Jump to content

"Ponting is our greatest one-day player and the second-best player to have played for Australia since Donald Bradman" - Dean Jones


Recommended Posts

Posted

Link: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/cricket-world-cup-2011/interviews/Ponting-should-consider-ODI-retirement-Jones/articleshow/7798760.cms

"Ponting is our greatest one-day player and the second-best player to have played for Australia since Donald Bradman. If Cricket Australia wants to take the captaincy off him, that's fine. But let Ponting decide when he wants to pull the plug in one-day and Test cricket. We need hard nuts like 'Punter' and he would love to help the young kids out,"
I consider Ponting a wonderful batsman. An absolutely phenomenal talent. But this is utter garbage. Yes, he is Australia's best ever ODI player. However, the best Australian player since Bradman? Give me a break! If we're talking about players, then Shane Warne is the best Australian player after Bradman. And even if we talk about the best Aussie batsman after Bradman, Ponting doesn't come second (at least in my books). For me the greatest Australian Test batsman after Bradman is Greg Chappell. And I'm pretty sure most experianced fans will agree. Then comes Ricky Ponting and Neil Harvey, who would both share the 3rd spot. Where would you place Ponting as a Test batsman among Australia's former greats?
Posted

border was a better test batsman than ponting. for me, ponting is 4th after bradman, border, chappell in tests. in ODIs, dean jones himself, michael bevan and adam gilchrist were on the same level as ponting IMO.

Posted
border was a better test batsman than ponting. for me, ponting is 4th after bradman, border, chappell in tests. in ODIs, dean jones himself, michael bevan and adam gilchrist were on the same level as ponting IMO.
Ponting is certainly a better batting talent than Border, no doubt about that. As for ODI cricket, Ponting, in my opinion, edges out Jones, Bevan and Gilchrist comfortably. Bevan's average is inflated by bloody 67 'not out' innings, add to that he has a much inferior strike rate compared to Ponting. Jones was a great ODI player, but Ponting edges him out due to the longevity factor. As for Gilchrist, he averages a lot less than Ponting, despite his incredible strike rate.
Posted
The Aussie media also said the same thing that he is the best Oz player after Bradman
Steve Waugh said that in 2006 when Ponting was going hammer and tons, and his Test average was above 59.
Posted
Steve Waugh said that in 2006 when Ponting was going hammer and tons' date=' and his Test average was above 59.[/quote'] During India vs Oz match or u can say match preview on Times Now they had asked the Aussie media abt Ponting,s future then too the media said he is the best player after Bradaman
Posted
border was a better test batsman than ponting. for me, ponting is 4th after bradman, border, chappell in tests. in ODIs, dean jones himself, michael bevan and adam gilchrist were on the same level as ponting IMO.
Good observations!!!! Of course all these ratings become a bit subjective when you have so many players that have played who are so good. Hard to argue against the players identified in the list for the categories.
Posted
border was a better test batsman than ponting. for me, ponting is 4th after bradman, border, chappell in tests. in ODIs, dean jones himself, michael bevan and adam gilchrist were on the same level as ponting IMO.
Yeah, that sounds about right - particularly Border, who played in a really difficult era for Australian cricket against some fearsome bowlers. We've seen how badly Ponting has struggled since the greats retired (and nothing like that quality of bowling) - Border carried an even worse team for years, astonishing mental strength.
Posted
Better Test batsman than Greg Chappell?
Ponting was better than both Greg and Border during his peak. So, yes he is best after Bradman amongst Aussies for sure. However, it is early to call on that unless he retires immediately. It would be need to be seen how he re-emerges after the present dark period of his career. If he can emerge positively he will definitely deserve the credit but in case he falters and retires then I might consider Greg and Border better than him. But it is still early to call as I dont think he would retire as of now. I do not like Ponting but he is still one of contemporary batting legends and no one can deny that.
Posted

We Indians have historically been biased against Ponting, maybe because he came within striking distance of Tendulkar. So we might dispute his greatness, but he would be viewed differently by the Australians who admire the very traits (ruthlessness, aggression) that we hate. He did lead the most dominant side in cricket since the windies of the 80s.

Posted

Along with being a great player, he was also an unbelievably good captain who won test series in every country he played in(eng as a player though not as captain) This is one trait which Lara and Tendulkar lack. They could not take the pressure of captaincy and even when Lara did he did himself no favours

Posted
Along with being a great player' date=' he was [b']also an unbelievably good captain who won test series in every country he played in(eng as a player though not as captain) This is one trait which Lara and Tendulkar lack. They could not take the pressure of captaincy and even when Lara did he did himself no favours
Not+Sure+if+serious.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...