Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

MI ofc got to play 5 overseas players, which at the outset seemed reasonable cause they had all these injuries. Then we find out that one of the "injured" went ahead and played another tournament and acored a ton. So Bambis cheated. :finger: RCB got Gayle as a replacment for Nannes, then got Nannes back AND kept Gayle. They also exceeded the Salary cap in doing so. So. RCB are cheaters too. :finger: In conclusion, no congrats from me to either team. I am just glad the cup stayed back though. :isalute:

Posted

^:cantstop: CSK has been THE best IPL team, it was the first tourney where they failed to reach the semis, and ended their winning streak. They had won IPL-3, CLT20-2, and IPL-4 where other IPL teams did not win anything

Posted
MI ofc got to play 5 overseas players, which at the outset seemed reasonable cause they had all these injuries. Then we find out that one of the "injured" went ahead and played another tournament and acored a ton. So Bambis cheated. :finger: RCB got Gayle as a replacment for Nannes, then got Nannes back AND kept Gayle. They also exceeded the Salary cap in doing so. So. RCB are cheaters too. :finger: In conclusion, no congrats from me to either team. I am just glad the cup stayed back though. :isalute:
Let me ask one simple question! The "Four Overseas players" rule or whatever is applied for every team during IPL which is fine. Now, coming to CL how does these rules apply any more. Why will any team from SA or Aus or wherever have to do with the rules IPL teams have put among themselves. Why can't the IPL teams participating in CL decide upon their own (which in no way violate CL requirements).
Posted

sour grapes. In case of MI they had permission. Also they did not know about that guy being fit. Even that guy was not 100% sure, he played local game and once fit he was back. Did MI play more than 4 overseas player in the final?? Still won right?? And their fifth player was symonds, would have been better if they never had to play 5. Symonds was totally out of form.

Posted
Let me ask one simple question! The "Four Overseas players" rule or whatever is applied for every team during IPL which is fine. Now, coming to CL how does these rules apply any more. Why will any team from SA or Aus or wherever have to do with the rules IPL teams have put among themselves. Why can't the IPL teams participating in CL decide upon their own (which in no way violate CL requirements).
Well that is a good question, but the rules need to same for all IPL teams. The point here is that an exemption was granted to MI cause of all the injuries they had suffered. Did they cheat by intentionally showing as if some of their players were injured when they could have been available for them to play?
sour grapes. In case of MI they had permission. Also they did not know about that guy being fit. Even that guy was not 100% sure, he played local game and once fit he was back. Did MI play more than 4 overseas player in the final?? Still won right?? And their fifth player was symonds, would have been better if they never had to play 5. Symonds was totally out of form.
Regarding MI not actually playing 5 towards end of the tournament, it is irrelevant, cause the cheating had already happened. I am not talking about whether the team was good or not, just talking about cheating. In RCB's case the cheating is worse cause they even exceeded the salary cap. WTF!
Some IPL franchises also allege that RCB had exceeded the total purse of $9 million on player salary. As per the squad details circulated by BCCI on March 11, RCB had spent $8,944,348. Subsequently, Gayle (base price $400,000) replaced Nannes but now with both players featuring in the squad in the Champions League, it effectively means that RCB were spending $9,344,348, more than the cap.
Posted
^:cantstop: CSK has been THE best IPL team, it was the first tourney where they failed to reach the semis, and ended their winning streak. They had won IPL-3, CLT20-2, and IPL-4 where other IPL teams did not win anything
my comment is against u and Yoda.. :winky:
Posted
Some IPL franchises also allege that RCB had exceeded the total purse of $9 million on player salary. As per the squad details circulated by BCCI on March 11, RCB had spent $8,944,348. Subsequently, Gayle (base price $400,000) replaced Nannes but now with both players featuring in the squad in the Champions League, it effectively means that RCB were spending $9,344,348, more than the cap.
But they replaced Charl Langveldt with Nannes.
Posted
But they replaced Charl Langveldt with Nannes.
Is Langveldt still contracted and is he counted towards the cap or not? I am pretty sure he is. Players who are available for two teams have the option of playing for either with home teams getting first choice. If a player decides to go with his home team and not IPL team, I don't believe the IPL teams are eligible for an automatic replacement from what I remember.
Posted

Jesus Christ man, freaking 20/20 Flat Pitches Masala game - u guys are analyzing as if this was some test series. Blame the governing bodies, not sure how much advantage can teams have OK man, Chennai are the best, most honest - take a medal jeez man and Mr. Sensible Sachinism also joined in - shocker

×
×
  • Create New...