Strangering Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 Mitch Marsh dropped. Australia is all business. Team matters.
Vijy Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 44 minutes ago, Strangering said: Mitch Marsh dropped. Australia is all business. Team matters. Webster can do well. Should be easy win for Aus now.
AKane Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 39 minutes ago, Strangering said: Mitch Marsh dropped. Australia is all business. Team matters. Yeah but I don't think they are all business anymore. Marsh stayed too long... Also Starc who was 1/111 at MCG and he averages 44+ at SCG and who had some fitness issues at MCG is still in the side.
Vijy Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 2 minutes ago, AKane said: Yeah but I don't think they are all business anymore. Marsh stayed too long... Also Starc who was 1/111 at MCG and he averages 44+ at SCG and who had some fitness issues at MCG is still in the side. Starc was good in first 2-3 tests, irrespective of how many wkts he took. I think that he is why he's still in the squad. Selection of Marsh did happen for too long
Chalks Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 (edited) Beau Webster in for Marsh, as I sort of predicted. Said it before, the oldies in the Aussie side badly need a series win here so they can justify hanging around till end of Ashes series in 12 months' time (which is the endgame it seems a significant number of them have in mind). Edited January 2, 2025 by Chalks tweaker 1
Number Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 Rohit didn't come for PC, Gambhir came. Then he says this.. Looks like end of Rohit in tests.
Vijy Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 4 minutes ago, Number said: Rohit didn't come for PC, Gambhir came. Then he says this.. Looks like end of Rohit in tests. I don't believe it would happen. Same old Ro-Ko will play because Gambhir, selectors, BCCI, no one has the balls to drop them
saransh Posted January 2, 2025 Author Posted January 2, 2025 Akashdeep is out due to back issue. Guessing Rana or Prasidh could come in here
Vijy Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 Just now, saransh said: Akashdeep is out due to back issue. Guessing Rana or Prasidh could come in here Hindustan Times claims multiple changes, including Jurel for Pant (bad), someone for Akashdeep (okay if Akash is injured), and dropping one of the spin ARs for a pacer (bad, because SCG aids spinners to an extent, and batting becomes even weaker). No mention of parasitic Ro-Ko being dropped tweaker and saransh 2
Strangering Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 RoKo PR will drop 20cr in Gambhir's wife's offshore account. They can't be touched. There is simply WAY too much money riding on those two and more specifically Kohli. Besides, how lovely does that stadium look? Indian stadiums are still in 1950s despite the money. Shame. Number 1
Number Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 Pretty sure from this Bumrah will walk out for toss tomorrow.
Vijy Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 20 minutes ago, Number said: all nice and good, but the Hindustan Times article is singing a diff narrative Number 1
Vijy Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 14 minutes ago, Strangering said: RoKo PR will drop 20cr in Gambhir's wife's offshore account. They can't be touched. There is simply WAY too much money riding on those two and more specifically Kohli. Besides, how lovely does that stadium look? Indian stadiums are still in 1950s despite the money. Shame. Yeah, Ugly SOBs will cling on to their places no matter what
Texan Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 Since the two leaches cannot be touched, at least they should be shown their place in the team by batting them in the spot they deserve 1. Jaiswal 2. KL 3. Sundar 4. Nitish Reddy 5. Pant 6. Jadeja 7. Kohli 8. Sharma 9. Harshit 10. Bumrah 11. Siraj Akash Deep appears to be unfit. Vijy 1
AKane Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 1 hour ago, Vijy said: 1 hour ago, AKane said: Yeah but I don't think they are all business anymore. Marsh stayed too long... Also Starc who was 1/111 at MCG and he averages 44+ at SCG and who had some fitness issues at MCG is still in the side. Starc was good in first 2-3 tests, irrespective of how many wkts he took. I think that he is why he's still in the squad. Selection of Marsh did happen for too long Hey I am not complaining about Starc - he averages 56.xx for 7 wickets in 3 matches vs India at SCG. Even in this series except the night pink ball test, he has been mostly ineffective. May he continue with what he has done at the SCG vs India. As Napoleon said - never interrupt an opponent when he is making a mistake.
Texan Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 Ideally: 1. Jaiswal 2. KL 3. Gill 4. Sarfaraz 5. Pant 6. Jadeja 7. Reddy 8. Sundar 9. Harshit 10. Bumrah 11. Siraj
singhvivek141 Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 49 minutes ago, saransh said: Akashdeep is out due to back issue. Guessing Rana or Prasidh could come in here Lol... Akashdeep who in general is a super fit bowler is now deemed unfit. Same happened with Kuldeep Sen, back issue and now he has vanished from the surface of cricket. Hope that doesn't happen with Akashdeep. But this is Indian Cricket...bowlers are treated like trash bag, specially inexperienced ones who don't have any godfather and had toiled hard to climb through ranks.... saransh 1
bowl_out Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 1. Jaiswal 2. KL 3.Gill 4.Sarfaraz/Kohli 5.Washington 6.Pant/Jurel (wk) 7.Nitish 8.Jadeja 9.Rana 10.Bumrah (c) 11.Siraj
Vijy Posted January 2, 2025 Posted January 2, 2025 22 minutes ago, AKane said: Hey I am not complaining about Starc - he averages 56.xx for 7 wickets in 3 matches vs India at SCG. Even in this series except the night pink ball test, he has been mostly ineffective. May he continue with what he has done at the SCG vs India. As Napoleon said - never interrupt an opponent when he is making a mistake. I think Starc usually underperforms vs. us, but does show up in some useful moments. that's why they continue to play him. he is better than deadweight marsh
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now