thevortex Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 Nobody is asking you to believe anything. You are free to have your views, so can others.. Why are you bringing 'Hawkeye' in every discussion? Looks like you have been scarred for life. Don't worry..Get well soon... :-) Asterix - I was trying to be civil to you in case you did not recognize.
asterix Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 Look mate, nobody gives a rat's **** to what you or me or anybody believes and posts in a forum. Don't get your panties in twist in trying to find out 'evidence, proof, authortitative proof, certificates' etc. and don't just try to be full of yourself..Things will happen as they are meant to be..You and me have no control over that.
Params7 Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 lol denial can be a funny thing. I don't even care if the cheats escape with a slap on the wrist, Pakistan is a joke and so are all their scripted matches.
The Outsider Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 The point, in case it was not clear, is this. Is there irrefutable proof of wrongdoing by the players? If there is, then what is the delay in saying so by the board? It is not that I am not wary of PCB's dubious distinction in the case of disciplinary hearings. Just that in this case, I do really wish that the career of somebody as good as Aamer is not derailed. At least not without reason. Just wanted to explain why I wanted to see irrefutable proof. Not that this too was not clear earlier. Here you go : Police investigating alleged corruption involving Pakistani cricketers believe that video evidence crucial to the case is authentic, BBC Sport understands. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/cricket/england/8964408.stm Irrefutable enough, yet?
thevortex Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 Look mate' date=' nobody gives a rat's **** to what you or me or anybody believes and posts in a forum. Don't get your panties in twist in trying to find out 'evidence, proof, authortitative proof, certificates' etc. and don't just try to be full of yourself..Things will happen as they are meant to be..You and me have no control over that.[/quote'] Were you advising yourself? You are the one getting agitated and chasing me around with mentions of 'proof' and 'evidence' that you were unable to produce. If you are unaffected by posts on the forum, it sure does not look like that. :)
thevortex Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 Here you go : http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/cricket/england/8964408.stm Irrefutable enough, yet? It is getting there, Outsider. Seemingly slowly but surely. But lets wait for Scotland Yard's affirmation. This is painful.
punjabi_khota Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 Here you go : http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/cricket/england/8964408.stm Irrefutable enough, yet? :hysterical::hysterical: Look at that buddha high commissioner *********, "videos COULD have been shot after the game" ...saala he is not even confident enough to say they were definitely shot after the game, EVEN AFTER MEETING WITH THE PLAYERS.....tells us all there is to know. :hysterical::hysterical:
asterix Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 Looks like the Pak HC too is a passionate member of you know where.. He has not even seen the video and is asking questions about it's authenticity..
yoda Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 Brilliant strategy by the PCB. Deny everything and hope it goes away. What's the worst thing that can happen? A ban by the ICC? Then they can claim to be victims of injustice.
The Outsider Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 It is getting there' date=' Outsider. Seemingly slowly but surely. But lets wait for Scotland Yard's affirmation. This is painful.[/quote'] Scotland Yard is not going to make any official statements while the investigation is ongoing, but BBC is no rag news agency who are going to publish stuff without verifying it's authenticity and sources.
King Tendulkar Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 It is getting there' date=' Outsider. Seemingly slowly but surely. But lets wait for Scotland Yard's affirmation. This is painful.[/quote'] You are so delusional its sad. SY are treating the video as AUTHENTIC. Next will be SY are in on the conspiracy to defame pakistan and islam:hysterical: Dude no one needs to frame paks to make pak look bad, you do that very well on your own. I mean the pak high commisioner is another example(although I do find him pure comedy I must admit), claims they are innocent. Starts acting as their defence lawyer, then when asked about the no balls says he has not seeen the videos:hysterical:When asked why so catgorically stating that innocent comes up with zero:hysterical:
King Tendulkar Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 Why are pak govt so desperate to defend these pak traitors, bizzare. Pakland has such a big chip on its shoulder that even turns cricket cheats in to some big political thing. What losers. Really despair at pak and its people who also now want to defend their traitors. The evidence is so compelling yet some how a conspiracy theory is cooked up. Internet should be banned in pak cos of all the crazy conspiracy theories which get spread like chineses whispers
King Tendulkar Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 Tour managers says they are dropped, then about 10 mins later high commisioner says they dropped out themselves cos of MENTAL TORTURE due to allegations.:hysterical:
Ram Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 ‘mental torture..’… :hysterical: Even a 10 year old can draw up a better press release than that.. :cantstop:
Macj Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 So the esteemed High Commissioner thinks the doofuses at NOTW filmed it after and made it public , he didn't stop to question why they would do such a stupendously idiotic thing. The only thing I gather from this sordid affair, is they're all in on it, PCB probably knew this all along, so much so that they probably reprimanded Yousuf and Co in the first place only because they weren't subtle enough in the act.
Gunner_Mania Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 skyNews says Scotland yard is going to interview question the 3 players individually tomorrow.
Mohalla_Cricket Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 His highness is known for uttering bullshit. According to him "26/11 plan is hatched on ship in international waters".
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now