Trichromatic Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 Apparently this is all over social networking sites. Not sure how much truth lies in these words. Who is Sonia Gandhi: Ther...e is officially no Sonia Gandhi. Her real name in passport is neither Gandhi nor Sonia. Its Edvige Antonia Albina Maino. Sonia is a Russian name and not italian. However, Antonia is an italian name and her passport is italian. Though she has married Rajiv Gandhi* she never accepted change of title officially. ( recall the time of turmoil in indian politics when Sonia Gandhi was trying to be the prime minister, but ultimately ManMohan Singh became her toy) *Rajiv Gandhi: Actually Rajiv Khan being the son of Firoz Khan and Indira Priyadarshani. Gandhi is an assumed title to sentimentally lure indians for their political benefit. They are muslims by religion. Father: Stefano Eugene Maino is socially the father of Sonia. Her father was a German(hitlers army). When Hitlers army went to russia they were captured and imprisoned. He was captured near St. Petersburgh and was imprisoned for 20 years. But he became a member of KGB and his imprisonment was limited to 4 years. When he came back from prison he gave russian name to his daughters. Social father because when she was born her father was in jail for 4 years. Biological father is unconfirmed. Mother: Paula Maino. Family: She had 2 sistersin Orbassano, italy Birthplace Sonia claims she was born in Besano, near Turin in italy. However, as per her birth certificate, She is actually born is Luciana, in the borders of Switzerland. A resort town for German soldiers during war. Education: She initially put forward to Indian Govt. that she studied in Cambridge University which proved to be fake. She submitted an affidavit that she studied english in Bell Education trust at Cambridge. Even this was proven to be fake and was found she never got any education after class five. She was a young girl with no formal education living five years in england. How did she support her livelihood for 5 years? Any wild guesses? Citizenship: She has not given off her italian citizenship. Indira Gandhi used her power to issue her an Indian Citizenship so that she can join Indian politics. She is holding an illegal citizenship in India. No action is being taken by Home Minister. Religion: Cristianity. Bank Balance: Rajiv Gandhi and his family owned 2 billion USD in Swiss Bank as of November,1991. Benefitiary of death of Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi was Sonia Gandhi. Family: Sonia's sister Alexandria(or Anuska) has 2 shops in Italy selling antiques stolen from India. Sonia used her power to smuggle indian artifacts through Air India flights uninspected. Sonia's son Rahul Gandhi, whose real name is Raul Vinci. He got admitted to Harvard in quota but was thrown off soon because he was incompetant. He has italian citizenship since his mother never gave up her citizenship. He cannot officially become the citizen of india or any politician in india as long as he doesnt give up his italian citizenship. Arrested in Boston airport for carrying 160,000 dollars cash, accompanied by Veronique (spanish). veronique is the daughter of Drug mafia leader. Rahul has also been accused for gang raping Sukanya Devi, whose petition to all courts in India have been rejected due to their political hold and the whereabouts of the family is unknown. However, the information is widely available online.
ch1234 Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 *Rajiv Gandhi: Actually Rajiv Khan being the son of Firoz Khan and Indira Priyadarshani. Gandhi is an assumed title to sentimentally lure indians for their political benefit. They are muslims by religion. . Feroze Gandhi was a Parsi; not a Muslim. How come Rajiv be Muslims..
