Show_stopper Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 Has Ishant been "rested"? I guess he is too good to bowl against Bangladesh eh?:winky::hysterical: Bangladesh are just there to make up the numbers Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 My bad.. didn't check the squad fully. Okay. Dinda is in. This is not really an important series. They could have rested Sree as well. Link to comment
Lord Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 You didnt give a straight answer for the below point' date=' why should i return the favour :giggle:[/quote'] i did actually,lemme repeat myself incase i wasnt clear.u brought IPL in the mix,not me.since skipping IPL was the subject we were debating on,Dhoni was the obvious reference i could pick. now ur turn:dance: Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 Bangladesh are just there to make up the numbers Their last 2 years record against top teams (excluding the minnow Windies) Played 27 Lost 25 :hysterical: Link to comment
spectre Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 i did actually,lemme repeat myself incase i wasnt clear.u brought IPL in the mix,not me.since skipping IPL was the subject we were debating on,Dhoni was the obvious reference i could pick. now ur turn:dance: answer was in the 1st point i made about Dhoni 'Did i support that' which means i didn't whats next Link to comment
Lord Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 answer was in the 1st point i made about Dhoni 'Did i support that' which means i didn't whats next ok.i missed that,thanks for clearing it up:two_thumbs_up: Link to comment
Kriterion Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 India should have sent some under-19 team. Chances are we will still get to finals. Bangladesh is an useless team who banks on massive under-performance from the opposition to pull off upsets. EVERY team relies on some sort of underperformance from the opposition to win. Link to comment
Texy Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 good to see sachin rest....he'll be fresh for the tests Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 EVERY team relies on some sort of underperformance from the opposition to win. No.. only bangladesh does that. If you win atleast 40% of the matches you have played you can claim that. After losing 90% of the matches.. then you cannot put yourself in that club. I just put up the record of Bangladesh in the last 2 years against top teams. played 27 lost 25. How would you even say that you have equal chance to beat anyone. Link to comment
Cricketics Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 I would rather have Ajinkya Rahane, or Murali Vijay, or Robin Uthappa or Tanmay Srivastav instead of undeserving Rohit Sharma. Link to comment
Sachinism Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 n u agree that Dhoni was being inconsistent in playing IPL 2008 n skipping test series in SL' date='yes or no?[/quote'] Dhoni didn't feel he was fit enough to play, or he could have further aggravated his back. Its gonna benefit him and the team in the long run, so thats fine Link to comment
Kriterion Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 No.. only bangladesh does that. If you win atleast 40% of the matches you have played you can claim that. After losing 90% of the matches.. then you cannot put yourself in that club. I just put up the record of Bangladesh in the last 2 years against top teams. played 27 lost 25. How would you even say that you have equal chance to beat anyone. thats why i said "some sort" of underperformance. of course the degree varies team to team. but no team will beat a team that performs at 100% maximal performance. even when australia lost to SA after scoring 434, their bowling "underperformed" and thats why SA chased it down. Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 thats why i said "some sort" of underperformance. of course the degree varies team to team. but no team will beat a team that performs at 100% maximal performance. even when australia lost to SA after scoring 434, their bowling "underperformed" and thats why SA chased it down. For Bangladesh it requires huge huge under performance from others. And also BD has to perform well above their skills. That is why they win rarely. Link to comment
punjabi_khota Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 thats why i said "some sort" of underperformance. of course the degree varies team to team. but no team will beat a team that performs at 100% maximal performance. even when australia lost to SA after scoring 434, their bowling "underperformed" and thats why SA chased it down. Thats the most ****ed up logic I have read here in a while. Every team "sort" of sucks too, and degree varies. BD suck 100% and India sucks 1%. Just the degree variation, right ?:finger: Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 Thats the most ****ed up logic I have read here in a while. Every team "sort" of sucks too, and degree varies. BD suck 100% and India sucks 1%. Just the degree variation, right ?:finger: Thing that ticks me off about BD fans is they are far too arrogant for their pathetic display at the internationals for a decade. Link to comment
PotterManiac Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 The squad is fine....except for the fact that Tyagi's had enough sitting on the bench, starting from the Ind-Aus series....I mean, there is no surity that he is going to take lots of wickets if he plays, but you still gotta play him in your XI! Atleast I'm happy that India won the ongoing series already...as it gives Tyagi the chance to perform or fail :D Link to comment
Kriterion Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 Thats the most ****ed up logic I have read here in a while. Every team "sort" of sucks too, and degree varies. BD suck 100% and India sucks 1%. Just the degree variation, right ?:finger: einstein's theory of special relativity also relies on effed up logic...doesn't mean its wrong tho. Link to comment
punjabi_khota Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 einstein's theory of special relativity also relies on effed up logic...doesn't mean its wrong tho. comparing yourself to einstein is the logical next step after comparing BD to India. Well done. Link to comment
Kriterion Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 comparing yourself to einstein is the logical next step after comparing BD to India. Well done. you're right...me and einstein are only an aproximate analogy ;) if you have some free time, i can teach you the difference between comparisons and analogies. Link to comment
punjabi_khota Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 you're right...me and einstein are only an aproximate analogy ;) if you have some free time, i can teach you the difference between comparisons and analogies. You can also teach me how to find 10 positives out of every test defeat by an innings, since there is nothing else to do for a BD cricket supporter. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now