Hardik Pandya mega discussion thread

[zen]

9 minutes ago, Adamant said:

So he listed out all of Pandya's innings in t20i cricket and went through each one and exposed your 2 kaudi ka allrounder , you got no retort and so you start your youtube comment routine here. 

 

If you don't understand cricket and don't have a IQ above 70 then please stick to YouTube. 

 

Beyond your understanding level ... 

Edited November 11, 2021 by zen

[zen]

5 minutes ago, Adamant said:

Leg byes don't count towards a batsman's score that has always been the case, as I said stick to YouTube. 

 

Good to know that you keep missing the point 

[sarcastic]

1 hour ago, Trichromatic said:

Pandya's innings v non-minnows in T20I.

 

Inn 1 - India 53/6 in 9.4 v SL. Pandya walked in, got out in 10.6 overs, scored 6(2), SR of 33. Basically Pandya failed when top order failed. Ashwin scored 31 in 24 balls in same match when he came to bat after Pandya.

Flop inning - 1.

 

Inn 2 - India 127/3 in 14.2 overs v SL. RR of 8.9 with both openers score big. Pandya walked in and scored 27 (12).

Flop inning - 1, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 3 - India chasing low score of 84 v Pakistan, Pandy walks in 76/4 in 14.2 overs. Scored 0(2)

Flop innings - 2, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 4 - India chasing 139 v SL. Pandya walks in at 121/4 in 16.5 overs. Scored 2(4)

Flop innings - 3, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 5 - India chasing 126 v NZ. Pandya walked in at 39/5 in 8.2 overs. Scored 1(7). India lost.

Flop innings - 4, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 6 - India 98/5 in 13.2 overs v Eng. Pandya scored 9 (12). SR of 75 when quick runs were needed. Got out at 118. Another scenario when team was scoring at over 7.5 RPO and Pandya needed to step up by scoring quicker. Instead of that he decided to play tuk tuk knock.

Flop innings - 5, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 7 - India 125/4 in 17.2 overs. Another scenario when team was scoring at 7.2 RPO. Needed quick runs. Pandya scored 2(3)

Flop innings - 6, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1. KL Rahul did Deryl Mitchell and scored 71 in same match.

 

Inn 8 - India 177/4 in 18.1 overs. Pandya 11 (4).

Flop innings - 6, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2.

 

Inn 9 - India 60/6 in 11.1 overs. Pandya scored 25(23) v Eng. India scored 118 and India lost.

Flop innings - 6, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2, tuk tuk when other failed - 1

 

Inn 10 - 158/1 in 16.4 overs. Pandya 0(2) v NZ, Openers scored 80 each in the match and India scored 202.

Flop innings - 6, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 11 - India 65/3 in 8.4 overs v NZ. Pandya 1(2). Kohli scored 65 in same match. India lost.

Flop innings - 7, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 12 - 8 overs innings. Pandya scored 14(10). Pandey scored at SR of 154 and Kohli at 216. India scored 19 runs in last 14 balls and Pandya faced 10 of those deliveries.

Flop innings - 7, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 1

 

Inn 13 - 243/2 in 18.4 overs v SL. Pandya 10(3). Openers scored 119 and 83 in the match

Flop innings - 7, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 1

 

Inn 14 - India chasing 81/3 in 13.2 overs chasing 136 v SL. Pandya 4(4) when batted ahead of Karthik and Dhoni. Got chance to bat 6+ overs.

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 1

 

Inn 15 - India 183/5 in 18.1 overs v SL. Pandya 13(7). SR of top order - 233, 184, 214. Pandya's SR 185. What's special there?

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2

 

Inn 15 - India 183/5 in 18.1 overs v SL. Pandya 13(7). SR of top order - 233, 184, 214. Pandya's SR 185. What's special there?

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2

 

Inn 16 - 111/3 in 13.1 overs v SA. Perfect stage for Pandya. Great start, wickets in hand. SR of top 4 - 137, 117, 159, 130.

