Trichromatic Posted January 3, 2019 Posted January 3, 2019 8 minutes ago, zen said: that is your yardstick so you could follow that What else is yardstick to determine if "we" are missing him?
TNAmarkFromIndia Posted January 3, 2019 Posted January 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, zen said: But others selected avg lower than him. That doesn't make Pandya's achievements good. That only means the batsmen aren't performing. Hopefully we try more batsmen in Tests like they did Mayank Agarwal and find a top 6 that are all reliable bats, home or away. We can afford a Pandya if we had a keeper averaging over 40. Then the keeper would be in the top 6 and we could have an all-rounder at 7.
zen Posted January 3, 2019 Author Posted January 3, 2019 Just now, Trichromatic said: What else is yardstick to determine if "we" are missing him? what you feel for e.g. based on evidence in the game
Trichromatic Posted January 3, 2019 Posted January 3, 2019 1 minute ago, zen said: what you feel for e.g. based on evidence in the game Evidence of game suggests that no one else is missing him. Real McCoy 1
CSK Fan Posted January 3, 2019 Posted January 3, 2019 Op has an obsession with pandya. Bhuvi would have made more sense if he was fit. Why don't you watch that star package commercial a few more times? Real McCoy and Trichromatic 2
Trichromatic Posted January 3, 2019 Posted January 3, 2019 Talking about evidence of game, we saw KL Rahul failing. Didn't see anyone in world, be it a fan or expert mentioning wish we had Pandya opening for us.
zen Posted January 3, 2019 Author Posted January 3, 2019 Just now, Trichromatic said: Evidence of game suggests, no one else is missing him. Harsha just mentioned Pandya in extra innings
test fan Posted January 3, 2019 Posted January 3, 2019 We should play him as opener at SGC bcz I don't have any trust on Rahul nowadays &that's give another bowling options .in batting ifhegot some runs that bonus .but other than that position he don't have any chance right now .
zen Posted January 3, 2019 Author Posted January 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Trichromatic said: Talking about evidence of game, we saw KL Rahul failing. Didn't see anyone in world, be it a fan or expert mentioning wish we had Pandya opening for us. Was Pandya supposed to open?
Trichromatic Posted January 3, 2019 Posted January 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, zen said: Harsha just mentioned Pandya in extra innings What did he say?
Trichromatic Posted January 3, 2019 Posted January 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, zen said: Was Pandya supposed to open? What evidence did you find in 1 session and why did you mention KL's name in this thread?
zen Posted January 3, 2019 Author Posted January 3, 2019 Just now, Trichromatic said: Ask same question to yourself and then see why did you mention Rahul's name in this thread. I thought it is understood that Pandya could have played as the AR with one of Vihari/Rahane/.... opening .... though would have not minded Pandya opening
Khota Posted January 3, 2019 Posted January 3, 2019 I am missing Pandya op. Does that make you happy? Get over it. Real McCoy 1
zen Posted January 3, 2019 Author Posted January 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Trichromatic said: What did he say? India could have considered players such as Pandya .... and that despite the squad being of 18-19 members, only a selected few are shortlisted
Trichromatic Posted January 3, 2019 Posted January 3, 2019 Just now, zen said: I thought it is understood that Pandya could have played as the AR with one of Vihari/Rahane/.... opening .... though would have not minded Pandya opening Is there anyone else who is rooting for Pandya in place of Rahane or Vihari?
zen Posted January 3, 2019 Author Posted January 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, Trichromatic said: What evidence did you find in 1 session? As posted in OP "When you have an attack that includes 2 spinners among the 4 specialist bowling slots, it is wise to play an AR like Pandya, who can serve as the 5th bowler (3rd seamer) to support Bumrah + Shami and also bat at #6-7 .... The likes of KL, Rahane and Vihari appear to have a timer countdown attached to them as soon as they arrive at the crease. Ind is already 10/1 w/ KL gone struggling .... Are we missing Pandya already?"
zen Posted January 3, 2019 Author Posted January 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Trichromatic said: Is there anyone else who is rooting for Pandya in place of Rahane or Vihari? how is that relevant? It is about playing 3+2 combination
Trichromatic Posted January 3, 2019 Posted January 3, 2019 1 minute ago, zen said: As posted in OP "When you have an attack that includes 2 spinners among the 4 specialist bowling slots, it is wise to play an AR like Pandya, who can serve as the 5th bowler (3rd seamer) to support Bumrah + Shami and also bat at #6-7 .... The likes of KL, Rahane and Vihari appear to have a timer countdown attached to them as soon as they arrive at the crease. Ind is already 10/1 w/ KL gone struggling .... Are we missing Pandya already?" This can be said even before the game. What specific evidence did we find during the match?
Trichromatic Posted January 3, 2019 Posted January 3, 2019 Just now, zen said: how is that relevant? It is about playing 3+2 combination It's relevant because of thread title. There is no fix rule about 3+2 combination. Clarke 1
zen Posted January 3, 2019 Author Posted January 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, Trichromatic said: This can be said even before the game. What specific evidence did we find during the match? That Ind has continued with players who are struggling .... Did KL look good?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now