saneindian Posted September 29, 2011 Posted September 29, 2011 Ashish Nehra is baffled and ÅÅeeply hurt after selectors chose to ignore the left-arm seamer for the first two ODIs against England next month. Ū have submitted my fitness certificate before the ODI series in England. I was ignored when they even summoned RP Singh from a holiday. Now they have again ignored me, a visibly upset Nehra told PTI in an exclusive interview. I still donÃÕ know where I exactly went wrong after being IndiaÃÔ highest wicket-taker in ODIs since my comeback in 2009. Also till Pakistan match where I fractured my finger, I didnÃÕ have any major injury issues, the 32-year-old said. űlease check the records, which India bowler has bowled maximum number of overs at the death in last two years. You want me to prove my fitness but then I am not even good enough to be in any of the Challenger Trophy teams. Aapne sabko chance diya hai. Sirf Ashish Nehra hi nahin hain (You have given chance to each and everyone from Kerala to Srinagar)! How come I have become such a bad bowler in a space of few months one couldnÃÕ miss the sarcasm in his voice. But then is his age a factor? He shot back, ŧor GodÃÔ sake, I am 32 and not 42. Virender Sehwag is older than me. And had age been a criteria, then Rahul Dravid couldnÃÕ have made a comeback in ODIs when he is 39. To the question about match-fitness, Nehra explained, Å¢greed I havenÃÕ played much cricket but what about some of those picked in the squad? Did they play any cricket in last three months? And everyone knows for the past two months, I have been sweating it out at the NCAs. Nehra is still not keen on returning back to first-class grind as dayÃÔ cricket takes a lot of toll on a pacerÃÔ body. Å*ook at the likes of Brett Lee, Lasith Malinga who have retured from longer version to take care of their bodies. Now if I donÃÕ have an option, I might have to pick and chose and play Ranji Trophy. Asked about the way ahead, he said he is keen to play in professional leagues abroad if BCCI allows him. Ūf the board allows, I can go and play in Big Bash or Pro-40. Or else, I will play with my little son, he answered with a smile that said it all. PTI http://www.firstpost.com/sports/how-have-i-become-such-a-bad-bowler-in-the-last-few-months-nehra-96133.html#en Is he being discarded too soon? IMO he should have been given a spot in Challenger Trophy.
Stuge Posted September 29, 2011 Posted September 29, 2011 he would have been much better than Vinay Koomar .
VRV Singh Posted September 29, 2011 Posted September 29, 2011 I agree with him. Even if you don't rate him, the musical chairs going on in the bowling unit is laughable.
Pagalpanti Posted September 29, 2011 Posted September 29, 2011 He wasn't bowling great, nor was he in good form either so he had to be dropped given he doesn't fit in future scheme of things. Selectors took a hard decision back in 2009 to drop Dravid, it worked out quite well. So I guess its time we tried new bowlers. Zaheer wont be around long enough either.
WeStMiDz Posted September 29, 2011 Posted September 29, 2011 Given the inexperience of the attack, Nehra in place of Vinny would have been ideal. If we go back the famous Mohali semi, he was bowling really well and at the time it was quite a big blow that he wouldn't be available for the final. He's the only one of the current bunch of useless bowlers that can really get his yorkers in so for that reason alone, he should have been in.
Pagalpanti Posted September 29, 2011 Posted September 29, 2011 How long will you hang with Nehra? And also its not as if he was bowling well. Averaging around 40 and an E/R of 6 isn't good.
The Realist Posted September 29, 2011 Posted September 29, 2011 Seriously need to move on from Nehra. Can't keep basing an attack around bowlers from the 2003 WC.
WeStMiDz Posted September 29, 2011 Posted September 29, 2011 How long will you hang with Nehra? And also its not as if he was bowling well. Averaging around 40 and an E/R of 6 isn't good. Unfortunately we are not blessed with 4 or 5 promising bowlers and quite frankly the thought of PK and VK bowling at the death on flat Indian tracks should make all Indian fans quake in their boots. We need a designated death bowler, it would be very harsh to expect Aaron or Yadav to bowl consistently at the death while VK is totally hopeless and I feel Aravind will go the same way. In contrast as soon as the PP or death overs are on, England automatically turn to Dernbach and Bresnan.
Pagalpanti Posted September 29, 2011 Posted September 29, 2011 ^ we don't have promising bowlers? how can you say that without trying any new bowlers?
Laaloo Posted September 29, 2011 Posted September 29, 2011 ^ we don't have promising bowlers? how can you say that without trying any new bowlers? I agree. Vinay Kumar and Sreenath Aravind are the way to go B->B->
rkt.india Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 I agree. Vinay Kumar and Sreenath Aravind are the way to go B->B-> that is selector's intelligence. They must have had Nehra as an experience bowler instead of Arvind who does not have anything to offer. Though he bowled well only in one game in WC, but still as a death bowler he is very decent.
Spiderguy252 Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 Indian bowling stocks have been hopeless since eternity. Nothing new here.
Sachin=GOD Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 ]Seriously need to move on from Nehra. Can't keep basing an attack around bowlers from the 2003 WC. people have been saying this for the last 6-7 years but he is still around and whenever selected, usually picks up a few wickets and is dropped again. Also, he is far better than the trundlers we currently have and should be in the side.
Trichromatic Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 people have been saying this for the last 6-7 years but he is still around and whenever selected' date=' usually picks up a few wickets and is dropped again. Also, he is far better than the trundlers we currently have and should be in the side.[/quote'] He can certainly be part of ODI team for few years.
Ravi. Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 that is selector's intelligence. They must have had Nehra as an experience bowler instead of Arvind who does not have anything to offer. Though he bowled well only in one game in WC' date=' but still as a death bowler he is very decent.[/quote'] He was a very decent bowler but nowadays he doesnt good enough and looks unfit everytime he plays.
zep1706 Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 I agree that Nehra isn't the future, but neither is VK and if we think just about the present I would take Nehra any day over VK. Anyways I have already said it, won't support India on days when I see VK in the playing XI, it's an insult to have him in the team. Don't hate him, just he isn't good enough to be there.
Dravid_TheWall Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 I think they are looking to the future. However, personally I would choose Nehra as we need his experience due to our bowling woes and this guy still has a few years left in him.
Blue Panther Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 He is nothing but an another trundler. Nothing wrong in trying young guys. He says he is only 32 but he should know he fields and runs in like a 50 year old.
akshayxyz Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 He is nothing but an another trundler. Nothing wrong in trying young guys. He says he is only 32 but he should know he fields and runs in like a 50 year old. kkkkooooooooooooooooooooooommmmmaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now