express bowling Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Go watch the match where vinay kumar' date=' praveen kumar, rp singh and munaf patel were bowling :giggle:[/quote'] They are too quick bro, to meet my august standards. But a man can dream on. :giggle:
TheYuvi02 Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 They are too quick bro' date=' to meet my august standards. But a man can dream on. :giggle:[/quote'] If this keeps on going then soon your dream will come true, imagine 4 vinay kumars bowling in the same match, what a sight that will be :haha:
express bowling Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 If this keeps on going then soon your dream will come true' date=' imagine 4 vinay kumars bowling in the same match, what a sight that will be :haha:[/quote'] The opposition batsmen will get heart attacks from the extreme excitement of the realistic possibility of scoring more than 20 runs per over --- and India will win atlast.
TheYuvi02 Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 The opposition batsmen will get heart attacks from the extreme excitement of the realistic possibility of scoring more than 20 runs per over --- and India will win atlast. Looking at your username you must be extremely excited at the prospect of watching varun aaron make a return to the team tomorrow :giggle:
express bowling Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Looking at your username you must be extremely excited at the prospect of watching varun aaron make a return to the team tomorrow :giggle: Nah, he is too quick and hostile. As guests we should not mistreat our hosts. The Kumars are perfect including Munaf Kumar. We Indians have unleashed on the world of cricket -- pacers without pace and spinners without spin. I am waiting for the day when we produce batsmen or batters without bat. :--D
TheYuvi02 Posted September 15, 2011 Posted September 15, 2011 Nah, he is too quick and hostile. As guests we should not mistreat our hosts. The Kumars are perfect including Munaf Kumar. We Indians have unleashed on the world of cricket -- pacers without pace and spinners without spin. I am waiting for the day when we produce batsmen or batters without bat. :--D :hysterical: we have also produce fielders who can't field
Jersey #10 Posted September 16, 2011 Posted September 16, 2011 phaaast bowlers are not necessarily better... bar Bret Lee bar Shoaib Akhtar
CG Posted September 16, 2011 Posted September 16, 2011 phaaast bowlers are not necessarily better... bar Bret Lee bar Shoaib Akhtar but they are whole lot intresting than kumars and patels
vvvslaxman Posted September 16, 2011 Posted September 16, 2011 but they are whole lot intresting than kumars and patels As long as output is the same what difference it makes.
TheYuvi02 Posted September 16, 2011 Posted September 16, 2011 phaaast bowlers are not necessarily better... bar Bret Lee bar Shoaib Akhtar Look at trundlers vs pacer stats, there have been very few mcgrath and pollock in modern day cricket....
rkt.india Posted September 16, 2011 Posted September 16, 2011 As long as output is the same what difference it makes. but who has the more spark to be effective and successful in future and as history suggests every champion team had genuine pacers in them to contribute and form a variety attack.
TheYuvi02 Posted September 16, 2011 Posted September 16, 2011 but who has the more spark to be effective and successful in future and as history suggests every champion team had genuine pacers in them to contribute and form a variety attack. Look at WI team of 80's and even early 90's the likes of Holding, Marshall, Garner. Look at even Pakistan the reason they used to be a top team is because of fast bowlers like Imran khan, Wasim and Waqar. Australia had Lillee, thomson. And we have the fearsome foursome in Munaf patel, vinay kumar, praveen and rp singh
Cricket Tragic Posted September 16, 2011 Posted September 16, 2011 PK is injured and might not play. Will Aaron get a chance or will it be the more "experienced" Kooooomar?
darkknight Posted September 16, 2011 Posted September 16, 2011 Nah, he is too quick and hostile. As guests we should not mistreat our hosts. The Kumars are perfect including Munaf Kumar. We Indians have unleashed on the world of cricket -- pacers without pace and spinners without spin. I am waiting for the day when we produce batsmen or batters without bat. :--D You nailed it, this is exactly Indian standards in cricket now.
MCcricket Posted September 16, 2011 Posted September 16, 2011 Barring injury to other players I don't think he will play, poor guys waiting all that time for a game , his confidence and faith in his bowling already might be shaken.With England series and India in Austarlia next I am sure any one with common sense and no viable options would opt for him, gameplan shouldve been out Vinay , Aaron to bowl three overs of sharp spells, bouncers yorkers try intimidate.There is no doubt he has pace the fastest Indian bowler I have seen,I have seen him bowl entire day at 140 plus, 145 k no effort , regularly above 147 k in certain spells and upto 153 k.This is serious pace, that is the reason Akram is confounded, now I will not be surprised after everything that has transpired he will play under Dhoni and play safe , knowing his captain wil not support him or does not know the value of impact bowlers,India needs a new captain.
TheYuvi02 Posted September 16, 2011 Posted September 16, 2011 PK is injured and might not play. Will Aaron get a chance or will it be the more "experienced" Kooooomar? vinay kumar deserves it, he has the best slower ball in India right now
asterix Posted September 16, 2011 Posted September 16, 2011 Vinay Kumar should play..Last match of the series and the team management shouldn't take any risk or chances..
TheYuvi02 Posted September 16, 2011 Posted September 16, 2011 Vinay Kumar should play..Last match of the series and the team management shouldn't take any risk or chances.. Is that Dhoni in disguise? :giggle:
express bowling Posted September 16, 2011 Posted September 16, 2011 phaaast bowlers are not necessarily better... bar Bret Lee bar Shoaib Akhtar Apparently they are far better in tests -- Shoaib has a test average of 25.7 , Lee has more than 4 wickets per test ... not bad eh.. -- List of pacers with test bowling averages of 26 or less and more than 200 test wickets would mostly consist of either genuine quicks for atleast the first 6/7 yrs of their career like Waqar, Ambrose, Holding, Roberts, Marshall, Donald, Steyn, Lilee OR tall fast-medium bowlers ( fast-medium for atleast the first 6/7 yrs of their career ) who got extra bounce like McGrath, Pollock, Garner, Gillespie, Akram, I can remember only Richard Hadlee, who was a medium height fast-medium bowler, who had a superb bowling average. But he was a master of swing. How many medium pacers are there who have test bowling averages of 26 or less with more than 200 test wickets ? I would really like the members who are indifferent about the importance of pace / bounce to answer this or I will take it that they are accepting that pace/ bounce are very important. -- Genuine quicks help other bowlers take wickets by softening up batsmen. -- A great pace bowler need not be the fastest in the world. He should have sufficient pace and / or bounce to hurry the batsmen and soften them up with bouncers from time to time.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now