Jump to content

Is Hardik Pandya more talented than Jadeja in tests?


Is Pandya more talented than Jadeja in test matches?  

22 members have voted

  1. 1. Is Pandya more talented than Jadeja in test matches?



Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, Straight Drive said:

I have been following since very late 1960's and I can't name one. Better luck to others to name.

 

Why does Pandya needs to average 40 percent higher. His test average is 35 which is fine for all rounder imo.

 

 

He averages less than 30 in non-international game. In other threads, people claimed that if he is backed even without playing FC gamaes he can avg 36-40 in test cricket which is 20-30% higher than his FC avg.

 

If he remains at 28-32 level, then he isn't suited for no 6 position for sure in long term.

Posted
1 minute ago, Trichromatic said:

And I am still waiting for the list and examples of batsmen.

Irrelevant criteria 

 

And as mentioned above, Pandya averages 71 in India. And 60 in SL, where conditions are similar .... No need to mention the quality of attack vs Ranji teams 

Posted
1 minute ago, zen said:

Pandya avgs 71 in tests in Ind 

Records type batting analysis [change type]
View career summary [change view]
Host country India remove India from query
Ordered by default (ascending)
dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Career averages
  Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
unfiltered 11 18 1 532 108 31.29 720 73.88 1 4 2 68 12 Profile
filtered 1 1 0 71 71 71.00 94 75.53 0 1 0 10 0

 

 

SL, where conditions are similar, he averages 60

Records type batting analysis [change type]
View career summary [change view]
Host country Sri Lanka remove Sri Lanka from query
Ordered by default (ascending)
dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Career averages
  Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
unfiltered 11 18 1 532 108 31.29 720 73.88 1 4 2 68 12 Profile
filtered 3 3 0 178 108 59.33 165 107.87 1 1 0 16 10

 

Please do present a list of some(not all) batsmen who average 20-30% higher in inernational.

Posted
Just now, zen said:

Irrelevant criteria 

 

And as mentioned above, Pandya averages 71 in India. And 60 in SL, where conditions are similar .... No need to mention the quality of attack vs Ranji teams 

But yeah, there will some example for sure. Who are these batsmen? Or Pandya is exceptional talent?

Posted

In 4 tests in subcon, he averages 62 at a SR of 96 :drool:

 

Records type batting analysis [change type]
View career summary [change view]
Host country India remove India from query or Sri Lanka remove Sri Lanka from query
Ordered by default (ascending)
dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Career averages
  Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
unfiltered 11 18 1 532 108 31.29 720 73.88 1 4 2 68 12 Profile
filtered 4 4 0 249 108 62.25 259 96.13 1 2 0 26 10

 

 

Interestingly, he has scored 3 50+ scores in 4 innings he has played :hatsoff:

Posted
2 minutes ago, zen said:

Irrelevant criteria 

 

And as mentioned above, Pandya averages 71 in India. And 60 in SL, where conditions are similar .... No need to mention the quality of attack vs Ranji teams 

Long term he can't avg more than 32-33 if he doesn't play FC cricket. There is no historical evidence to say otherwise.

Posted
1 minute ago, Trichromatic said:

But yeah, there will some example for sure. Who are these batsmen? Or Pandya is exceptional talent?

Buddy, you are barking at the wrong tree as everyone knows:

 

  • Sample size of Pandya's domestic is small 
  • He has been fast tracked to international cricket based on potential 
  • That he averages 62 in subcon conditions vs international teams. Scoring a 50 or more runs in an inning 75% of the time
  • His SR is 96, which bring another dimension to the game esp. in subcon where you may want to score runs relatively quickly 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, zen said:

Buddy, you are barking at the wrong tree as everyone knows:

 

  • Sample size of Pandya's domestic is small 
  • He has been fast tracked to international cricket based on potential 
  •  That he averages 62 in subcon conditions vs international teams. Scoring a 50 or more runs in an inning 75% of the time
  •  His SR is 96, which bring another dimension to the game esp. in subcon where you may want to score runs relatively quickly 

  

  

You're just looking for a non-existent shortcut for success.

 

Still can't find examples though.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

Long term he can't avg more than 32-33 if he doesn't play FC cricket. There is no historical evidence to say otherwise.

Who cares about historical evidence? 

 

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

That's what I am saying. He can develop his game in FC, but without that he can't avg more than 31-32 in test cricket. No amount of training can replace hard work in matches though.

 

I would love it if Pandya gets to play more Ranji Trophy and other domestic FC matches.

 

But that seems unlikely as he will be part of our LOI squads.  (  Look what happened to Khaleel  ).

 

Test cricket against weaker teams like Zim, WI, Afghanistan and SL will give him some FC practice too.

 

Should be allowed to play A-team unofficial test matches if we want to develop him as a test player.

 

The planning has to be there.

 

 

Edited by express bowling
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

You're just looking for a non-existent shortcut for success.

 

Still can't find examples though.