Pandya 21(17) at SR of 123. 

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 1

 

Inn 17 - 111/5 in 17.1 overs v Eng. Perfect stage for Pandya. Wickets in hands, need a hitter who can give quick runs. Pandya 12(10) without getting dismissed. SR of 120 when batsman above him scored at 123, 135, 133.

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2

 

Inn 18 - India 151/3 in 14.5 overs v Eng. Pandya 33(14) when Rohit scored 100. Aother scenario when Pandya actually managed to score when India was already going great over 10 RPO. 

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2

 

Inn 19 - India 72/5 in 10.2 overs chasing 220. Pandya 4(4) v NZ.

Flop innings - 9, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2

 

Inn 20 - India chasing 212 v NZ. Lost by 4 runs. India 121/3 in 12.2 overs. Perfect stage for Pandya to win the game for India. Scored 21(11) and got out at 145 in 14.5 overs. Krunal and Karthik took India close to NZ score with SR of 200+.

Flop innings - 9, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1

 

Inn 21 - Ind 90/4 in 12.4 v SA. Another scenario when India was scoring at 7 RPO, stage was set for Pandya to score quickly as specialist hitter. Scored 4(7) at SR of 75.

Flop innings - 10, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1

 

Inn 22 - Ind 90/4 in 12.4 v Aus. Another scenario when India was scoring at 7 RPO, stage was set for Pandya to score quickly as specialist hitter. Jadeja 44(23), India scored 161. Pandya - 16(15) SR of 111.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1

 

Inn 23 - Ind 120/3 in 13.4 v Aus. Pandya 44(22). Probably only match where Pandya was able to score quicker than others when needed.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1

 

Inn 24 - India 100/4 in 13 overs. Pandya 20(13) v Aus. India needed 87 in 7 overs. Scenario similar to NZ v Eng where Kohli did Mitchell by scoring 85. Did Pandya do a Neesham? Instead Shardul scored at SR of 242 doing what Pandya was supposed to do. Kohli scored at much faster rate during that partnership.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1

 

Inn 25 - India 48/4 in 10 overs. Pandya 19(21). v Eng. India score 54 in next 74 overs and Shreays Iyer did hitting. Good knock of consolidator.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, 

 

Inn 26 - India 48/4 in 10 overs. Pandya 19(21). v Eng. India score 54 in next 74 overs and Shreays Iyer did hitting. Good knock of consolidator.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, 

 

Inn 27 - India 86/5 in 14.3 overs. India barely going at 6 RPO. With Kohli at crease, India needed a hitter to score quick runs. India scored 70 runs in next 33 balls. Pandya 17(15) v Eng at SR of 113.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

Inn 28 - India 144/5 in 16.2 overs, Pandya - 11(8) v Eng

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1.

 

Inn 29 - India 143/2 in 13.2 overs. Pandya - 39(17) v NZ.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1.

 

Inn 30 - India 127/4 in 15.2 overs. Going at 8 RPO, stage set for Pandya for quick runs. Scored 10(12).

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1.

 

Inn 31 - India 84/4 in 12.4 overs. Pandya scored 11(8) v Pak

Flop innings - 12, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

Inn 32 - India 48/4 in 10.1 overs. Pandya 23 (24) v NZ. 

Flop innings - 12, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 3, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

Great analysis.

I don't think anybody can refute the point-by-point analysis you have done here.
I would agree that Pandya has not been able to translate his potential to T20Is as much as he wanted or team India needed.

 

But, there is no denial of the fact that Hardik Pandya brings a different sense of joy and happiness when he is timing the balls to fours and sixes or when he is really bowling in rythym.
It is team India's responsibility to mould and utilize a player such as Pandya as he is extremely invaluable in essense, i.e. you cannot create a player with both the abilities through training.
It is like you cannot just create a diamond artificially and expect it to shine. Rather, you have to polish the gemstone you have and make it shine.

