Jump to content

Discussing the second test between Ind-BD at Dhakka, 2010


asterix

Recommended Posts

Posted
Good ole Dhoni. I think we should have dual captaincy' date=' Sehwag for the press and Dhoni for the field. It'll be perfect.[/quote'] :two_thumbs_up::haha::haha:
Posted
Time for a new conspiracy theory from Morriz Mirror.
No more theories. Why should I waste my precious time coming up with all these 'theories' only to be laughed at by people like fire_brigade :D
Posted

So what Dhoni is essentially saying is that there are plenty of bad reasons because of B'desh cannot take 20 wickets.. Sneaky..! :laugh:

Posted
So what Dhoni is essentially saying is that there are plenty of bad reasons because of B'desh cannot take 20 wickets.. Sneaky..! :laugh:
Dhoni has carefully selected his words. Sehwag had said that BD can not take 20 Indian wickets. Dhoni said "there is no reason why they should not take 20 wickets". That does not translate to they 'can' take 20 Indian wickets. There is a lot of difference between 'should' and 'can'. As an international side playing for several years, they should. But can they?
Posted
Dhoni has carefully selected his words. Sehwag had said that BD can not take 20 Indian wickets. Dhoni said "there is no reason why they should not take 20 wickets". That does not translate to they 'can' take 20 Indian wickets. There is a lot of difference between 'should' and 'can'. As an international side playing for several years' date=' they should. But can they?[/quote'] Exactly, Dhoni just merely repeated what Viru said a week ago.. Yet, lets watch the B'deshi fans heap praise on Dhoni for his 'modesty'..:laugh:
Posted
Dhoni has carefully selected his words. Sehwag had said that BD can not take 20 Indian wickets. Dhoni said "there is no reason why they should not take 20 wickets". That does not translate to they 'can' take 20 Indian wickets. There is a lot of difference between 'should' and 'can'. As an international side playing for several years' date= they should. But can they?
They can, but will India allow them to?
Posted
Dhoni can also be blunt. But he generally does that when he assesses about our own team. He doesn't say much about opposition.
Very true. And that is something I dont enjoy sometimes. Criticism within ranks must be for the dressing room. Not for the public and press at large. That is how I see it. ________ WEB SHOWS
Posted
Dhoni has carefully selected his words. Sehwag had said that BD can not take 20 Indian wickets. Dhoni said "there is no reason why they should not take 20 wickets". That does not translate to they 'can' take 20 Indian wickets. There is a lot of difference between 'should' and 'can'. As an international side playing for several years' date=' they should. But can they?[/quote'] Exactly
Posted
Sehwag pwned
Read his statement carefully .. Dhoni indirectly said that if Bangles cannot take 20 wickets then they are not worthy of playing test cricket.. read his statement properly and you will realize what he has said :winky:
Posted
Exactly, Dhoni just merely repeated what Viru said a week ago.. Yet, lets watch the B'deshi fans heap praise on Dhoni for his 'modesty'..:laugh:
:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Pure evil Dhoni :haha::haha:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...