coffee_rules Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 UDRS causing Eng to Draw a test....:mad: :banghead: Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
panesarv Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 The good thing about this system is more batsmen are just walking off now. Its ****in awesome!!!! :D :D Link to comment
fineleg Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 To me the best part was using hawkeye all the way instead of the half and half approach ... I was pleasantly surprised by that Boss Bhai, Did they use Hawkeye trajectory to see if it would hit the stumps?? or just whether it pitched in line or not? If they are using trajectory, isn't it inaccurate? The good thing about this system is more batsmen are just walking off now. Its ****in awesome!!!! :D :D We will hopefully see the day when Marirs_Mania is pwned for not wanting technology to take over charming umpiring :D Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Guest Hiten. Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 We will hopefully see the day when Marirs_Mania is pwned for not wanting technology to take over charming umpiring :D If SCG fiasco did not change his mind about the charmness, nothing will. Link to comment
yoda Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I think M_M is currently planning an exit strategy from the "Charmness" school without it looking too obvious. :--D Link to comment
I_India Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 More working technology the better. Link to comment
Lord Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 i must admit i am liking i am liking this new version of review instead of one used in SL.This one is more transparent n broadcaster shows for everyone whether its pitching,in line,hitting or not.with Hotspot in use it also clears the edges It has been as successful as any introduction of a new aspect to a game can be. The best thing about it is the "umpire's call" part of it, which gives priority to an on field judgment in case of a doubt. There are still improvements that can be made like making similar technology available in all matches and perhaps reducing the number of incorrect challenges from 2 to 1 per innings, but those are all minor bumps. Overall, it has been a success and I still don't see 2 day test matches that people were anticipating. actually thats the part i dont like about it.benefiit of doubt should always go the batsman.he shouldnt be given unless there is conclusive evidence hes out Link to comment
saneindian Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 I am a huge fan of UDRS but I wonder how they are using the hawk eye to decide if the ball is hitting the stumps or not for LBW calls. Not too long, everyne used to say hawk eye is only partially correct and if it was to be used for LBWs, no batsman can ever score a 100!! And if I am not wrong, hawk eye wasn;t part of the UDRS when it was used for the first time in the Ind-SL series. Link to comment
Lord Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 I am a huge fan of UDRS but I wonder how they are using the hawk eye to decide if the ball is hitting the stumps or not for LBW calls. Not too long, everyne used to say hawk eye is only partially correct and if it was to be used for LBWs, no batsman can ever score a 100!! And if I am not wrong, hawk eye wasn;t part of the UDRS when it was used for the first time in the Ind-SL series. it was,but it was only used till thepoit of impact of the ball.i think the current system is far more transparent n right Link to comment
Don Sharma Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 The UDRS is good but there are some scumbags who make a mockery of it like Stu Board for instance. But overall no complaints. Link to comment
urbestfriend Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 i must admit i am liking i am liking this new version of review instead of one used in SL.This one is more transparent n broadcaster shows for everyone whether its pitching,in line,hitting or not.with Hotspot in use it also clears the edges actually thats the part i dont like about it.benefiit of doubt should always go the batsman.he shouldnt be given unless there is conclusive evidence hes out No, for that to happen, technology should be 100% foolproof. When thats not the case, it is better that benefit of doubt going to umpire than batsman. Link to comment
The Outsider Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 actually thats the part i dont like about it.benefiit of doubt should always go the batsman.he shouldnt be given unless there is conclusive evidence hes out In most of these cases we're talking about height when it's just clipping the bails. For some reason I think the height aspect of hawk eye isn't very good. Of course there was the North appeal, but there have been a couple of other occasions as well when it seemed just not right. It might be due to the placement of cameras or it might indeed be true that the device is right, but it does not "look" right. In these borderline cases I would go with the umpire's call because as far as judging height is concerned he is in one of the best positions. Link to comment
cowboysfan Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 the system is the same for both teams,it may have flaws and the tech will get better but i dont think we need to involve umpires in more judgement calls than they need to .. Link to comment
fineleg Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Can BCCI babus ensure UDRS is used for the Ind-SA Test series? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now