Pressure created by Kuldeep helped me get wickets - Krunal Pandya

[Khota]

2 minutes ago, sandeep said:

And if wishes were horses, beggars would ride in style.  

So you are trying to say there is no spinner better than Pandya out there?

[Ankit_sharma03]

6 minutes ago, Khota said:

And if you have a specialist bowler they would have probably scored less. There are plenty of choices besides pandya.

thats no guarantee , i hve already shown u stats when Hardik have done well then our main bowler and krunal showed that 

 

[Khota]

11 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

thats no guarantee , i hve already shown u stats when Hardik have done well then our main bowler and krunal showed that 

 

I just showed you he bled the most number of runs.

[Ankit_sharma03]

6 minutes ago, Khota said:

I just showed you he bled the most number of runs.

• but its a specialist bowler yuzi chahal who has the record of giving most runs by an indian in a t20 not krunal pandya ...so ur wrong  
• Umesh yadav a specialist bowler eco is worse then hardik pandya in odi .......so ur wrong their
• Infact shami n hardik eco is same in odi ........so ur wrong my frend

 

Here is a big shock, most runs conceded by a bowler in ODI from India and hardik doesnt even feature in the list and its a bloody long list filled with specialist bowlers 

 

So try harder next time to prove ur point 

Edited November 26, 2018 by Ankit_sharma03

[Moochad]

An example of why bowling partnerships are so important. 

 

We can't have a weak link in the side who will give up runs. It would allow the opposition to play out the main strike bowlers

[sandeep]

46 minutes ago, Khota said:

So you are trying to say there is no spinner better than Pandya out there?

There's no player we have available for selection that offers the value that Pandya sr offers with ball and bat.  That's why he's in the team.  No amount of wishing for specialist bowlers like Joel Garner, or magical allrounders like Sobers is going to make such a player spontaneously exist as if invoked by some yagna.  

[Ankit_sharma03]

30 minutes ago, sandeep said:

 magical allrounders like Sobers is going to make such a player spontaneously exist as if invoked by some yagna.  

No no sobers never existed  

Acc to the legend - all rounders dont exist and never did 

[Khota]

7 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

• but its a specialist bowler yuzi chahal who has the record of giving most runs by an indian in a t20 not krunal pandya ...so ur wrong  
• Umesh yadav a specialist bowler eco is worse then hardik pandya in odi .......so ur wrong their
• Infact shami n hardik eco is same in odi ........so ur wrong my frend

 

Here is a big shock, most runs conceded by a bowler in ODI from India and hardik doesnt even feature in the list and its a bloody long list filled with specialist bowlers 

 

So try harder next time to prove ur point 

I dont have to try hard. He gave the most runs in the last three games.

[Khota]

6 hours ago, sandeep said:

There's no player we have available for selection that offers the value that Pandya sr offers with ball and bat.  That's why he's in the team.  No amount of wishing for specialist bowlers like Joel Garner, or magical allrounders like Sobers is going to make such a player spontaneously exist as if invoked by some yagna.  

That is in the eye of beholder. A specialist batsman or a bowler offer real good value.

[Ankit_sharma03]

3 hours ago, Khota said:

I dont have to try hard. He gave the most runs in the last three games.

Wrong , he didnt check ur stats

 

in 2nd t20 

krunal 26 runs

khaleel - 39 runs (speaclist bowler)

 

39 is more then 26

 

in 3 t20

krunal- 36 runs + he was man of the match 

bumrah - 38 (specialist bowler)

 

38 is more then 36

 

 

See thats how stubborn ur , now ur lying to prove ur point .....

Try hard, atleast check the stats

 

Edited November 27, 2018 by Ankit_sharma03

[Global.Baba]

10 hours ago, sandeep said:

<maniacSpeakTranslation>  Hardik has the x-factor, while Krunal seems to lack it.  Or at least I will say this until Krunal has a few good performances, and then I will start posting threads like - "Krunal is a breath of fresh air" etc etc. </Translation>

 

Am I getting this right?

Have always been consistent in my view that both Pandya brothers are alright for T20 and Hardik for ODIs . It is calling them “allrounders” and hailing them as the most critical discovery since fire is what I have a problem with. What inconsistencies are you seeing?

