Serani Posted August 19, 2011 Posted August 19, 2011 Any brahs agree with me? He is certainly the most aesthetically pleasing and these days he is looking very solid too since he returned to the side in South Africa a few years ago. Even if he isnt he is certainly my favourite player (no homo)
Trichromatic Posted August 19, 2011 Posted August 19, 2011 What about Jonathan Bradman Trott? Technically he is best batsman in this England side.
Cricket Tragic Posted August 19, 2011 Posted August 19, 2011 I love his batting. My favourite English player to watch since Michael Vaughan.
Pak_Fan_4_Eva Posted August 19, 2011 Posted August 19, 2011 Certainly amongst the best if not THE best. It's always a treat to watch him play provided your team isn't the opposition :D I feel he's pretty under rated. Over-shadowed by the likes of Pietersen, Cook and Strauss. Lad needs to get a couple of huge innings under his belt.
ali0786 Posted August 19, 2011 Posted August 19, 2011 You can't judge him based on what he's done this series because of the quality of bowling. If he performs well in SL then you can say he's up their with the best currently.
Serani Posted August 19, 2011 Author Posted August 19, 2011 I think he will go on an absolute runs spree over the next few years and average in the 50's, I will compare him to Ponting, have a fairly solid but not spectacular start to test cricket and the at the age of 28-32 rack up massive runs.
Trichromatic Posted August 19, 2011 Posted August 19, 2011 ^ He is best player of spin bowling in his side. I guess he would better than others.
jonas10 Posted August 19, 2011 Posted August 19, 2011 No..hes not the best batsman in the world. Sehwag healthy is still way better than him. Lets see him get a double century let alone a triple century before he gets the best in the world title bestowed upon him.
King Posted August 19, 2011 Posted August 19, 2011 He has hit purple patch now but to be consistent is hard. That said he is good on the eyes and has compact technique. One of the batsman I don't mind giving up sleep to watch.
Serani Posted August 19, 2011 Author Posted August 19, 2011 No..hes not the best batsman in the world. Sehwag healthy is still way better than him. Lets see him get a double century let alone a triple century before he gets the best in the world title bestowed upon him. Not sure you got the memo? You know the one saying Sehwag is an FTB? no? Oh well then.
jonas10 Posted August 20, 2011 Posted August 20, 2011 Not sure you got the memo? You know the one saying Sehwag is an FTB? no? Oh well then. Well he certainly isnt an all rounder - even Dhoni is now bowling some overs. He is known first and foremost for his batting. As we all know Sehwag is one guy that cares nothing for stats averages etc. He plays every ball full throttle. Bell is still quite far behind him.
Deleted_User_1 Posted August 20, 2011 Posted August 20, 2011 You English fans are too cocky now......Ian Bell gimme a break, does not even an average of over 50 and already touching 30. Plundering the worst attack in the world (ATM) does not mean batsman equate to SRT or Bradman!
Rahul Dravid Posted August 20, 2011 Posted August 20, 2011 NO. wtf... any good batsman call score runs against this crap bowling of india... doesn't mean hes the BEST. you guys reach conclusions so freaking fast. weirdos.
Serani Posted August 20, 2011 Author Posted August 20, 2011 haters gonna hate Prl2945Rag4 And besides how is my "conclusion" based just on this series? Do you know how I reached my conclusion? Well I doubt it because you havent asked.
jonas10 Posted August 20, 2011 Posted August 20, 2011 Serani...im not saying he isnt a good batsman. I personally think he is a great one just not the best which was your question.
goose Posted August 20, 2011 Posted August 20, 2011 admire him all you want, KP is head and shoulders the most watchable English bat.
Rahul Dravid Posted August 20, 2011 Posted August 20, 2011 admire him all you want' date=' KP is head and shoulders the most watchable English bat.[/quote'] BELL > KP. did you see those cover drives... he is complete class. KP is not consistent... with the bowling we have, we can make ANY batsman seem like they are Class.
goose Posted August 20, 2011 Posted August 20, 2011 BELL > KP. did you see those cover drives... he is complete class. KP is not consistent... with the bowling we have, we can make ANY batsman seem like they are Class. Bell is an asset to England no doubt. I can't get excited about a cricketer unless his performances demand consideration as the world's very best. Dravid struggled under that criteria who the f%ck is Bell.
jf1gp_1 Posted August 20, 2011 Posted August 20, 2011 he is not even the best in english team KP is the better
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now