Trichromatic Posted September 30, 2011 Author Posted September 30, 2011 Apparently some of the claims have been made on the basis of what's written on Janatha Party site. Do You Know Your Sonia ? by Dr. Subramanian Swamy (National President, Janatha Party) THREE LIES Ms. Sonia GandhiÃÔ background as publicized by her and her Congress Party is based on three lies in order to hide the ugly reality of her life. First, her real name is Antonia not Sonia. This was revealed by the Italian Ambassador in New Delhi in a letter dated April 27, 1983 [see Annexure-5] to the Union Home Ministry which letter has not been made public. Antonia is SoniaÃÔ real name as stated in her birth certificate. Sonia is the name given to her subsequently by her father, Stefano Maino [now deceased]. He had been a prisoner of war in Russia during World War II. Stefano had joined the Nazi army as a volunteer, as many Italian fascists had done. Sonia is a Russian not Italian name. While spending two years in a Russian jail, SoniaÃÔ father had become quite pro-Soviet, especially after the liberating US army in Italy had confiscated all fascists properties including his. Second, Sonia was not born in Orbassano as she claims in her bio data submitted to Parliament on becoming MP, but in Luciana as stated in her birth certificate. She perhaps would like to hide the place of her birth because of her fatherÃÔ connection with the Nazis and MussoliniÃÔ Fascists, and her familyÃÔ continuing connections with the Nazi-Fascists underground that is still surviving in Italy since the end of the War. Luciana is where Nazi-Fascist network is headquartered, and is on the Italian-Swiss border. There can be no other explanation for this otherwise meaningless lie. Third, Sonia Gandhi has not studied beyond High School. But she has falsely claimed in her sworn affidavit [see Annexure-6] filed as a contesting candidate before the Rae Bareli Returning Officer in the 2004 Lok Sabha elections, that she qualified and got a diploma in English from the prestigious University of Cambridge, UK. Earlier, in 1999 in her biographical data given under her signature to the Lok Sabha Secretariat and which was published in ParliamentÃÔ WhoÃÔ Who, she had made the same false claim [see Annexure-7]. But later she wrote to the Lok Sabha Speaker, after I had pointed it out to him in a written complaint of a Breach of Ethics of the Lok Sabha, that it was a ÅÕyping mistake? This qualifies her for inclusion thus in the the Guinness Book of World Records as the longest typing mistake in history. The truth is that Ms. Gandhi has never studied in any college anywhere. She did go to a Catholic nun--run seminary school called Maria Ausiliatrice in Giaveno [15 kms from her adopted home town of Orbassabo]. Poverty those days had forced young Italian girls to go to such missionaries and then in their teens go to UK to get jobs as cleaning maids, waitresses and au pair. The Mainos were poor those days. SoniaÃÔ father was a mason and mother a share cropper [now the family is worth at least $ 2 billion: (see Annexure-10)]. Sonia thus went to the town of Cambridge UK and first learnt some English in a teaching shop called Lennox School [which has since 1990 been wound up]. That is her ÅÆducation?-- enough English language to get domestic help jobs. But since in Indian society, education is socially highly valued, thus to fool the Indian public, Sonia Gandhi wilfully lied about her qualifications in Parliamentary records [which is a Breach of Ethics Rules] and in a sworn affidavit [which is criminal offence under IPC, severe enough to disqualify her from being MP]. This also violated the spirit of the Supreme Court judgment requiring candidates to reveal their educational qualification on an affidavit [see Annexure-8]. These three lies indicate that Ms. Sonia Gandhi has something to hide, or has a hidden agenda for India to brazenly fool Indians for some ulterior purpose. We therefore need to find out more about her.
akshayxyz Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 Why is this not in 'chit chat' or 'polictics'?
Brainfade Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 I stopped reading at "Rajiv Gandhi ... son of Firoz Khan." Right there, the writer lost all credibility. Even if the rest of it had any inkling of truth, I have no interest in reading something written by someone with no credibility. Writings like this are prime examples of the internet gone awry. Anyone can post anything and 1000s of people will believe it, spread it and make it pathologically viral.
Yoda-esque Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 ^True.Some of his claims are rather outlandish. But just because they are so, should we cease believe them?
Trichromatic Posted September 30, 2011 Author Posted September 30, 2011 Right there, the writer lost all credibility. Even if the rest of it had any inkling of truth, I have no interest in reading something written by someone with no credibility. Writings like this are prime examples of the internet gone awry. Anyone can post anything and 1000s of people will believe it, spread it and make it pathologically viral. Yeah, many people are sharing it as some kind of secret being revealed. I posted it here because I thought members could shed some light on this. One can easily guess that the person who wrote this was filled with hate and rage against that family.
Brainfade Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 ^True.Some of his claims are rather outlandish. But just because they are so, should we cease believe them? Absolutely. When a writer is either (a) too lazy to check the correct name of Rajiv Gandhi's father or (b) is intentionally lying, it immediately puts the rest of the article in the "trash" category. There is no point reading something written by someone with zero credibility.
bulbul Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 I stopped reading at "Rajiv Gandhi ... son of Firoz Khan." Right there, the writer lost all credibility. Even if the rest of it had any inkling of truth, I have no interest in reading something written by someone with no credibility. Writings like this are prime examples of the internet gone awry. Anyone can post anything and 1000s of people will believe it, spread it and make it pathologically viral. i dont know whats wrong in that statement.. just becuase fox wears Tigers skin doesnt mean its tiger...
Trichromatic Posted September 30, 2011 Author Posted September 30, 2011 Absolutely. When a writer is either (a) too lazy to check the correct name of Rajiv Gandhi's father or (b) is intentionally lying' date=' it immediately puts the rest of the article in the "trash" category. There is no point reading something written by someone with zero credibility.[/quote'] That's why I searched for original source of some of the claims made in that post and found that it started with Janatha party. People might have changed their words, added something on their own. What about the claims that Swamy has made?
