The Outsider Posted April 29, 2011 Author Posted April 29, 2011 Again, I am not saying what he did was acceptable - it plainly isn't - but this doesnt fall under the realm of punishable crime. Playing the game against the spirit is a punishable offense according to the MCC rules - there is no rule official specific rule against something like Rashid Latif did, but he was still banned for playing the game against the spirit.
Ram Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 As I said' date=' this should have been given out under the existing rule of obstructing the field had the fielding side appealed. Warne missed a trick there.[/quote'] Huh? What was part of what bhajji did, prevented/obstructed any of the 11 royals fielders on the ground from carrying out any action?
Zelig Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 Shows that bambis are not just about running n escaping from tigers/lions..they are also cunning :hehe:
Stuge Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 video please ? only then I can give my special comments on mr bhajji for todays incident
CSK Fan Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 Ok, from cricinfo Nitin Sundar's dug this up from the laws: Deliberate short runs (a) Notwithstanding 4 above, if either umpire considers that either or both batsmen deliberately run short at his end, the umpire concerned shall, when the ball is dead, inform the other umpire of what has occurred. The bowler's end umpire shall then (i) warn both batsmen that the practice is unfair and indicate that this is a first and final warning. This warning shall apply throughout the innings. The umpire shall so inform each incoming batsman. So this is against the law too. Like Afridi, Bhajji seems to be constantly finding new illegal things to practise
sarcastic Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 Here is an excerpt from Cricinfo: Nitin Sundar's dug this up from the laws: Deliberate short runs (a) Notwithstanding 4 above, if either umpire considers that either or both batsmen deliberately run short at his end, the umpire concerned shall, when the ball is dead, inform the other umpire of what has occurred. The bowler's end umpire shall then (i) warn both batsmen that the practice is unfair and indicate that this is a first and final warning. This warning shall apply throughout the innings. The umpire shall so inform each incoming batsman. I think that clears it all!!!!!!!!!!! One deliberate short run allowed per batsman per match!!!!!!:cantstop:
The Outsider Posted April 29, 2011 Author Posted April 29, 2011 Huh? What was part of what bhajji did, prevented/obstructed any of the 11 royals fielders on the ground from carrying out any action? Not directly, but if Harbhajan attempted to keep strike under the spirit he would have either have missed a run or have been run out.
The Outsider Posted April 29, 2011 Author Posted April 29, 2011 Thanks for that clarification, MTC. IMO, there should be no warning, but at least there are some safeguards in place already.
rkt.india Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 As I said' date=' this should have been given out under the existing rule of obstructing the field had the fielding side appealed. Warne missed a trick there.[/quote'] how it was obstructing the field?
NareshK Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 Obstructing the field is completely different from running a short run.
vvvslaxman Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 Nitin Sundar's dug this up from the laws: Deliberate short runs (a) Notwithstanding 4 above, if either umpire considers that either or both batsmen deliberately run short at his end, the umpire concerned shall, when the ball is dead, inform the other umpire of what has occurred. The bowler's end umpire shall then (i) warn both batsmen that the practice is unfair and indicate that this is a first and final warning. This warning shall apply throughout the innings. The umpire shall so inform each incoming batsman. saw this on cricinfo.
The Outsider Posted April 29, 2011 Author Posted April 29, 2011 Anyhow, the law posted by MTC clearly shows that Harbhajan cheated even according to the official rules, forget about the spirit.
Stuge Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 Remember India vs England Short Run ..gifted us tie :( when will our players learn :(
NareshK Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 Anyhow' date=' the law posted by MTC clearly shows that Harbhajan cheated even according to the official rules, forget about the spirit.[/quote'] How can it be cheating if he does something that's within the rules ? Maybe its not within the spirit you mean.
The Outsider Posted April 29, 2011 Author Posted April 29, 2011 How can it be cheating if he does something that's within the rules ? Maybe its not within the spirit you mean. It's not within the rules - look at the extract MTC has posted. Deliberately taking a short run is illegal, and an official warning is given to the batsman.
NareshK Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 It's not within the rules - look at the extract MTC has posted. Deliberately taking a short run is illegal' date=' and an official warning is given to the batsman.[/quote'] According to the rules, one short run is allowed and a warning given for the batsman not to do it again. So the first run is not illegal and hence not cheating.
CSK Fan Posted April 29, 2011 Posted April 29, 2011 According to the rules' date=' one short run is allowed and a warning given for the batsman not to do it again. So the first run is not illegal and hence not cheating.[/quote'] LMAO, a warning is given because something is illegal. Any warning in any thing, from a court of law to a sports is given for doing something illegal. Its ok if you dont want to blame Bhajji, but in the future you should not blame a Afridi or a Ponting if they do womething which irks you
The Outsider Posted April 29, 2011 Author Posted April 29, 2011 According to the rules' date=' one short run is allowed and a warning given for the batsman not to do it again. So the first run is not illegal and hence not cheating.[/quote'] No, just means that the punishment for the first offense is an official warning - doesn't mean the action was legal.
Recommended Posts