 

 

Ultimately, if Pandya did not contribute as much to team India, it is team India's loss to not extract that performance from him because of the scarcity of such raw talents like him.  

Edited November 11, 2021 by sarcastic

[Trichromatic]

1 hour ago, zen said:

 

Flop analysis ...

 

 

Those are facts. I didn't make those numbers up. Those are Pandya's performances.

 

Not my fault if you think those performances were flop.

[Trichromatic]

1 hour ago, zen said:

A lot of logical fallacies and reliance on perceptions: 

 

Ah ha, so now the genius condition is that if a pitch is bad for batting and others struggle, he has to play as if the pitch is a batting paradise and if it is a batting paradise and he is scores at even high strike rate, it does not count  

 

 

 

Bad for batting? That's the role of lower order hitter. They are suppose to provide acceleration later on. If team scores at 7 RPO, then expectation is that with specialist hitter, team should end up with 8-8.5 RPO. Instead of that Pandya scores at 6 RPO in such conditions. 

 

Scenario when others did well and Pandya played slower than what is normally expected from any lower order hitters

Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2,

Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2

Tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3,

Slower than what was needed in chase - 1,

Tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

Those are 9 out of 32 innings. 

 

If others have already scored at 9-10 RPO, then what's special in a lower order taking score to 10 RPO? Anyone can do it. That's minimum expectation, nothing special. And even in that scenario Pandya fails 50% of time. 

 

Also shows that Pandya can score only when Rohit, Dhawan, Rahul have already done everything. He doesn't add value on his own.

 

 

[zen]

1 hour ago, Trichromatic said:

Inn 31 - India 84/4 in 12.4 overs. Pandya scored 11(8) v Pak

Flop innings - 12, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

Error as I recall this inning from this WC 

 

India 84/4 in 12.4 overs (actually it is 12.2), when SDP actually walked in when Ind was 125/5 on the last ball of 18th over  ... Next over from Afridi went for 17 runs with SDP batting 

 

Conveniently ignoring Jadeja 13 off 13

 

 

Quote

 

Inn 32 - India 48/4 in 10.1 overs. Pandya 23 (24) v NZ. 

Flop innings - 12, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 3, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

 

Another inning that you listed from this WC -

 

Ind goes at 4.8 in the first 10, SDP goes at close to 6 (including getting out going for a 6 and one of his 6s stopped by brilliant NZ fielding) and it is supposed to be a bad inning when Weisa scored a similar fighting knock v Ind 

 

 

 

 

[zen]

10 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

 

Bad for batting? That's the role of lower order hitter. They are suppose to provide acceleration later on. If team scores at 7 RPO, then expectation is that with specialist hitter, team should end up with 8-8.5 RPO. Instead of that Pandya scores at 6 RPO in such conditions. 

 

If others have already scored at 9-10 RPO, then what's special in a lower order taking score to 10 RPO? Anyone can do it. That's minimum expectation, nothing special. And even in that scenario Pandya fails 50% of time. 

 

Also shows that Pandya can score only when Rohit, Dhawan, Rahul have already done everything. He doesn't add value on his own.

 

 

 

Not at all ... as posted earlier:

 

Most of the Ind players need to get to a 50 to improve their strike rates and averages. SDP = Ind's best when it comes to getting off the blocks quickly and making an impact versus competitive sides in T20s:

 

View overall figures

Primary team India

Opposition team Afghanistan  or Australia  or Bangladesh  or England  or India  or New Zealand  or Pakistan  or South Africa  or Sri Lanka  or West Indies

Runs scored less than or equal to 49

Qualifications runs scored greater than or equal to 500

Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)