 

The Pandya brothers are journeymen bits and pieces cricketers at best which are dime a dozen in these days of T20 leagues across the world and we just happened to find a couple of our own.

 

[Khota]

7 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Wrong , he didnt check ur stats

 

in 2nd t20 

krunal 26 runs

khaleel - 39 runs (speaclist bowler)

 

39 is more then 26

 

in 3 t20

krunal- 36 runs + he was man of the match 

bumrah - 38 (specialist bowler)

 

38 is more then 36

 

 

See thats how stubborn ur , now ur lying to prove ur point .....

Try hard, atleast check the stats

 

I have been very polite and you are equally annoying.

 

Three T20' and runs yielded:

Kumar  68

Khaleel  95

Bumrah  100

yadav   66

Pandya the great 117

 

Look at the pattern and see who is the worst offender.

 

Then use your stubborn brain and compare him to other spinner yadav who only gave half the runs. He should only be compared to spinners and if there was a proper spinner India would have won the series.

 

Anyone who defends Stuart Binny has no credibiity. None whatsoever.

 

Edited November 27, 2018 by Khota

[Ankit_sharma03]

8 minutes ago, Khota said:

I have been very polite and you are equally annoying.

 

Three T20' and runs yielded:

Kumar  68

Khaleel  95

Bumrah  100

yadav   66

Pandya the great 117

 

Look at the pattern and see who is the worst offender.

Thats becoz he had one off game nyways 

ab men bhi kaan ko dusri taraf se pakda hu

 

Bowlers job is to take wkts 

in t20 series 

Krunal - 5wkts

kuldeep - 4

bhuvi- 2

bumrah - 2

khaleel- 3

 

ab bol who is the best bowler of the series for India , u wanted to use that one bad game to show he was worse....i used one good game to show he was best 

 

 

Quote

 

Then use your stubborn brain and compare him to other spinner yadav who only gave half the runs. He should only be compared to spinners and if there was a proper spinner India would have won the series.

Then how come kuldeep took less wkts then him 

also he is an all rounder only a fool like u wud compare him to specialist 

Quote

Anyone who defends Stuart Binny has no credibiity. None whatsoever.

 

kyun ye bhedbhav kyun

if he saved a test match why shudnt i give him credit just becoz he has less talent , zyada talent wale rohit ne to aaj tak overseas wo bhi nhin kiya

Edited November 27, 2018 by Ankit_sharma03

[Khota]

7 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Thats becoz he had one off game nyways 

ab men bhi kaan ko dusri taraf se pakda hu

 

Bowlers job is to take wkts 

in t20 series 

Krunal - 5wkts

kuldeep - 4

bhuvi- 2

bumrah - 2

khaleel- 3

 

ab bol who is the best bowler of the series for India , u wanted to use that one bad game to show he was worse....i used one good game to show he was best 

 

 

Then how come kuldeep took less wkts then him 

also he is an all rounder only a fool like u wud compare him to specialist 

kyun ye bhedbhav kyun

if he saved a test match why shudnt i give him credit just becoz he has less talent , zyada talent wale rohit ne to aaj tak overseas wo bhi nhin kiya

Compare him to spinner and he is a run machine for opposition. 

Any proper spinner and this series would be 2-0.

Stuart Binny. Enough said.

 

[Ankit_sharma03]

8 minutes ago, Khota said:

Compare him to spinner and he is a run machine for opposition. 

He took wkts more then anyone, 

 

Quote

Any proper spinner and this series would be 2-0.

Let me bust ur myth

Last time yuzi went overseas

 

SA- 2 games 103 runs and 1 wkts 

Eng 3 games 92 runs and 1 wkts

 

Keep that bullshit myth to ur self , chahal was expensive and bad in wkts column to 

Quote

Stuart Binny. Enough said.

 

he performed when needed, enough said

Jokers like u cnt appreciate someone perfomance......kyunki bada naam nhin

 

By ur own admission ull say i dnt watch test match ...fir faltu ka gyaan bhi mat do na . Bina dekhe kisi pe kyun bolna

Edited November 27, 2018 by Ankit_sharma03

[sandeep]

9 hours ago, Global.Baba said:

Have always been consistent in my view that both Pandya brothers are alright for T20 and Hardik for ODIs .

