving away 360ish total to pakistan.

[Vijy]

don't think we can do so since one of the main 4 will also have an off-day.