Lord Posted December 6, 2023 Share Posted December 6, 2023 Mentally he was not there, especially after Hughes incident. His career is like that of Flintoff, 2-3 box office series among lot of mediocrity. Link to comment
BlueBlood Posted December 6, 2023 Share Posted December 6, 2023 3 hours ago, Lord said: Mentally he was not there, especially after Hughes incident. His career is like that of Flintoff, 2-3 box office series among lot of mediocrity. But which pace bowler really had a career where they were good throughout? Even the hyped up Shami was a dud all along until this world cup (hence why Hardik and Thakur were preferred over him) Less said about Bumrah and Siraj the better. Even Brett Lee, Tait, Akhtar, Steyn, Shaheen, Gillespie etc. same could be said. This is exactly why stat padding is so dangerous. It does not take into account IMPACT. Example: can the captain trust the bowler to get them wickets in crucial situations at any point in the match? You need to maximize your bowlers in their prime years and India always fails to do it and runs existing bowlers to the ground. Look at Bumrah - conceded 15 runs in first over of world cup and couldn't be relied upon after first 10 overs. He is easily the best pace bowler in Indian cricket history. Would Mitch Johnson do the same? NO. This idea of stats needs to be put to bed if tournaments need to be won. SKY who was carried the whole tournament failed in the only match where he needed to perform. This type of stuff was never the case with Bevan, Klusener and other similar batsmen. Link to comment
Chaos Posted December 7, 2023 Author Share Posted December 7, 2023 9 hours ago, Sgattick10 said: Damn thot Mitchel Johnson passed away. lol. He roided good like few us… but cmon let him atleast live 55-60.. Sgattick10 1 Link to comment
Lord Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 On 12/7/2023 at 3:51 AM, BlueBlood said: But which pace bowler really had a career where they were good throughout? Even the hyped up Shami was a dud all along until this world cup (hence why Hardik and Thakur were preferred over him) Less said about Bumrah and Siraj the better. Even Brett Lee, Tait, Akhtar, Steyn, Shaheen, Gillespie etc. same could be said. This is exactly why stat padding is so dangerous. It does not take into account IMPACT. Example: can the captain trust the bowler to get them wickets in crucial situations at any point in the match? You need to maximize your bowlers in their prime years and India always fails to do it and runs existing bowlers to the ground. Look at Bumrah - conceded 15 runs in first over of world cup and couldn't be relied upon after first 10 overs. He is easily the best pace bowler in Indian cricket history. Would Mitch Johnson do the same? NO. This idea of stats needs to be put to bed if tournaments need to be won. SKY who was carried the whole tournament failed in the only match where he needed to perform. This type of stuff was never the case with Bevan, Klusener and other similar batsmen. I'm talking about Test matches Bumrah,Shami,Steyn,Akhtar have much better legacy than Johnson in Tests. Link to comment
Gollum Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 Did he enjoy success outside Aus/RSA? Most Aussies have stellar records in RSA. Lord and harpicP 1 1 Link to comment
Gollum Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 Underachiever. Remember his debut against us in Malaysia where he blew apart our top order, before rain saved us. His bowling IQ wasn't that good, and tended to fall apart when attacked, unlike most Aussies. Link to comment
jf1gp_1 Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 title needed better wording. for a min i thought another aussie wicket down Link to comment
harpicP Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 Did the Hughes incident really affect his bowling??? I don't think so. It's just an excuse for failing outside those 2 test series. He was always good in bouncy conditions. He just isn't good anywhere else. Very average in Asia and bad in India. Hughes incident was sad but Sean Abbott who caused his demise is still playing ans actually is still part of the main squad. Link to comment
Lord Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 3 hours ago, harpicP said: Did the Hughes incident really affect his bowling??? I don't think so. It's just an excuse for failing outside those 2 test series. He was always good in bouncy conditions. He just isn't good anywhere else. Very average in Asia and bad in India. Hughes incident was sad but Sean Abbott who caused his demise is still playing ans actually is still part of the main squad. He lost the lethal bouncer edge due to the incident. It affects everyone differently. Was never good outside Aus/SA though (in Tests). harpicP 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now