Jump to content

Trent Bridge Test, 2011 : Day by day prediction and discussion


zen

Trent Bridge Test, 2011 : Day by day prediction and discussion  

  1. 1.

    • India
      28
    • England
      12


Recommended Posts

Yeah' date=' as much as I'd love us to get 350, we could easily be shot out for under 200. :(([/quote'] DRAVID LAXMAN TENDULKAR RAINA Yuvraj DHONI BHAJJI I repeat. DRAVID LAXMAN TENDULKAR RAINA Yuvraj DHONI BHAJJI PRAVEEN P.S - I added praveen in the 2nd list to make it look more stronge. Thanks.k
Link to comment

The bowling was good, but did you see the conditions? they were perfect for bowling the ball was swinging and there was uneven bounce all the time (ex. Swann wicket). If you're not going to trouble the batsmen here, then you won't trouble them anywhere at all. I like how Praveen Kumar swings it both ways, today was the first time I actually saw him bowl for a longer spell so I could tell he is perfect for these conditions. Maybe India should have played another fast bowler instead of Harbhajan, England might not have scored 200 then.

Link to comment

Yeah superb comeback so far by the team when some of the English media has virtually written them off. But its crucial in the context of the game to play well today and tomorrow. Both teams are evenly poised at the moment but the pendulum can swing either way in the coming days.

Link to comment
LOL! Did you watch the 15 overs India batted today? Dravid gave a master class on batting in these conditions. Y'all should watch more cricket.
I agree. If anything, Dravid oozed 'defiance' yesterday, and even in the match thread there was a poster whining about him and Laxman getting too 'defensive' :headshake: barely minutes after that Mukund got out. Too many people fail to understand the nuances of Test cricket. That said, I agree with the OP. England and any other country would have been crippled without their openers and main strike bowler. Would England have been the same without their main striker atm Stuart Broad? Yeah, I didn't think so. The haters and English commies have a lot of pondering to do before launching their routine verbal diarrhea about our #1 status. If anything, we've fought like champs, though we could've done so much better in the first Test.
Link to comment
I agree. If anything' date=' Dravid oozed 'defiance' yesterday, and even in the [b']match thread there was a poster whining about him and Laxman getting too 'defensive' :headshake: barely minutes after that Mukund got out. Too many people fail to understand the nuances of Test cricket. That said, I agree with the OP. England and any other country would have been crippled without their openers and main strike bowler. Would England have been the same without their main striker atm Stuart Broad? Yeah, I didn't think so. The haters and English commies have a lot of pondering to do before launching their routine verbal diarrhea about our #1 status. If anything, we've fought like champs, though we could've done so much better in the first Test.
Laxman could have got out 10 times . I just wanted them to play their natural games regardless of the match situation and runs are gonna be crucial in this test match. Even the old ball is swinging like crazy. What if laxman got out for 1 or 2? 30-40 runs sounds better than 1 or 2.
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...