Not true.  I remember pointing out the fact that Hardik is a better white ball bowler than Ben Stokes a couple of years ago, and you had a complete cow over it.  Of course, your revisionist memory must have airbrushed out this, just like the soviets used to 'delete' assassinated former leaders from museum photographs.  

[Global.Baba]

1 hour ago, sandeep said:

Not true.  I remember pointing out the fact that Hardik is a better white ball bowler than Ben Stokes a couple of years ago, and you had a complete cow over it.  Of course, your revisionist memory must have airbrushed out this, just like the soviets used to 'delete' assassinated former leaders from museum photographs.  

Ah I see, ok I have resisted saying this but I think your love for Pandya brothers stems from the love of Dhokla and Khakra. Atleast Guys like unknown genius, Zen and Cricketics are transparent about it .

 

Ben Stokes has a greater body of work in internationals than the Pandya bros can ever dream of.Hardik Pandya having a better thigh muscle than xyz is just and fkin irrelevant moot point.

 

 

Edited November 27, 2018 by Global.Baba

[Ankit_sharma03]

5 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:

 

Ben Stokes has a greater body of work in internationals than the Pandya bros can ever dream of.Hardik Pandya having a better thigh muscle than xyz is just and fkin irrelevant moot point.

 

 

U never knw 

 

Now stokes has played 49 test

his batting avg 33.7

bowling - 32

 

pandya has jst played 11 test and if u compare at that point nothing much to separate 

Pandya 

batting - 31

bowling 31

 

Where stokes stood after 11 test

Batting - 34

bowling - 41

 

So stokes was ahead in batting, hardik in bowling

 

Stokes surely is a more sound batsman and bowling england shud help his bowling avg still its not such a number that cannot be beaten , u never knw where pandya might stand after 49 test 

 

cricketers evolve differently , so u never knw 

 

ODI- 73 odis

batting - 36

bowling 40

 

Hardik has played 42 odi

batting 29

bowling - 40

 

where stokes was after 42 odi

batting - 22

bowling - 37 

 

So in odi , hardik batting avg , s/r both are better at the point i take and hardik bats at 7 and stokes 5 ...bowling not much diff

 

So hardik in both format hardik has one dept ahead, and lets not forget was raw cricketer fast tracked. Improvement is pretty good and so will it be in future

As i said u never knw what will happen in future 

[Global.Baba]

1 minute ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

U never knw 

 

Now stokes has played 49 test

his batting avg 33.7

bowling - 32

 

pandya has jst played 11 test and if u compare at that point nothing much to separate 

Pandya 

batting - 31

bowling 31

 

Where stokes stood after 11 test

Batting - 34

bowling - 41

 

So stokes was ahead in batting, hardik in bowling

 

Stokes surely is a more sound batsman and bowling england shud help his bowling avg still its not such a number that cannot be beaten , u never knw where pandya might stand after 49 test 

 

cricketers evolve differently , so u never knw 

 

ODI- 73 odis

batting - 36

bowling 40

 

Hardik has played 42 odi

batting 29

bowling - 40

 

where stokes was after 42 odi

batting - 22

bowling - 37 

 

So in odi , hardik batting avg , s/r both are better at the point i take and hardik bats at 7 and stokes 5 ...bowling not much diff

 

So hardik in both format hardik has one dept ahead, and lets not forget was raw cricketer fast tracked. Improvement is pretty good and so will it be in future

As i said u never knw what will happen in future 

That’s the same kind of argument that Pakistanis use for Younis khan and inzamam to show they are better than Dravid and Sachin.

 

No one in their right mind will pick Hardik over Stokes.

[Ankit_sharma03]

4 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:

That’s the same kind of argument that Pakistanis use for Younis khan and inzamam to show they are better than Dravid and Sachin.

 

No one in their right mind will pick Hardik over Stokes.

n rightly so why wud anyone pick a 11 test player with a far evolved 50 test player

but do u guarntee that the former wnt improve that ur making a claim that he cnt dream of reaching at stokes level....when stokes numbers arent that unachievable