Overall figures

Player	Span	Mat	Inns	NO	Runs	HS	Ave	BF	SR	100	50	0	4s	6s
HH Pandya	2016-2021	49	34	7	515	42*	19.07	368	139.94	0	0	2	33	27
SK Raina	2006-2018	68	58	9	1138	49*	23.22	883	128.87	0	0	3	109	36
MS Dhoni	2006-2019	89	79	40	1456	49	37.33	1170	124.44	0	0	1	103	46
V Kohli	2011-2021	59	54	6	1170	49	24.37	970	120.61	0	0	2	104	28
KL Rahul	2016-2021	34	30	2	534	47	19.07	453	117.88	0	0	3	49	17
RG Sharma	2007-2021	83	75	6	946	43	13.71	849	111.42	0	0	6	89	35
S Dhawan	2011-2021	56	54	2	989	47	19.01	899	110.01	0	0	2	105	23
Yuvraj Singh	2007-2017	47	41	5	635	41	17.63	583	108.91	0	0	1	36	34

 

 

Among players of other teams 

 

View overall figures

Primary team Australia  or England  or India  or New Zealand  or Pakistan  or South Africa  or Sri Lanka  or West Indies

Opposition team Afghanistan  or Australia  or Bangladesh  or England  or India  or New Zealand  or Pakistan  or South Africa  or Sri Lanka  or West Indies

Runs scored less than or equal to 49

Qualifications runs scored greater than or equal to 500

Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)

Overall figures

Player	Span	Mat	Inns	NO	Runs	HS	Ave	BF	SR	100	50	0	4s	6s
AD Russell (WI)	2011-2021	60	52	18	646	47	19.00	410	157.56	0	0	8	38	53
Shahid Afridi (PAK)	2006-2016	82	76	8	1089	49	16.01	727	149.79	0	0	8	76	62
NLTC Perera (SL)	2010-2021	75	66	20	903	49	19.63	625	144.48	0	0	8	71	41
JA Morkel (SA)	2005-2015	47	36	11	543	43	21.72	380	142.89	0	0	1	28	37
HH Pandya (INDIA)	2016-2021	49	34	7	515	42*	19.07	368	139.94	0	0	2	33	27
KP Pietersen (ENG)	2005-2013	29	28	3	727	47	29.08	522	139.27	0	0	1	76	15
GJ Maxwell (AUS)	2012-2021	62	56	7	865	46	17.65	643	134.52	0	0	1	67	38
JJ Roy (ENG)	2014-2021	46	46	1	840	49	18.66	640	131.25	0	0	6	84	36
AJ Finch (AUS)	2011-2021	62	62	6	1290	47	23.03	990	130.30	0	0	6	136	44
DA Miller (SA)	2010-2021	80	69	19	1166	47	23.32	897	129.98	0	0	0	76	43
SK Raina (INDIA)	2006-2018	68	58	9	1138	49*	23.22	883	128.87	0	0	3	109	36
JM Bairstow (ENG)	2011-2021	55	49	9	733	47	18.32	569	128.82	0	0	5	65	32
JC Buttler (ENG)	2011-2021	70	62	10	1026	46	19.73	807	127.13	0	0	4	84	38
AD Hales (ENG)	2011-2019	50	50	3	933	49	19.85	735	126.93	0	0	4	105	29
Q de Kock (SA)	2012-2021	45	45	4	1063	48*	25.92	838	126.84	0	0	2	115	36
SR Watson (AUS)	2006-2016	47	45	4	711	47	17.34	565	125.84	0	0	3	55	35

 

[Trichromatic]

7 minutes ago, zen said:

 

Error as I recall this inning from this WC 

 

India 84/4 in 12.4 overs (actually it is 12.2), when SDP actually walked in when Ind was 125/5 on the last ball of 18th over  ... Next over from Afridi went for 17 runs with SDP batting 

 

Conveniently ignoring Jadeja 13 off 13

 

 

 

Another inning that you listed from this WC -

 

Ind goes at 4.8 in the first 10, SDP goes at close to 6 (including getting out going for a 6 and one of his 6s stopped by brilliant NZ fielding) and it is supposed to be a bad inning when Weisa scored a similar fighting knock v Ind 

 

 

 

 

 

Comparing batsman with bowling AR.

