In the hindsight, did Kishan get a raw deal when SKY was selected ahead of him?

[Lord]

Yes Kishan should have been preferred simply for better body of work.

 

However SKY is not the biggest reason, let alone only.

 

Game was lost by Rahul tuk tuk before SKY came into the crease. And that below his usual spot.

[Lord]

1 hour ago, BlueBlood said:

The saddest thing was SKY was the biggest disappointment in the tournament.

 

Dravid and Rohit thought he will "learn" on the job.

 

Kishan would have definitely out performed SKY as he could have been played higher up in the order.

 

The reality is Indian fans deserve this type of team performance because SKY has been made captain of next T20 series and not a peep from the crowd.

 

Shameless.

 

Why should ODI performance affect T20 selection? He's pretty good there.

[Haarkarjeetgaye]

SKY sab Indian supporters ki trip le gaya. 

Useless 

[Majestic]

Yes he produced performance but seems the team management didn't had enough faith on him. Having said that, he won't have done too bad either. I think he would have done better than SKY in this whole tournament.

[Lord]

Just now, Majestic said:

Yes he produced performance but seems the team management didn't had enough faith on him. Having said that, he won't have done too bad either. I think he would have done better than SKY in this whole tournament.

 

They could have both once we qualified and selected one for knockouts

 

I thought they had full confidence in SKY but then they sent Jaddu ahead in all important finals

[neel roy]

Yes he got a raw deal and not raw sushi. 19 ball 17 till now in flat t20 pitch.