Jump to content

Art of batting on tough pitches


Suhaan

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Dravid has a neutral stance. Doesn't go too deep, Doesn't bat outside the crease.  Always his upperbody moves in forward direction with feet planted unlike Kohli whose entire body including feet in the forward direction.   If he sense ball is too full his feet also move forward. If he senses it is short of a length his feet move. He has less things to adjust just in case if he had misjudged his length.  In other words he doesn't commit himself too early. This makes him one of the hardest batsman to dismiss in cricket. In entire cricketing history only 3 batsmen have 100 balls per inning average. Dravid leads the pack.

 

Dravid: 109.3

Kallis: 103.2

Border: 101.9

 

 

Edited by vvvslaxman
Posted
9 hours ago, Suhaan said:

Where has it gone?

Why can't we get orthodox top order?

 

 

this must be 2001 or so ... there is another set of innings where he single handedly won the test in 2006 vs West Indies. The 3 tests were all drawn and Brian Lara got a venomous pitch for the final test and Dravid got our first series win in West Indies after 35 years or so

 

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/india-tour-of-west-indies-2006-219430/west-indies-vs-india-4th-test-239923/full-scorecard

Posted
3 minutes ago, diga said:

 

this must be 2001 or so ... there is another set of innings where he single handedly won the test in 2006 vs West Indies. The 3 tests were all drawn and Brian Lara got a venomous pitch for the final test and Dravid got our first series win in West Indies after 35 years or so

 

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/india-tour-of-west-indies-2006-219430/west-indies-vs-india-4th-test-239923/full-scorecard

 

That was one of the most treacherous pitch. Lara was full of praise for those knocks as he said it was unplayable on that pitch.

Posted
2 hours ago, diga said:

 

this must be 2001 or so ... there is another set of innings where he single handedly won the test in 2006 vs West Indies. The 3 tests were all drawn and Brian Lara got a venomous pitch for the final test and Dravid got our first series win in West Indies after 35 years or so

 

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/india-tour-of-west-indies-2006-219430/west-indies-vs-india-4th-test-239923/full-scorecard

Ambrose retired in 2000,this must be from 97

That too had tough pitches where we were unable to chase paltry 120 , Frankin Rose was wrecker in chief

Posted
40 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Ambrose retired in 2000,this must be from 97

That too had tough pitches where we were unable to chase paltry 120 , Frankin Rose was wrecker in chief

In 97, Dravid must have been 25 years or so... Just shows that a youngster with better reflexes has a better chance of survival than a  36 year old 

Posted
15 minutes ago, jf1gp_1 said:

I partially blame fans as well. 

 

Pujara, Vihari low SR in test cricket was almost always a topic of discussion.  

Dravid still had many shots in his armoury

Posted
10 hours ago, Suhaan said:

Ambrose retired in 2000,this must be from 97

That too had tough pitches where we were unable to chase paltry 120 , Frankin Rose was wrecker in chief

VVS/Ganguly/Dravid were young but there was no excuse for Sidhu/Azhar/Nayan Mongia in that test... 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...