Jump to content

Runs Scored Against Pakistan, Do They Mean Anything


Khota

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, Shaz1 said:

Gonna be bold here. As a Pakistani supporter It makes me sick Amir got a chance to play for Pakistan again after what he did. Since his return he has been looking less interested in performing. I’d take a Junaid Khan or Umar Gul than another Amir.

Amir as a youngster made a mistake. All of us make a mistake. That does not mean end of a career. Plus he keeps Kohli humble.

Posted
3 hours ago, -Robin- said:

Its sad that indian team does not play with pakistan we could have improve our H2H against them.

H2H means nothing to me.

Posted (edited)

You could add runs against Australia in Australia against old ball counts nothing as well lol Yasir shah 100, Rizwan couple of 50s. Now we know how Jaddu, Pant feasted on that hapless tiring attack.

Edited by vvvslaxman
Posted
On 12/1/2019 at 6:43 PM, sandeep said:

Did you see how he got out?  He was slogging for quick runs to declare.

that cannot be an excuse. Every batsman would come across such situations.   4 & 36(64 balls)  indicate that his were failed attempts at what he was doing.

Posted
5 hours ago, rtmohanlal said:

that cannot be an excuse. Every batsman would come across such situations.   4 & 36(64 balls)  indicate that his were failed attempts at what he was doing.

Sure, but did you see any of his dismissals?  I suggest you do before passing judgement.

Posted
1 hour ago, sandeep said:

Sure, but did you see any of his dismissals?  I suggest you do before passing judgement.

i watched them and this has nothing to do with what I stated. Every batsman in the team would have to  face such situations of quick scoring. For instance in the recent 1st test vs SAF,  India needed quick runs  in the 2nd inns.

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/19430/scorecard/1187007/india-vs-south-africa-1st-test-icc-world-test-championship-2019-2021

 

Jadeja,Kohli & Rahane did their roles to perfection  & only Jadeja got out after scoring 40 of  mere  32 balls. If Smith could do any of these ,we can say that  he did his job. Only scoring 4 runs & 36 of 64 balls ( slow str:) means he was far off. In not every inns can a batsman take his own time  and build long  inns as he would like to. Quick scoring occasions too would come   and he needs to be upto the task.

Posted
24 minutes ago, rtmohanlal said:

i watched them and this has nothing to do with what I stated. Every batsman in the team would have to  face such situations of quick scoring. For instance in the recent 1st test vs SAF,  India needed quick runs  in the 2nd inns.

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/19430/scorecard/1187007/india-vs-south-africa-1st-test-icc-world-test-championship-2019-2021

 

Jadeja,Kohli & Rahane did their roles to perfection  & only Jadeja got out after scoring 40 of  mere  32 balls. If Smith could do any of these ,we can say that  he did his job. Only scoring 4 runs & 36 of 64 balls ( slow str:) means he was far off. In not every inns can a batsman take his own time  and build long  inns as he would like to. Quick scoring occasions too would come   and he needs to be upto the task.

"Ok Boomer".

Posted
3 hours ago, Shaz1 said:

Yup he did

I do not blame him. Test format is a form of abuse for fast bowler. They do net get time to recuperate.

Posted
1 hour ago, Shaz1 said:

I blame him cause PCB and the fans invested so much on this guy. Only to repay them by retiring in the toughest format of all time. He let go of being remembered as a great bowler of Pakistan cricket for mickey mouse cricket leagues. 

T20 is the real deal. Test cricket is a dying breed and has no relevance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...