Cricket Tragic Posted October 19, 2011 Posted October 19, 2011 OK. Misunderstood that. What I was trying to say is that PK is a pretty good bowler, in spite of not being phaaaaaaaaaaast. Many ICFers too don't like him because of that slotting him with the BAD trundlers like Vinay Kumar which shouldn't be the case. Since the original reply was regarding good Indian fast bowlers it would be unfair to not mention PK, who has done well with his limited opportunities so far but many people tend to ignore him for lack of pace. Agree with that.
bhanu Posted July 4, 2012 Posted July 4, 2012 :hatsoff: to the youngsta beauty 1 fluke performance and he is a beauty B->
bulbul Posted July 4, 2012 Posted July 4, 2012 1 fluke performance and he is a beauty B-> in pak this is the meaning of youngsta beauty
Cricket Tragic Posted July 4, 2012 Posted July 4, 2012 He goes through large phases where he looks pretty mediocre tbh.
Old guy Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 He goes through large phases where he looks pretty mediocre tbh. +1 also against the same team :P still not bad but enough for them to lbel him as next legend after discarding him completely in last game ;P
panther Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 even sreesanth has had more than that. what in 27 test matches.
Vilander Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 Sreesanth is faster and more lethal than pak spear head, find of life time,future star Junaid. But the only problem with Sreesanth is he is too poor to play for India A team.
panther Posted July 10, 2012 Posted July 10, 2012 :hatsoff: haters gonna hate 3rd fluke performance now keep them coming
deathmonger Posted July 10, 2012 Posted July 10, 2012 :hatsoff: haters gonna hate 3rd fluke performance now keep them coming another in loss/draw. biggest match loser.
Utalk Posted July 10, 2012 Posted July 10, 2012 another in loss/draw. biggest match loser. Agree he should be scoring 100s to go with 5fers or else he is a match loser.
deathmonger Posted July 10, 2012 Posted July 10, 2012 Agree he should be scoring 100s to go with 5fers or else he is a match loser. it was sarcasm bro. lahori logic.
jusarrived Posted July 10, 2012 Posted July 10, 2012 Not that great tbh . I dont see a lot of potential either . Wahab should be brougt back inplace of Gul or Cheema , much better than any one in current linup imo
CoverDrive Posted July 10, 2012 Posted July 10, 2012 He is good. Can move the ball both ways and can bowl well around the wicket also.
Utalk Posted July 10, 2012 Posted July 10, 2012 Not that great tbh . I dont see a lot of potential either . Wahab should be brougt back inplace of Gul or Cheema , much better than any one in current linup imo Wahab is overrated. Wahab has no control because of his poor wrist position. Junaid has age on his side and has excellent control from round the wicket. Can move it both ways. Pace can be increased with time and hard work in gym.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now