vvvslaxman Posted October 16, 2019 Posted October 16, 2019 Seeing the utility value of Rana in the VH trophy , is there a case for him in the T20 side. He can play big shots. He can bowl similarly. A gun fielder too. He is more a specialist bat than Krunal. https://i.imgur.com/KWvxBwG.png
Ankit_sharma03 Posted October 16, 2019 Posted October 16, 2019 Nitish rana is a better batsman Krunal is a better bowler Both are bad against short pitch bowling and the t20 WC is in Aus Nitish will have to compete with other batsman, his bowling is more of part time Krunal at this point owns a place in t20 side, he has a MOM every overseas series till now . At this point there shudnt be even a question on his place in t20 side sandeep 1
Sooda Posted October 17, 2019 Posted October 17, 2019 Its good Krunal is aT20 regular now and For me Nitish, Surya Kumar Yadav, Shreyas Gopal - guys who have been consistently good in the IPL should have been in the T20I XI for a while, to see how they fare...certainly over the last two series vs WI especially and SA we should have rested some regulars and tried these guys out
bowl_out Posted October 17, 2019 Posted October 17, 2019 Nitish Rana is a good bat and a Kedar Jadhav kind of bowler. Will be a good addition to the T20 side
vvvslaxman Posted November 3, 2019 Author Posted November 3, 2019 As a batsman and fielder Rana is already better than Krunal. This guy just bowls everything at 110 kph. Eventually teams will start lining up against him.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now