[Trichromatic]

4 minutes ago, zen said:

 

 

Not at all ... as posted earlier:

 

Most of the Ind players need to get to a 50 to improve their strike rates and averages. SDP = Ind's best when it comes to getting off the blocks quickly and making an impact versus competitive sides in T20s:

 

View overall figures

Primary team India

Opposition team Afghanistan  or Australia  or Bangladesh  or England  or India  or New Zealand  or Pakistan  or South Africa  or Sri Lanka  or West Indies

Runs scored less than or equal to 49

Qualifications runs scored greater than or equal to 500

Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)

Overall figures

Player	Span	Mat	Inns	NO	Runs	HS	Ave	BF	SR	100	50	0	4s	6s
HH Pandya	2016-2021	49	34	7	515	42*	19.07	368	139.94	0	0	2	33	27
SK Raina	2006-2018	68	58	9	1138	49*	23.22	883	128.87	0	0	3	109	36
MS Dhoni	2006-2019	89	79	40	1456	49	37.33	1170	124.44	0	0	1	103	46
V Kohli	2011-2021	59	54	6	1170	49	24.37	970	120.61	0	0	2	104	28
KL Rahul	2016-2021	34	30	2	534	47	19.07	453	117.88	0	0	3	49	17
RG Sharma	2007-2021	83	75	6	946	43	13.71	849	111.42	0	0	6	89	35
S Dhawan	2011-2021	56	54	2	989	47	19.01	899	110.01	0	0	2	105	23
Yuvraj Singh	2007-2017	47	41	5	635	41	17.63	583	108.91	0	0	1	36	34

 

 

Among players of other teams 

 

View overall figures

Primary team Australia  or England  or India  or New Zealand  or Pakistan  or South Africa  or Sri Lanka  or West Indies

Opposition team Afghanistan  or Australia  or Bangladesh  or England  or India  or New Zealand  or Pakistan  or South Africa  or Sri Lanka  or West Indies

Runs scored less than or equal to 49

Qualifications runs scored greater than or equal to 500

Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)

Overall figures

Player	Span	Mat	Inns	NO	Runs	HS	Ave	BF	SR	100	50	0	4s	6s
AD Russell (WI)	2011-2021	60	52	18	646	47	19.00	410	157.56	0	0	8	38	53
Shahid Afridi (PAK)	2006-2016	82	76	8	1089	49	16.01	727	149.79	0	0	8	76	62
NLTC Perera (SL)	2010-2021	75	66	20	903	49	19.63	625	144.48	0	0	8	71	41
JA Morkel (SA)	2005-2015	47	36	11	543	43	21.72	380	142.89	0	0	1	28	37
HH Pandya (INDIA)	2016-2021	49	34	7	515	42*	19.07	368	139.94	0	0	2	33	27
KP Pietersen (ENG)	2005-2013	29	28	3	727	47	29.08	522	139.27	0	0	1	76	15
GJ Maxwell (AUS)	2012-2021	62	56	7	865	46	17.65	643	134.52	0	0	1	67	38
JJ Roy (ENG)	2014-2021	46	46	1	840	49	18.66	640	131.25	0	0	6	84	36
AJ Finch (AUS)	2011-2021	62	62	6	1290	47	23.03	990	130.30	0	0	6	136	44
DA Miller (SA)	2010-2021	80	69	19	1166	47	23.32	897	129.98	0	0	0	76	43
SK Raina (INDIA)	2006-2018	68	58	9	1138	49*	23.22	883	128.87	0	0	3	109	36
JM Bairstow (ENG)	2011-2021	55	49	9	733	47	18.32	569	128.82	0	0	5	65	32
JC Buttler (ENG)	2011-2021	70	62	10	1026	46	19.73	807	127.13	0	0	4	84	38
AD Hales (ENG)	2011-2019	50	50	3	933	49	19.85	735	126.93	0	0	4	105	29
Q de Kock (SA)	2012-2021	45	45	4	1063	48*	25.92	838	126.84	0	0	2	115	36
SR Watson (AUS)	2006-2016	47	45	4	711	47	17.34	565	125.84	0	0	3	55	35

 

This challenge is still open.

