Has any one seen Bhuvneshwar Kumar bowl here ?

[King Tendulkar]

Aaorn has quality for tests. Just needs to prove has stamina. I think frankly a few good games of ranji to show good speeds and fit. Then he is serious contender for test place. Needs a year in team to improve and develop, like yadav got. An attack of Yadav, aaron and Ishant is in my mind the attack of the future

[The Outsider]

An attack of Yadav, aaron and Ishant is in my mind the attack of the future

:hysterical::hysterical: Aaron has hardly bowled in FC and Ishant is a tried and tested failure.

[saneindian]

Yadav, Ishant and Zak were there in Australia..didn't help us much

[Magneto]

Waiting to see reactions of people when he gets smashed in flat pattas. BK is good with the new ball, and very average at the death. He is reasonably accurate, so would be able to bowl comparatively miserly spells during middle overs (hopefully).

[panther]

Ishant should be left out of the team, had enough chances unless he want's to break sami test bowling average. I don't think aaron will ever be a test bowler with that action and lack of movement.

[rkt.india]

Yadav' date=' Ishant and Zak were there in Australia..didn't help us much[/quote'] Its not just about names but performing as a unit which they didnt in Australia. they did have some good individual performances and they can always improve as they are young. Making a group of bowlers is more important and then play the best of them.

[rkt.india]

Hopefully, Yadav, Ishant, Shami, Pankaj and Pandey can form a good test attack in SA next year.

[Lord]

Hopefully' date=' Yadav, Ishant, Shami, Pankaj and Pandey can form a good test attack in SA next year.[/quote'] not Ishant,hes failed in last series there n failed overall.enough chances given to him. PK if fit or Sandeep Sharma can be better bet in SA conditions ala Philander

[Magneto]

Hopefully' date=' Yadav, Ishant, Shami, Pankaj and Pandey can form a good test attack in SA next year.[/quote'] Pandey will do well to make it to the India-A team. Pankaj will surely get selected in the India-A team, and his further selection depends on how well he does there. Ishant may be dropped after the Australia series.

[rkt.india]

Pandey will do well to make it to the India-A team. Pankaj will surely get selected in the India-A team, and his further selection depends on how well he does there. Ishant may be dropped after the Australia series.

Both will be in India A team and then will go to SA. Jagdale will ensure that Ishwar Pandey is there. He and Shami are perfect bowlers for SA conditions. HOW they do or not do is a different thing. Regarding Ishant, one bowler's or presence wont make a big difference because no one is really proven or world class atm, but we will have to select potential talented bowlers and create a unit and let them improve.

[rkt.india]

not Ishant,hes failed in last series there n failed overall.enough chances given to him. PK if fit or Sandeep Sharma can be better bet in SA conditions ala Philander

Sandeep is too young, dont want to ruin him drafting so early in the team. We should not pick fast bowlers before the age of 22.

[rkt.india]

And this was the best delivery of 2010 which did not get a wicket.

that was jaffa.:hatsoff:

[panther]

Assif was one of its kind. Never seen a bowler like him. he was not swing bowler but used seam and could get cut.

Yh he was a very clever bowler, he would also use the crease very well, something which bowlers hardly do now a days.

[Lord]

Sandeep is too young' date=' dont want to ruin him drafting so early in the team. We should not pick fast bowlers before the age of 22.[/quote'] thats no rule.many fast bowlers infact r picked raw.Sandeep can be very good in SA conditions

[CG]

not Ishant,hes failed in last series there n failed overall.enough chances given to him. PK if fit or Sandeep Sharma can be better bet in SA conditions ala Philander

Pk :hysterical::hysterical: the guy should not be in A squad let alone international cricket ,cannot bowl at 125ks and gets injured everyday combined with a casual attitude.Good that he is gone. People forget whatever we have won abroad ,have been through good fast bowling ,we had enough of trundlers in our history and we know how they performed. You need to be around 135ks unless you are deadly accurate . Ishant has done well in the last series and has got his seam position sorted he will be handful on any pitch with yadav and a leftarmer like suyal or shami.We never had so much talent to work with in terms of fast bowling and i am looking forward to it.

[rkt.india]

thats no rule.many fast bowlers infact r picked raw.Sandeep can be very good in SA conditions

Yes. It has not worked in India's case because they come raw and because they lack a thing or two lose the plot like Irfan, Ishant, etc. He is only 19. He will only get better. It is not like he is a raw pace bowler. Moslty raw pace bowlers are picked at an early age. He should not be picked for at least 2 years rather need to be on A tours.

[panther]

Rkt what do you think of Bk a one match wonder or is he a possible prospect for India?

[gslv]

good bowling by the lad. had a great seam position.just need to get his speed a tad higher. and less said about dinda is better.man no variety no nothing. he is human shaped bowling machine. upper floor empty.

[exams]

:hysterical::hysterical: Aaron has hardly bowled in FC and Ishant is a tried and tested failure.

you are talking as if India has a history of producing world class fast bowlers.Ishant and zak are the two best fast bowlers over the last 5 years period

[rkt.india]

Rkt what do you think of Bk a one match wonder or is he a possible prospect for India?

He is pretty much like PK in pace and his swing skills. It is too early to judge him. If he is a better bat tecehnically then he can be a good alrounder. Yesterday, he was brilliant. If only he can increase his pace to 5-7k more with that swing, he can be a handy test bowler. Ahmedabad will be a test for him. Other thing is Pak batsmen did not know what he can do and that novelty factor also worked for him.