As I have said, domestic averages are to spot the talent to represent Ind. If the potential can be determined through other means, that is acceptable as well

 

I have no idea what Sehwag and Dhoni's stats were in domestics when they made debut. But watching them play, I knew these were the players who can be backed. Similarly for Pandya 

Edited by zen
Posted
8 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

He averages less than 30 in non-international game. In other threads, people claimed that if he is backed even without playing FC gamaes he can avg 36-40 in test cricket which is 20-30% higher than his FC avg.

 

If he remains at 28-32 level, then he isn't suited for no 6 position for sure in long term.

Just checked his test batting average is  29.13 to be precise. I wouldnot mind even if he has batting average of 30. I would not really look or stress that  he needs to average even 10 percent higher, but if he does its gladly accepted a 20 percent is impossible imo but then no need for all rounder to average 36 . There is a workaround. He can improve his bowling.

 

If he becomes better bowler then that batting average of 30 is a non-issue to me.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Straight Drive said:

Just checked his test batting average is  29.13 to be precise. I wouldnot mind even if he has batting average of 30. I would not really look or stress that  he needs to average even 10 percent higher, but if he does its gladly accepted a 20 percent is impossible imo but then no need for all rounder to average 36 . There is a workaround. He can improve his bowling.

 

If he becomes better bowler then that batting average of 30 is a non-issue to me.

Pandya's batting avg is 31 

 

 

Posted (edited)

@Trichromatic

 

below are Sehwag's stats

 

Batting and fielding averages
  Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St
Tests 104 180 6 8586 319 49.34 10441 82.23 23 32 1233 91 91 0
ODIs 251 245 9 8273 219 35.05 7929 104.33 15 38 1132 136 93 0
T20Is 19 18 0 394 68 21.88 271 145.38 0 2 43 16 2 0
First-class 194 321 11 14683 319 47.36     42 55     166 0
List A 332 321 14 10454 219 34.05     16 57     120 0
T20s 159 157 6 4061 122 26.89 2747 147.83 2 24 487 147 42 0

 

  • his FC avg is 47, which is less than his test avg of 49. FC includes numbers from tests, so domestic only numbers would be even less (can be calculated by subtracting test numbers from FC) :winky:

 

Similarly for Dhoni:

 

Batting and fielding averages
  Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St
Tests 90 144 16 4876 224 38.09 8249 59.11 6 33 544 78 256 38
ODIs 337 285 81 10414 183* 51.04 11871 87.72 10 70 798 222 311 119
T20Is 93 80 40 1487 56 37.17 1170 127.09 0 2 107 47 54 33
First-class 131 210 19 7038 224 36.84     9 47     364 57
List A 410 352 96 12994 183* 50.75     17 84     392 137
T20s 297 266 108 6075 79* 38.44 4461 136.18 0 24 420 267 156 77

 

 

And I said that I believed in backing these two without knowing their domestic stats when they started based on how they played (and when there were relatively technically sound players around). Similarly, the case for Pandya 

 

Thank you! 

Edited by zen
Posted
44 minutes ago, Straight Drive said:

It is impossible to name any batsman who average 40 percent in test cricket than they do in FC. Even 20 percent is impossible.

Some notable exceptions being:

 

Ken Barrington who averaged 58+ in Tests but "only" 45+ in FC overall (28% higher in Tests).

Tony Greig who averaged 40+ in Tests but 31 in FC overall (29% higher in Tests).

 

 

Posted

The last I had checked few series back, his test bat average was around 35. So I had posted that 35 in one of my post. Seems it has dropped by 4 runs. However, I also see his bowling strike rate has improved significantly too. I am sure it was 88 few series abck and I see it 55 55.12. So it's not that his performance in both skills is on decline. The lesser runs are covered by improved bowling. 

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Straight Drive said:

The last I had checked few series back, his test bat average was around 35. So I had posted that 35 in one of my post. Seems it has dropped by 4 runs. However, I also see his bowling strike rate has improved significantly too. I am sure it was 88 few series abck and I see it 55 55.12. So it's not that his performance in both skills is on decline. The lesser runs are covered by improved bowling. 

Pandya avgs 60+ with the bat in subcon .... When bowling, he does well when he gets a relatively hard ball. Many times he is only bowling to give rest to the bowlers when the new ball is around the corner 

Edited by zen
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

Some notable exceptions being:

 

Ken Barrington who averaged 58+ in Tests but "only" 45+ in FC overall (28% higher in Tests).

Tony Greig who averaged 40+ in Tests but 31 in FC overall (29% higher in Tests).

 

 

You have found two pins from mountains of  hay stack. Well done.

 

How many test caps have been given in history of test cricket. Any way to find that ? Okay if this is skipped though.

 

Edited by Straight Drive
Posted

Pandya has played 7 of his 11 test matches in SA and England ... which are currently 2 of the toughest places to bat nowadays.

 

None of our other batsmen could average even 30 on these 2 tough away tours barring Kohli ( who averaged 54.5  )

 

Stands to reason that his overall batting average of 31+  will improve significantly if he gets to play tests in different conditions including Asia and Australia  (  he averages 62 in the 4 tests he has played in Asia  ) ...  and he gathers more experience as a test batsman.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...