 

Cite 3-5 examples when he has done it in T20I, basically scenario where others are scoring at 6-7 RPO and Pandya comes in to change the momentum significantly by scoring at 10-12 RPO.

 

I am not denying that Pandya can score at 10 RPO when Rohit, Rahul, Dhawan, Kohli, Pant have scored at 9 RPO in 15 overs. Hardly anything great about it though.

 

[zen]

1 minute ago, Trichromatic said:

 

Comparing batsman with bowling AR.

 

Wasn't he send ahead to get going ... And then you want to present the information as if SDP walked in at 84/4 when he did almost at the 19th over with no time to settle down and still taking 17 runs off arfidi's over

[zen]

4 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

This challenge is still open.

 

Cite 3-5 examples when he has done it in T20I, basically scenario where others are scoring at 6-7 RPO and Pandya comes in to change the momentum significantly by scoring at 10-12 RPO.

 

 

Basically, what you are taking about his SDP scoring almost double the strike rate. He did that v AFG, he took 17 runs of Afridi's over, and there are tons of others. Against NZ, he went at run a ball when Ind's RR was 4.8 at 10 overs (you posted that!)

 

 

Cite me one example of when Tendulkar has performed in a world cup final when others have ... 

Edited November 11, 2021 by zen

[Trichromatic]

2 minutes ago, zen said:

 

Basically, what you are taking about his SDP scoring almost double the strike rate. He did that v AFG, he took 17 runs of Afridi's over, and there are tons of others 

 

 

Cite me one example of when Tendulkar has performed in a world cup final when others have ... 

 

Yes, double of 7 is 10.

 

Please create a separate thread about SRT. Don't go off topic.

 

 

[Trichromatic]

5 minutes ago, zen said:

 

Wasn't he send ahead to get going ... And then you want to present the information as if SDP walked in at 84/4 when he did almost at the 19th over with no time to settle down and still taking 17 runs off arfidi's over

 

Yes, because Pandya has failed consistently do it. 

 

Pandya scored at SR of 130 and Jadeja 100.

 

Next match Pandya scored at 95, and Jadeja 135.

 

Basically both add similar value.

 

Batsman v bowling AR.

[zen]

4 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

 

Yes, double of 7 is 10.

 

 

 

Ind at the end of 18 over was going at 7, 19th over went for 17 runs ... RR of 17 > 2x 7

Edited November 11, 2021 by zen

[zen]

Just now, Trichromatic said:

 

Yes, because Pandya has failed consistently do it. 

 

Nope, to maintain L-R combination, which failed as Jadeja failed ... 

[Trichromatic]

1 minute ago, zen said:

 

Ind at the end of 18 over was going at 7, 19th over went for 17 runs ... RR of 17 = 2x 7

 

I am not talking about entire Pandya's career.

 

Feel free to pick any 3-5 matches.

[Trichromatic]

1 minute ago, zen said:

 

Nope, to maintain L-R combination, which failed as Jadeja failed ... 

 

Yes, Pandya and Jadeja both are not good as batting options.

[zen]

1 minute ago, Trichromatic said:

 

I am not talking about entire Pandya's career.

 

Feel free to pick any 3-5 matches.

 

I already did in the WC itself ... and there many others where he went 2X RR 

[zen]

1 minute ago, Trichromatic said:

 

Yes, Pandya and Jadeja both are not good as batting options.

 

Obviously, you haven't watched SDP bat much ... Do you know that he was MoS v Aus recently? Do you know that he scored a couple of 90s in ODIs in Aus? 

[Trichromatic]

Just now, zen said:

 

Obviously, you haven't watched SDP bat much ... Do you know that he was MoS v Aus recently? Do you know that he scored a couple of 90s in ODIs in Aus? 

 

Please don't go off topic. This thread is not about SRT, ODIs, tests etc.