The biggest difference

[R!TTER]

In cricket post WW2 

[Chakdephatte]

It's the Kerry pecker league. Cricket would have never become a commercial sport without it. It was some thirty years before IPL.

 

Coverage quality of cricket changed forever.

Edited January 1, 2022 by Chakdephatte

[Norman]

T20.. 

 

*daylight*

 

Two new balls rule in ODIs

 

[Lord]

money.

 

 

[Vijy]

covered pitches, bouncer rule, protective gear, LBW rule, DRS, ODIs, T20s, the list hoes on.

[First class]

T20, it brought the badly needed money in cricket but lowered the passion and pride of playing for the country. And lowered the demand for test and ODI, which is a sad part. The only solution in my opinion is to keep T20 at franchise level and leave international cricket for ODI and tests only.

[Vijy]

2 hours ago, First class said:

T20, it brought the badly needed money in cricket but lowered the passion and pride of playing for the country. And lowered the demand for test and ODI, which is a sad part. The only solution in my opinion is to keep T20 at franchise level and leave international cricket for ODI and tests only.

what they could do is to keep the T20 WC and remove all useless bilterals.

[Lord]

2 hours ago, First class said:

T20, it brought the badly needed money in cricket but lowered the passion and pride of playing for the country. And lowered the demand for test and ODI, which is a sad part. The only solution in my opinion is to keep T20 at franchise level and leave international cricket for ODI and tests only.

 

how would it solve anything?Players will still retire 'to be with family' and show up in various leagues thereafter.