Jump to content

Bangladesh Tour of Pakistan 2024(2 Tests) - Discussion Thread


Tillu

Recommended Posts

Posted

Pakistan are good at a sport when it is semi-professional and not many teams are present.

 

The moment it becomes professional Pakistan simply can't match investment/infrastructure and decline.

 

Bangladesh will become better in all 3 formats undisputed in the next decade. Afghanistan, by concentrating only on white ball and having access to IPL riches should also be a better white ball team. Even SL matches them well with a population of only 20 million.

 

Nepal etc might also compete well in 15-20 years. Then maybe some non Asian teams as well.

Posted
2 minutes ago, RizBarKhan said:

Nah that’s the most common Indian name. Those are Punjabi last names, I don’t see what that has to do with “playing both sides”, Swedes didn’t give up their Nordic names after converting to Christianity.

Kumar is not a "name"...it's a surname in modern definitions. Used specifically earlier for the "prince's", not anymore.
Most common surname in India is "Singh".

Posted
1 minute ago, singhvivek141 said:

Kumar is not a "name"...it's a surname in modern definitions. Used specifically earlier for the "prince's", not anymore.
Most common surname in India is "Singh".

I’ve met many Indian kumars. If it wasn’t common then Harold & Kumar wouldn’t be a thing, also Sangakara’s first name is Kumar.

Posted
10 minutes ago, bsriharsha said:

Bhai , kuch bhi. 

 

Federer's numbers are up there with Djoke or Nadal. 

In terms of grand slams it's Djoker > Nadal > Federer
In terms of head to head as well, Federer is behind these two.

Federer is graceful of the three, Nadal is sheer hard work, Djoker is an alien.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

It's amazing how much the famed Pakistan bowling attack declined with neutral umpires, cameras and stringent rules on chucking 

 

Feel bad for the Shaheens and Naseems. They'd be welcomed to raucous applause too if they could use bottle tops and fingers nails the way Immy and his boys did. 

 

Sadly, born in the wrong era. 

 

 

This. 100%

 

The likes of Naseem Shah, Wahab Riaz would have been on the levels of Waqar Younis if they got to bowl with tampered balls like in the 80s & 90s. Not to mention their extremely biased home umpiring before 1994-95. 

 

No wonder Pakistani 'ATG' pacers of past have much better records playing on Ultra flat & slow home pitches than on pace friendly SENA pitches.

 

Can't believe why more Indians don't call out these past cheaters, ball tamperers, chukers and dopers. 

 

Posted
Just now, AuxiliA said:

 

 

This. 100%

 

The likes of Naseem Shah, Wahab Riaz would have been on the levels of Waqar Younis if they got to bowl with tampered balls like in the 80s & 90s. Not to mention their extremely biased home umpiring before 1994-95. 

 

No wonder Pakistani 'ATG' pacers of past have much better records playing on Ultra flat & slow home pitches than on pace friendly SENA pitches.

 

Can't believe why more Indians don't call out these past cheaters, ball tamperers, chukers and dopers. 

 

Legacy effect.

 

As those Indians (And other countrymen) start getting older and the cricketing establishment gets filled with newer people who have never seen a strong Pak team, Pak's legacy will be forgotten - like Uruguay in football or Pak itself in hockey.

 

Thing is the two W's retired more than 20 years ago and the vast majority of Indians or Pakistanis have never seen a single ball by them live.

Posted
7 minutes ago, deathmonger said:

Pakistan is like Randhir Kapoor - legendary father, decentish child but themselves pure flop.

What fadu analogy bro, who should put this on Twitter and earn money :hysterical:

Posted
2 minutes ago, RizBarKhan said:

I’ve met many Indian kumars. If it wasn’t common then Harold & Kumar wouldn’t be a thing, also Sangakara’s first name is Kumar.

Again, Kumar isn't a name anymore. Many folks use it as a surname, though. It's similar to "Khan".
No one calls Bhuvaneshwar or Vinay or Praveen with their surnames...even no one calls Sangakkara as Kumar, not even British or Auzzie commies.
In west (specially UK) they have a habit of calling someone with their surnames as Mr. Kumar, Mr. Singh etc. US being US picked it up and gave it's own flavour. :--D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...