Khalpat Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 I stopped reading at "Rajiv Gandhi ... son of Firoz Khan." Right there, the writer lost all credibility. Even if the rest of it had any inkling of truth, I have no interest in reading something written by someone with no credibility. Writings like this are prime examples of the internet gone awry. Anyone can post anything and 1000s of people will believe it, spread it and make it pathologically viral. Ok so here is something interesting, since you stopped reading after that: The grandfather of Rajeev Gandhi was Nawab Khan, a muslim businessman who supplied Grocery items at Anand Bhawan. He basically belonged to Junagadh Gujarat. Nawab Khan married a Parsi woman. Firoz was son of this woman. The title of woman was Ghandhi not Gandhi but somehow it has now changed to gandhi. Before marriage Firoz Gandhi was not Gandhi but he was Firoz Khan. ......source "The Nehru Dynasty" writer K. N. Rao
Trichromatic Posted September 30, 2011 Author Posted September 30, 2011 Ok so here is something interesting, since you stopped reading after that: The grandfather of Rajeev Gandhi was Nawab Khan, a muslim businessman who supplied Grocery items at Anand Bhawan. He basically belonged to Junagadh Gujarat. Nawab Khan married a Parsi woman. Firoz was son of this woman. The title of woman was Ghandhi not Gandhi but somehow it has now changed to gandhi. Before marriage Firoz Gandhi was not Gandhi but he was Firoz Khan. ......source "The Nehru Dynasty" writer K. N. Rao [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UoGEIsS2Rk]Nikkah of Inidra Khan(Gandhi)in London - YouTube[/ame]
Brainfade Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 Ok so here is something interesting, since you stopped reading after that: The grandfather of Rajeev Gandhi was Nawab Khan, a muslim businessman who supplied Grocery items at Anand Bhawan. He basically belonged to Junagadh Gujarat. Nawab Khan married a Parsi woman. Firoz was son of this woman. The title of woman was Ghandhi not Gandhi but somehow it has now changed to gandhi. Before marriage Firoz Gandhi was not Gandhi but he was Firoz Khan. ......source "The Nehru Dynasty" writer K. N. Rao *If* this is true, I may have been pwned :-)!!
Khalpat Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 *If* this is true' date=' I may have been pwned :-)!![/quote'] If false then I am as wikipedia says something else about him :winky:
ganeshran Posted October 2, 2011 Posted October 2, 2011 While I'm no supporter of Congress or Sonia/Rahul Gandhi, the amount/character of vitriol against them on social networking sites has reached Goebbelsian proportions. While there is nothing wrong with being a muslim, Feroz Gandhi was not one. He was born in a parsi family to Jehangir Faredoon, not Nawab Khan (there is no proof that Firoz's father was named thus - except a citiation from a book K N Rao which I have not been able to locate).
ravishingravi Posted October 2, 2011 Posted October 2, 2011 ^It certainly is not put to rest. I don't know enough to make a claim either way. But when you have country's leading lady and "lada" having such mystical existence about them without the common man knowing much of their personal lives and past, this kind of speculation is bound to increase.
ganeshran Posted October 2, 2011 Posted October 2, 2011 ^ The onus of proof is on those who are spreading this crackpot theory simply by repeating it over and over again on blogs and social networking sites. I am yet to see an authoritative source which is able to back this up with facts.
CSK Fan Posted October 2, 2011 Posted October 2, 2011 While I'm no supporter of Congress or Sonia/Rahul Gandhi, the amount/character of vitriol against them on social networking sites has reached Goebbelsian proportions. While there is nothing wrong with being a muslim, Feroz Gandhi was not one. He was born in a parsi family to Jehangir Faredoon, not Nawab Khan (there is no proof that Firoz's father was named thus - except a citiation from a book K N Rao which I have not been able to locate). Dunno what personal attacks on people have to do with their politics or their party's idealogy.
Clarke Posted October 4, 2011 Posted October 4, 2011 But since in Indian society, education is socially highly valued, thus to fool the Indian public, Sonia Gandhi wilfully lied about her qualifications in Parliamentary records lol yeah .. the Indian junta checked up on her educational qualifications & thus voted for her :cantstop: I'd say shame on the opposition, you couldn't defeat an Italian born Gandhi who was a nobody in politics much after Rajiv was assassinated, you better come up with something serious to challenge Rahul baba next time.
Recommended Posts