Jump to content

England vs South Africa Third Test Oval


sage

Recommended Posts

Posted
26 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

118 rolled over. Match done and dusted on first day itself. Hard to come back from this.

Don't forget putridevus's overlord coolie and co got bundled for 78 against the very same England albeit a stronge bowling lineup with wood playing. 

Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, Frustrated said:

 

But ICC will keep quiet, as usual. 

Icf are a bunch of tossers who still live off their parents and have no life in general or they are just neckbearded virgin dweebs. 

 

They are also massive white loving schyophants. So yea. Expect it. 

 

 

Edited by Jay
Posted

Dumbassery of SA TM in the 2nd test is getting clearly exposed with Jansen's all round performance. What a progress. From first series didn't look back. Bit like Jamieson.  Both can bat too.  They can also field well. 

Posted
3 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

Is there a point why they picked Mulder who is an ultra trundler.  If Ngidi is not injured then this is a ridiculous selection again.

Ngidi has fitness issues. He is very heavy. So he can't usually play more than 2 games unless he bowls on ultra bouncy pitches. He often takes crucial wickets too!!!

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Jay said:

Probably 150 tp win. Should be easy for the brits to rub their conjones on the servile saffers again

servile saffers still better than servile indians who went and got slaughtered in the 5th test as a tribute to queen lizzie. saffers lacking crucial players like bavuma (injured) and de kock (retired). their bowling is still high quality especially lambu jansen

Edited by Vijy
Posted
4 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

SA is wimping out of the series. Can't believe they got rolled over for such cheap scores at the oval in the 2nd dig. i understand the conditions were juicier on day 1. 

Because they are not that good, Indian bowlers made them look good.

Posted
1 minute ago, putrevus said:

Because they are not that good, Indian bowlers made them look good.

May be Duke vs Kookaburra?  I always knew their batting is not that good. They are just feisty. That's about it. Not in the class of ABDV/Amla/Smith/Kallis.  Also they have seasoned experienced bowlers who can make use of anything on the offer from the pitch.  India lacks that type of bowlers. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

May be Duke vs Kookaburra?  I always knew their batting is not that good. They are just feisty. That's about it. Not in the class of ABDV/Amla/Smith/Kallis.  Also they have seasoned experienced bowlers who can make use of anything on the offer from the pitch.  India lacks that type of bowlers. 

Nope Indian bowlers laid egg with Duke too against England. I feel bowling coach is the difference.

Posted
4 hours ago, Vijy said:

servile saffers still better than servile indians who went and got slaughtered in the 5th test as a tribute to queen lizzie. saffers lacking crucial players like bavuma (injured) and de kock (retired). their bowling is still high quality especially lambu jansen

Bavuma and van der dussen. Tbf we played an under strength team too. Not out of necessity. We just did it cause of politics. 

 

Yea Jansen makes them hard to beat in sena. Left arm angle with bounce is too much to handle in sen conditions. Without him they are so much weaker though. Also no butt cheeks. Ngidi unfit fellow. He is very crucial in sena conditions. He sucks in Asia but in sena he is needed. 

Posted
4 hours ago, putrevus said:

Again SA showing their lack of telent in their batting. So this losss should eliminate them.

They have always been England's bitches even in their best days under Smith. They only won once in England at that time. They also drew and lost once or twice at home to England. 

 

Posted
17 minutes ago, Jay said:

Bavuma and van der dussen. Tbf we played an under strength team too. Not out of necessity. We just did it cause of politics. 

 

Yea Jansen makes them hard to beat in sena. Left arm angle with bounce is too much to handle in sen conditions. Without him they are so much weaker though. Also no butt cheeks. Ngidi unfit fellow. He is very crucial in sena conditions. He sucks in Asia but in sena he is needed. 

hope we tour SA and eng again. with our crappy selections, we are bound to become their biatches again. it will be fun to see the indian batters squealing and squeaking in terror

Posted
17 minutes ago, Jay said:

They have always been England's bitches even in their best days under Smith. They only won once in England at that time. They also drew and lost once or twice at home to England. 

 

correct. eng have hammered them many a time in SA itself also. once they see eng, they grovel as though they were meeting the queen herself

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...