vvvslaxman Posted July 23, 2011 Posted July 23, 2011 Ind bowled out for less than 300:(( Still PK has more wickets than any English bowlers.
jhakati Posted July 23, 2011 Posted July 23, 2011 Still PK has more wickets than any English bowlers. :giggle:
zen Posted July 23, 2011 Author Posted July 23, 2011 Still PK has more wickets than any English bowlers. Because others didnt compete for wkts and he happened to be in the right place at the right time. If zak were playing, he may not have got 5 er period PK is useful as 3rd or 4th bowler, what Ind needed as I said in the OP is someone who could have tagged along well with zak and got eng 3-4 wkts down And when I said the post you quoted, you had run to cricinfo and i had said that its abt now, i.e. Current situation. let see how Ind does
CSK Fan Posted July 24, 2011 Posted July 24, 2011 After a few games the same folks would be asking for PK's head .... If you see PK vs Sree thread some of them were pitching for Sree. After the tour game, it become PK. Some were even discussing Sree's tummy as if he is their date :hysterical: Unless PK starts bowling like richard had lee, he is not going to be that consistent with his pace. You need to take 5 for 75 or something to make an impact. Many of the were of guys who had already scored 50 and when the 2nd new ball was taken. Positives for PK were that he bowled better than ishant and Bhajji, who are not even worth mentioning. Overall, Ind bowling perfo was disppointing. We needed someone to fire with zak in the first hour or so Another moronic post. five for hundred of means england would be out for two fifty if he had support. You wanted sree instead of pk. I can struck my neck our and say he wouldn't heave taken more than two wickets and give runs at over four. So you turned out to be utterly wrong
Karan114 Posted July 24, 2011 Posted July 24, 2011 Gets Cook cheaply as well, who has been England's most prolific batsman over the last 12 months :two_thumbs_up:
NareshK Posted July 24, 2011 Posted July 24, 2011 Is this thread going to be bumped every time Praveen Kumar takes a wicket ? rett :hehe:
zen Posted July 24, 2011 Author Posted July 24, 2011 Another moronic post. five for hundred of means england would be out for two fifty if he had support. You wanted sree instead of pk. I can struck my neck our and say he wouldn't heave taken more than two wickets and give runs at over four. So you turned out to be utterly wrong Read properly, Understand the context .... We are not doing pure math :winky: Originally Posted by rett After a few games the same folks would be asking for PK's head .... If you see PK vs Sree thread some of them were pitching for Sree. After the tour game, it become PK. Some were even discussing Sree's tummy as if he is their date Unless PK starts bowling like richard had lee, he is not going to be that consistent with his pace. You need to take 5 for 75 or something to make an impact. Many of the were of guys who had already scored 50 and when the 2nd new ball was taken. Positives for PK were that he bowled better than ishant and Bhajji, who are not even worth mentioning. Overall, Ind bowling perfo was disppointing. We needed someone to fire with zak in the first hour or so
zen Posted July 24, 2011 Author Posted July 24, 2011 Is this thread going to be bumped every time Praveen Kumar takes a wicket ? rett :hehe: Then there won't be too many bumps unless you expect PK to pick 4-5 wkts in every test. Chances are I would be inquiring why isn't it being bumped :giggle: PK's blind supporters probably have set themselves for a big fail :hehe:
zen Posted July 24, 2011 Author Posted July 24, 2011 Eng 89/5 .... Imp stage of the game. PK is on ..... Hopefully his buffet bowling would provide a breakthrough and then Ishant can finish it off .... but watching PK bowl in tests is a pain :facepalm:
zen Posted July 24, 2011 Author Posted July 24, 2011 98/5 .... Time to go for the kill .... Come on PK this is the time to deliver or do we have to wait till the 2nd new ball? By that time, the train would have left the station like in the first inning Come on, PK .... 100 up for Eng. Need a breakthrough
punjabi_khota Posted July 24, 2011 Posted July 24, 2011 U still here after being kicked in the kunt in the first innings ?
zen Posted July 24, 2011 Author Posted July 24, 2011 Ishant, a better test bowler, strikes as expected :--D
zen Posted July 24, 2011 Author Posted July 24, 2011 U still here after being kicked in the kunt in the first innings ? Oh seems as if you are feeling the pain in your punjabi- kunt so had to come here :hysterical: Punjabi kunt not a bad name for you :P
zen Posted July 24, 2011 Author Posted July 24, 2011 Still 4 wkts to go, Brilliant swing bowler PK still has a chance for a 5-er
Texan Posted July 24, 2011 Posted July 24, 2011 PK is a very intelligent and under-estimated bowler. In his short career so far, he has showed that he can bowl tight overs and get wickets. I was in favor of picking PK ahead of Sree and Munaf before the Test started also and he has vindicated the faith put in him by the captain.
CSK Fan Posted July 24, 2011 Posted July 24, 2011 98/5 .... Time to go for the kill .... Come on PK this is the time to deliver or do we have to wait till the 2nd new ball? By that time, the train would have left the station like in the first inning Come on, PK .... 100 up for Eng. Need a breakthrough Do you really want me to pull up the number opf times Sreesanth went wicketless in a test? Are you such a moron that you want a five-fer every innings from a bowler who is playing his 4th test? Do you want me to point out the numerous times when it was time to deliver but Sree failed miserably and we did miss the bus? And were you sleeping when PK did pick wickets with the old balls in the first innings?
zen Posted July 24, 2011 Author Posted July 24, 2011 Do you really want me to pull up the number opf times Sreesanth went wicketless in a test? Are you such a moron that you want a five-fer every innings from a bowler who is playing his 4th test? Do you want me to point out the numerous times when it was time to deliver but Sree failed miserably? If you do that it would be truly moronic. And again you missed the point. I can't go on explaining same things again and again .... If the point being made cannot get through to you, it's not my fault It's not about actually providing a breakthrough but not even looking like providing a breakthrough. The post was based on that. Other Thing being implied was that 5- er was more like a flah in the pan .... If you want to run to cricinfo, be my guest :--D But hey all is not lost for PK. Eng would be looking for some quick runs and he may bowl a nagging line, force mistakes and pick up a few wkts, even another 5-er :dontknow: .... This is cricket after all
CSK Fan Posted July 24, 2011 Posted July 24, 2011 So you are such a loser that you are even covering all bases by saying that even if Praveen takes a 5 fer again it will be because of the batsmen? There is one thing being wrong, another being a sore loser As for Praveen not looking like providing a breakthrough, which match are you watching again?I see lots of close LBW appeals, balls taking edges and going through the slips. In fact he has looked like taking a wicket each over
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now